1 / 9

ADVANCE 802.20 DRAFT TO SPONSOR BALLOT

ADVANCE 802.20 DRAFT TO SPONSOR BALLOT. Arnie Greenspan Chair, 802.20 Atlanta, GA November 16, 2007. COMMENT DATA BASE.

ray
Télécharger la présentation

ADVANCE 802.20 DRAFT TO SPONSOR BALLOT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ADVANCE 802.20 DRAFT TO SPONSOR BALLOT Arnie Greenspan Chair, 802.20 Atlanta, GA November 16, 2007 Arnie Greenspan, AROSCO, Chair 802.20

  2. COMMENT DATA BASE • The comments and comment resolution package are provided for your attention and review, they can be found at http://ieee802.org/20/802_LMSC.html (no password is required to access the associated files). Arnie Greenspan, AROSCO, Chair 802.20

  3. Sponsor Ballot Approval for 802.20 • No vote statistics— 2 No Voters & 6 negative comments • Nokia Siemens has 1 unsatisfied negative comment that submitted in the initial ballot, only comment submitted. The WG did not accept the comment as it was contrary to a previous vote and decision.(Comment #3) • Broadcom has 5 unsatisfied negative comments. (Comment #s 5, 153 , 154, 158, 159)The thread of these negative comments date back to a time of the practice ballots. The WG has spent considerable time trying to satisfying these comments. The WG did successfully satisfy 70 negative comments by the voter. • Since there are no new unsatisfied negative comments, the WG will not recirculate the material. The WG feels that adequate due diligence has been performed in regards to this negative balloters‘ comments. Arnie Greenspan, AROSCO, Chair 802.20

  4. Sponsor Ballot Approval for 802.20 • The draft 802.20 has completed 1 recirculation. • The recirculation closed on November 6, 2007 with the following results: • 13/2/6 for an affirmation ratio of 86.67%, a response ratio of 77.78%, and an abstention ratio of 28.57% • There were two No votes. • Two No votes from LB1m changed to Yes in recirculation. • The group completed the recirculation comment resolution. and successfully resolved 2050 comments in the initial ballot and recirculation. (Plus approximately 750 comments in the practice ballot). Over 99% of the comments have been resolved • Motion to seek approval to forward 802.20/D3.0m to Sponsor Ballot passed at the WG with a vote of 9/2/1 Arnie Greenspan, AROSCO, Chair 802.20

  5. YES Voters Poll at Plenary ============================= Airvana - not present Alcatel-Lucent - no change AROSCO - no change Ericsson - no change Institute of Miyagi Prefecture - no change Kyocera - no change Motorola - no change NEC Infrontia - no change Niigata University - no change Qualcomm - no change Steepest Ascent Ltd - not present Strathclyde University - not present Abstain Voters Poll at Plenary ============================= AT&T - not present ETRI - not present Intel - not present LG electronics - not present Mitsubishi - not present Samsung - not present Arnie Greenspan, AROSCO, Chair 802.20

  6. No Voters Poll at Plenary ============================= Broadcom - have you changed from no to yes? no change - if not, please state the unsatisfied no comments : Comment #5, 153, 154, 158, 159 Nokia Siemens - have you changed from no to yes? no change - if not, please state the unsatisfied no comments : Comment #3 Motion, "The WG affirms the resolution of comments that occurred during the November 2007 session for Letter Ballot 2m." Moved by Jerry Upton Seconded by Nancy Bravin Vote: No negatives, No Abstains, approved by affirmation Arnie Greenspan, AROSCO, Chair 802.20

  7. Motion, "The working group recommends that 802.20 D3.0m be forwarded to the EC to proceed to sponsor ballot.“ Moved by: R. Canchi ; seconded by : N. Bravin Roll Call Vote Results 9-2-1 ============ Advanced Network Technical Solutions - not present Airvana - not present Alcatel-Lucent - yes AROSCO - yes AT&T/Cingular - abstain Broadcom - no Ericsson -yes ETRI - not here Fujitsu - not here Institute of Miyagi Prefecture - yes Intel - not here Kyocera - yes LG Electronics - not present Marvel - not present Mitsubishi - not present Motorola - yes NEC Infrontia - yes Niigata University - yes Nokia Siemens Netoworks - no Nortel - not present POSDATA - not present Qualcomm yes Samsung - not present Steepest Ascent Ltd - not present Strathclyde University - not present Texas Instruments - not present Vodafone - not present Arnie Greenspan, AROSCO, Chair 802.20

  8. Sponsor Ballot Approval for 802.20 Move to forward the 802.20/D3.0m draft to the SASB with the recommendation that Sponsor Ballot be initiated Mover: Arnie Greenspan Second: Tony Jeffree Arnie Greenspan, AROSCO, Chair 802.20

  9. Nokia Siemens Networks Comment Resolution The technologies for Wideband FDD of 802.20 and 3GPP2 C.S0084 were developed in parallel. In addition a Wideband TDD was also submitted and included in the 802.20 draft. The 3GPP2 C.S0084 does not include Wideband TDD. The FDD material originally submitted to 802 in November 2005 was also submitted to 3GPP2 TSG-C during 2006, since the participating companies were developing a similar technology. At the time of the resumption of 802.20 meetings, the technologies in 3GPP2 had evolved. When 802.20 resumed, Motorola made a proposal to harmonize technical aspects of the then current Wideband FDD 802.20 technology with the evolved features introduced in TSG-C. This was accepted by the WG, and the draft material was revised in accordance with the proposal, retaining all the original functionality of the 802.20 draft including Wideband and Narrowband TDD. Subsequently changes and corrections were made to draft as part of the practice ballots and letter ballots. .Given that the original Wideband FDD text came from largely the same companies, there is similarity between these two; however functionality in 802.20 is greater than that in C.S0084, with the continuance of TDD modes, support for 802-based architectures, and management structures supported by 802-based vendors. The 3GPP2 air interface is coupled to a specific 3GPP2 network architecture. The 802.20 air interface is not coupled to a specific network architecture and supports any Internet like architecture or others. Therefore although there is strong similarity today between the two specifications, the Working Group has agreed that this is an independent project and will evolve on its own, and therefore cannot be coupled to specifications controlled by another organization.   Arnie Greenspan, AROSCO, Chair 802.20

More Related