1 / 19

Y. Sumino (Tohoku Univ.)

Boost-invariant Leptonic Observables and Reconstruction of Parent Particle Mass. Y. Sumino (Tohoku Univ.). Collab. S.Kawabata, Y.Shimizu, H.Yokoya. ☆ Plan of Talk. Motivations Construction of Boost-inv. Leptonic Observables Higgs Mass Reconstr . in VBF Mode (demonstration)

rasia
Télécharger la présentation

Y. Sumino (Tohoku Univ.)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Boost-invariant Leptonic Observables and Reconstruction of Parent Particle Mass Y. Sumino(Tohoku Univ.) Collab. S.Kawabata, Y.Shimizu, H.Yokoya

  2. ☆ Plan of Talk • Motivations • Construction of Boost-inv. Leptonic Observables • Higgs Mass Reconstr. in VBF Mode (demonstration) • Summary and Future Applications

  3. Challenges for precise measurements of properties of (new) particles in LHC experiments: • In reconstructing kinematics of events, difficult to reconstruct jet energy scales accurately. • cf. electron and muon energy-momenta • Often interesting events include missing momenta. • Parton-level c.m. frame unknown from initial-state. • Limited accuracy of PDF. e.g. Reconstruction of energy-momenta of (new) particles is non-trivial.

  4. We propose a class of observables for measurements of properties of a particle (scalar or unpolarized), which decays as Virtues of the new observables • At Leading Order (no cuts, no bkg.): • Use only lepton energy distribution. (indep. of jet obs., missing mom.) • Independent of parent particle velocity, i.e. free from PDF, ISR, etc. • Including cuts and bkg: • A large d.o.f. of the observables allows to reduce/control effects of cuts and backgrounds. • Effects of cuts and bkgcan be kept small and under control.

  5. Lepton energy distributionin lab. frame Construction of the observables 2-body decay: : velocity of in lab. frame : energy of in rest frame : energy of in lab. frame ( : rapidity) Heuristic argument: contributions cancel By appropriately choosing , , …, one can eliminate dependence to arbitrary order.

  6. ….. Answer Maximal set of observables indep. of of . (1) (2) If , Usage:For example, if , we adjust the value of , such that to determine the true value of .

  7. Many-body decay: Observable energy in lab. frame energy distr. in rest frame • Dependent on and the parameters of . • Same as in the two-body decay case.

  8. mH reconstruction using Higgs bosons in VBF and decay q W H W q W Strategy of our analysis follows, to a large extent, that of Asai et al., EPJ C32S2, 19 (2004). S/N of order 2-4 is expected for . H W

  9. q • Two Criteria need to be satisfied to ensure use of the observable . • The lepton energy distribution in the Higgs rest frame agrees with the • theoretical prediction . • (2) The lepton angular distribution in the Higgs rest frame is isotropic. W H W q Effects of cuts should not violate these criteria significantly. • Cuts involving only jets would not affect the above criteria but only affect the b distribution of the Higgs boson. • Cuts involving leptons can affect the above criteria significantly. Slight modification of the leptonic cuts from Asai et al. In particular, lepton angular cuts are replaced by a Lorentz inv. cut GeV. By including this cut in the theoretical prediction , it does not affect the above criteria (1)(2).

  10. Data Analysis based on MC simulations (MadEvent+PYTHIA+PGS) mH=150GeV, mmmode

  11. Check two criteria MC signal events after all cuts Theory prediction GeV, GeV cosqdistribution Lepton energy distr. in the Higgs rest frame l Second criterion is satisfied only by events with small boost factors. We can adjust to suppress contributions from events with large . First criterion OK. q Boost vec. H rest frame

  12. G(ey)=1/cosh(ny) with n=4 mH reconstruction using Systematic effect DmH Only signal events Signal Effect of cuts +2.6 GeV (+1.7%) Bkg tt+tW -2 GeV (-1%) WWjj(EW) 0 GeV (0%) Statistical error: using Nl leptons. Signal+bkg events Signal tt+tW WWjj

  13. Summary and Future Applications • We proposed a class of observables: • constructed from lepton energy distribution, • independent of parent particle’s velocity, • a large deg. of freedom. • mH reconstruction using VBF and decay • Stat. error likely to dominate over sys. errors. • Possible applications • Slepton decay • Top mass measurement • Measurements of various couplings ~

  14. ２体崩壊（　　　　　　）の場合 ローレンツ不変性 このオブザーバブルはなぜローレンツ不変か？ テンソル解析により、各項はローレンツ不変でないことが分かる →　無限項の足し合わせで　　依存性が消える これは従来のローレンツ群の表現論の枠組におさまらない 新しいオブザーバブルのローレンツ不変性が明白な形で表せるような テンソル解析の拡大が望まれる →　より一般的な物理過程に適用できる可能性

  15. Many-body decay: boost Observable • Dependent on and the parameters of . • Same G(x) as in the two-body decay case.

  16. Modification of cuts

  17. Check two criteria q W H W q Theory prediction GeV, GeV l q Boost vec. Jet1 Lab H rest frame Jet2 Effects of PT-cut, h-cut, and isolated lepton requirement cosqdistribution

More Related