1 / 14

Decentralization: A World-Wide Phenomenon

Decentralization of Functions International Conference on Governance and Accountability in Social Sector Decentralization Dana Weist dweist@worldbank.org PRMPS 18 February 2004. Decentralization: A World-Wide Phenomenon. Underway in over 85 countries Political and economic rationales

rance
Télécharger la présentation

Decentralization: A World-Wide Phenomenon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Decentralization of Functions International Conference on Governance and Accountability in Social Sector Decentralization Dana Weistdweist@worldbank.orgPRMPS 18 February 2004

  2. Decentralization: A World-Wide Phenomenon • Underway in over 85 countries • Political and economic rationales • Varieties • Deconcentration • Delegation • Devolution • Great variation across countries, and across sectors within a country • Often complicated and evolving over time

  3. Key Service Delivery Questions • Who is doing what? • How is it being financed? Answers to these questions often determine the equity, efficiency, and accountabilities of service delivery

  4. Who is Responsible for What? • Public versus private sectors? • Which tier of the public sector? • Central or local government production • Contracting with other governments, private sector, community groups • Who • determines policy? • produces and provides services? • finances? • regulates, enforces, monitors, and evaluates?

  5. How is it Being Financed? • Budget allocations • Government transfers/grants • Local taxes/charges/fees • Community charges/fees

  6. Dilemma: Clinics Lack Medicine or Schools Lack Textbooks • What does the intergovernmental system have to do with it? • Discrepancy between responsibility and financing: local government responsible for providing services without resources • Insufficient funds: weak central or local revenue mobilization • Cash flow: Central Government slow to release needed funds • Weak budgeting: inability to forecast realistic costs • Leakage: corruption/malfeasance

  7. Positive or Negative Outcomes? • If designed well, decentralization can: • Move decision making closer to people • Enhance efficiency and responsiveness of service delivery • Potential tool to alleviate poverty • But, design is complicated, since it spans fiscal, political, and administrative policies and institutions • Design + Accountability + Capacity

  8. Enhancing Decentralization Design • Systematic approach that aligns • Responsibility with financing • Decentralization framework with sectoral approaches • Responsibility/decentralization of functions: organization, planning, personnel, infrastructure, resources, regulation • Intergovernmental finance: expenditures, revenues, intergovernmental transfers • Consistent legal framework

  9. Changing Central Roles and Functions • Change role from “command and control” to policy guidance and facilitation • Establish government’s policy framework • Structure proper incentives for local governments • Stop delivering most public services • Central government plays a central role • Legal and regulatory frameworks • Setting standards • Coordination mechanisms • Accurate, timely and comprehensive information • Capacity building programs

  10. Expenditure Responsibility • Considerations for assigning responsibility: public goods, externalities, subsidiarity, economies of scale, public sector competition • Ultimately, no single best assignment • Ideally, services should be provided at lowest level of government where benefits lie • Public provision does not imply public production • Clarity is critically important

  11. Local Revenue Mobilization • Mix of local revenues needed • Striking variations in size and capacity • One size doesn’t fit all • Local revenue mobilization strengthens accountability • Local revenues often inadequate to carry out assigned functions

  12. Intergovernmental Transfers • Rationales • Vertical imbalances • Horizontal imbalances (equalization) • Externalities (inter-jurisdictional spillovers) • Enhancing national objectives at the subnational level • Paying for national programs implemented by subnational governments • Transfers should be transparent and predictable (formula-based)

  13. Strengthening Accountability • Do local services respond to local needs? • Citizens have meaningful opportunities for voice (e.g., elected councils, locally appointed officers, participatory budgeting and planning, local civic forums, surveys and report cards) • Citizens can assess performance of their leaders • Officials face incentives to respond • Civic and private partners are involved in service delivery • Fiscal responsibilities • Local tax collections • Discretion in budget allocations • Accountability to central government • Reporting on outcomes • Financial disclosure and reporting

  14. Building Capacity • Build capacity concurrently with devolving responsibility • “Learn by doing” • Establish professional networks and other modes for peer learning and sharing experience • Central government capacity must be strengthened too

More Related