1 / 11

End to End Quality of Service

End to End Quality of Service. Paul Coverdale Nortel Networks Tel: +1 613 763 4277 Email: paulcov@nortelnetworks.com. End to end QoS. everybody talks about it what does it mean ? how do we get it ?. QoS-enabled Domain 1. QoS-enabled Domain 2. QoS-enabled Domain n.

raleigh
Télécharger la présentation

End to End Quality of Service

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. End to End Quality of Service Paul Coverdale Nortel Networks Tel: +1 613 763 4277 Email: paulcov@nortelnetworks.com

  2. End to end QoS • everybody talks about it • what does it mean ? • how do we get it ? GSC-8, OTTAWA

  3. QoS-enabled Domain 1 QoS-enabled Domain 2 QoS-enabled Domain n Bottom-up approach to end to end QoS • lots of attention on mechanisms and protocols for enabling QoS in individual IP domains • these mechanisms drive resulting end to end QoS • not clear on benefit to end-user End to end QoS required by user (QoE) GSC-8, OTTAWA

  4. QoS-enabled Domain 1 QoS-enabled Domain 2 QoS-enabled Domain n Top-down approach to end to end QoS • focus on customer (the one who pays the bill) • understand end-user expectations for QoS • Quality of Experience (QoE) • use these to drive requirements for specific QoS mechanisms for individual domains End to end QoS required by user (QoE) GSC-8, OTTAWA

  5. Packet Loss Interactive Responsive Timely Non-critical 5% Conversational voice and video Voice/video messaging Streaming audio/video Delay 100 msec 1 sec 10 sec Fax 100 sec 0% Command/ control (eg Telnet, Interactive games) Transactions (eg E-commerce, Web-browsing, E-mail access) Messaging, Downloads (eg FTP, still image) Background (eg Usenet) Zero loss End-user requirements • wide range of user requirements, depending on application From ITU-T Rec. G.1010 GSC-8, OTTAWA

  6. QoS Classes Network Class 0 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Performance Un- Parameter specified Transfer delay 100ms 400ms 100ms 400ms 1 s U Delay variation 50ms 50ms U U U U -3 -3 -3 -3 -3 Packet loss ratio 1*10 1*10 1*10 1*10 1*10 U -4 Packet error ratio 1*10 U Network QoS Classes • no need to try to meet specific QoS requirements for each application • provide several network QoS classes to carry traffic having broadly similar requirements From ITU-T Rec. Y.1541 GSC-8, OTTAWA

  7. Implementing end to end QoS • two fundamentally different approaches • Internet model • Managed-Network model GSC-8, OTTAWA

  8. QoS Signalling Call Signalling Internet model • intelligence remains at network edge • provides autonomy for end-points • but who is responsible for end to end QoS ? Application Plane Transport Plane Transport Domain 1 Transport Domain 3 Transport Domain 2 Bearer Traffic GSC-8, OTTAWA

  9. QoS Signalling Call Signalling Managed-Network model • service provider able to control end to end QoS • but end-point tied to specific service provider Service Domain 2 Service Domain 1 Application Plane Transport Plane Transport Domain 1 Transport Domain 3 Transport Domain 2 Bearer Traffic GSC-8, OTTAWA

  10. Standards Bodies addressing QoS • many Standards Bodies involved in QoS • IETF, ITU, ETSI, 3GPP, 3GPP2, IEEE, T1, MEF, etc • main focus on QoS mechanisms or on specific network elements (eg wireless or cable access) • achieving complete end to end QoS is clearly a Standards issue • need for better co-operation and co-ordination between Bodies to address end to end picture GSC-8, OTTAWA

  11. Conclusions • need for recognition and reconciliation of different viewpoints on QoS • need for focus on the end-user • need for better coordination between Standards Bodies • ITU-T is well-positioned to take the leadership role • ITU-T Workshop on End to End QoS planned for Oct 1-3 2003 • Recommend GSC-8 should endorse a Resolution proposing ITU-T as prime Body for establishing global standards for end to end QoS GSC-8, OTTAWA

More Related