130 likes | 244 Vues
Public Pension Funds and Urban Revitalization. December 6 th 2006 Boston, MA Dr. Tessa Hebb, Senior Research Associate Lisa Hagerman, Research Fellow Labor & Worklife Program, Harvard Law School Oxford University Centre for the Environment
E N D
Public Pension Funds and Urban Revitalization December 6th 2006 Boston, MA Dr. Tessa Hebb, Senior Research Associate Lisa Hagerman, Research Fellow Labor & Worklife Program, Harvard Law School Oxford University Centre for the Environment Sponsored by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations
Presentation Overview • Terminology • Best practice findings from pension fund case studies • NYCERS fixed income • CalPERS private equity and real estate • MassPRIM investment selection process
Urban Investment Strategies • Targeted investment in economic development • Types of targeted investment • Private equity • Real estate • Fixed income • Infrastructure • Credit enhancement
Steps in Targeting Investment • Board level champion • Board direction “let’s look at..” • Staff get outside expert study • Boards set broad targets • Select appropriate asset class/amount • Issue targeted investment RFP • Hire top-quartile fund manager
Best Practice in Pension Fund Urban Investment • Success is measured first in risk-adjusted market rates of return • Geographic rather than social targeting • Policy driven by investment philosophy not social targets • RFP deflects political interference • Set broad targets in economic development • Allow top-quartile vehicles to do their job
NYCERS Targeted Policy • Guided by strategic asset allocation policy • 2% across assets - majority to date in fixed income • August 2005 policy asset allocation target: • 6% Fixed Income • 2% Private Equity 2% Real Estate • Geographic target (5 boroughs) and to fill capital gap • Investments programmatic - deflect political interference
CalPERS’ Targeted Investments • Geographic targeting: underserved capital markets • Real estate – CURE Program (1997) ($3.4 b. committed) • Private equity – California Initiative (2000) ($500 m. committed)
Massachusetts PRIM 2003 Targeted Investing Policy • Board champion - State Treasurer • Outside consulting firm completed study • Set 5 criteria for targeted investing • Investment must not exceed a reasonable weighting in portfolio - comply with asset allocation policy • Target capital gap in underserved markets • Social returns will not justify a lower return
Massachusetts PRIM 2006 Targeted Investing RFP • Annual RFP reduces dedicated staff time • Transparent fund manager selection process • Advertised in marketplace • Fund manager demonstrate will invest over 50% of portfolio in Massachusetts
Massachusetts PRIM Manager Selection Process • Search committee evaluates & recommends • Real estate consultant may review • Will investments meet 5 targeted criteria? • Analyze ability to meet benchmarks • Fees • Investment cmte votes (outside experts) • PRIM Board votes with comfort of due diligence
Massachusetts PRIM Current Targeted Investments • $160 million committed • $114 million deployedto date • Real Estate New Boston-USA, Canyon Johnson, Intercontinental • Private Equity Flagship Ventures, Castile Ventures • Fixed Income Access Capital, CRA Fund Advisors • CRA Fund Advisors approved through 2006 RFP
Project website • For more information and case studies: http://urban.ouce.ox.ac.uk