1 / 25

EU Jobs Bank

EU Jobs Bank. 3 rd Survey of Information from Teachers. Qu 1 Subjects Taught. Qu 2 How long have you been working as a teacher?. Germany has the greatest range of experience highest (40 years) to lowest (1 year ) Average was 16.5 years. Qu 3 Teacher’s Age.

rangle
Télécharger la présentation

EU Jobs Bank

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EU Jobs Bank 3rd Survey of Information from Teachers

  2. Qu 1 Subjects Taught

  3. Qu 2 How long have you been working as a teacher? • Germany has the greatest range of experience • highest (40 years) to lowest (1 year) • Average was 16.5 years

  4. Qu 3 Teacher’s Age Most teachers in 40-50 age group

  5. Qu 4 Link between university subject and subject taught • Romania had the most teachers with the same subject (83%) • Czech Republic had the most teachers with no link to their university subject (16%)

  6. Qu 5 In-service skills training Qu 6 Rating of importance of in-service training • Highest average number of training courses undertaken – Spain (17) • Lithuania highest number of ‘most important’ (92%) • Bolu lowest number of ‘most important’ (32%)

  7. Qu7 Ability to keep up to date with relevant technology • No-one said they were unable to do this • Romania had most people saying ‘yes’ (78%)

  8. Qu 8 Relevance of subject to needs of jobs market • Score 5 • Czech Rep most positive responses at 88% • Burdur lowest at 4% • Score 1 • Lithuania only one to record any ‘not relevant’ score (4%)

  9. Qu 9 How well do your students engage with technology? • Score 5 • Italy – 100% students • Score 1 • No-one recorded any ‘1 Not at all’ scores (unsurprisingly) • Burdur had highest amount of lower scores (2 and 3)

  10. Qu10 Ratio between theory and practice • Bolumost practical72% • Romanialeast practical25% • Most common is 50/50 split

  11. Qu11 Practical Training

  12. Qu 12 Length of Practical Training Responses varied widely, even from teacher to teacher and could possibly be linked to subject (?) Bolu16 weeks per year Czech Rep22 weeks per year Burdur3 days per week/8 weeks of the yearI Italy76% teachers reported 1 week per year The rest offered a wide variety of responsesbut there wasn’t a standardised response so difficult to analyse

  13. Qu 13Preparation of Students for Work • Score 5 • Italy Highest % (76%) • Spain lowest (4%) but very high Score 4 (52%) • Score 1 • Burdurhad highest % (16%) of Score 1

  14. Qu 14 Importance of IT • Score 5 • Highest Italy (52%) Lowest Bolu, Germany, Spain lowest with 4% • Score 1 • All fairly low, although Bolu had a high Score 2 at 44%

  15. Qu 15 Vocational education in other countries • Highest Yes Lithuania (100%) • Lowest Yes Burdur (24%)

  16. Qu 15 sources of information

  17. Qu 16 Foreign Languages Spoken by Teachers • Italy - no other languages • Czech Republic highest % of languages overall

  18. Qu 17 contact with employers • Yes • Highest Lithuania 92% • Lowest Italy 4%

  19. Qu17 Nature of contact

  20. Qu 18How do you stay informed about world of work?

  21. Qu 19 Teaching practical skills in foreign language and motivation of students? • Yes • HighestItaly 96% • Lowest Burdur 24%

  22. Qu 19 How it helps them

  23. Qu 20 Students skills and business start-up • Yes • Highest Lithuania 56% • LowestBurdur 8%

  24. Qu 21 Important soft skills Highest Rated Willingness to learn73% Communication68% Willingness to take instruction68% Lowest Rated Writing skills33%

  25. Qu 22 Suggested improvements to effectiveness of training

More Related