1 / 13

Analysis of Peak Values Using Double and Triple Gaussian Fits in Planck Spectrum

This study explores the analysis of peak values derived from double and triple Gaussian fits in conjunction with the Planck spectrum. We investigate the peak performance of the Planck spectrum fitting and assess the accuracy of the model through comparisons with previous Gaussian fits. The results show significant alignments with expected values, including a minimum fit area of 33.3E-15 m², which corresponds to 106% of the anticipated area. The study also evaluates the fit's precision, offering insights into the corresponding minima at 1.25 nm and 1.27 nm against the expected 1.05 nm.

raphael-park
Télécharger la présentation

Analysis of Peak Values Using Double and Triple Gaussian Fits in Planck Spectrum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. C8-200nm-509 052109

  2.  from double-Gaussian peak Peak value from double Gaussian

  3.  from triple-Gaussian peak Peak value from triple Gaussian

  4. Planck Spectrum Fit for  f(x) = b*(((x-d)*a)^(3*c))/(exp((x-d)*a)-1) Peak value from Planck Spectrum

  5. Planck Spectrum Fit for  f(x) = b*(((x-d)*a)^(3*c))/(exp((x-d)*a)-1) Peak value from Planck Spectrum

  6. Previous Gaussian fit for 

  7. Fixed  and 

  8. Zoom d and area plots 8th order polynomial fit! Fit mininum = 33.3E-15 m2 = 106% of expected (31.4E-15 m2) Fit mininum = 1.27nm Expected approx. 1.05 nm

  9. Fit mininum = 34.9E-15 m2 = 111% of expected (31.4E-15 m2) Fit mininum = 1.25nm Expected approx. 1.05 nm

More Related