1 / 32

Kramers Problem in anomalous dynamics

Kramers Problem in anomalous dynamics. Sliusarenko O.Yu. Akhiezer Institute for Theoretical Physics NSC KIPT, Kharkiv, Ukraine. Classical Kramers Problem.

raymondsantos
Télécharger la présentation

Kramers Problem in anomalous dynamics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kramers Problem in anomalous dynamics Sliusarenko O.Yu. Akhiezer Institute for Theoretical PhysicsNSC KIPT, Kharkiv, Ukraine

  2. Classical Kramers Problem • Calculating the mean escape rate of a particle from a potential well due to the influence of an external random force with Gaussian probability distribution law • Pontryagin L.S., Andronov A.A., Witt A.A. JETP 3, 165 (1933). • H. A. Kramers, Physica Amsterdam 7, 284 (1940). • Modeling of some chemical reactions • The electroconductivity theory of crystals • Nucleation theories • Climatic dynamics etc.

  3. Classical Kramers Problemcontinued. Assumptions: • One-dimensional motion, for simplicity; • All the particles are concentrated in one point at the initial moment of time; • The particles do not interact; • The potential’s height is much larger, than the heat motion energy; • All this leads to the problem with quasi-stationary conditions Н

  4. Classical Kramers Problemcontinued.. • Chandrasekhar Stochasic Processes in Physics and Astronomy • An integral representation of Fokker-Planck equation • where the integral is taken through an arbitrary path, from the point A to the point B, is the current’s density, βis some constatnt. • Considering a one-dimensional problem,

  5. Classical Kramers Problemcontinued... • In the point A we have a Maxwell-Bolzmann disrtibution. Then, the number of particles near the point A will be • Expanding the potential • We can calculate the integral approximately

  6. PART Ia-stable Levy Motion

  7. Levy Probability Distribution Law

  8. Kramers Problem for Levy Statistics Why the straight analytical approach is not possible? • The Fokker-Planck equation now has fractional derivatives • => a complicated integro-differential equation in partial derivatives • The Levy PDF does not have an analytical representation in real space; • The infinite variance of the noise. One of the ideas: • Langevin numerical simulations.

  9. Numerical Simulations • Langevin equations • Let us examine the strong friction case, when : • Or, in dimensionless variables after the time quantization: • x isthe particle’s coordinate, vis its velocity, mis its mass, γ is a friction constant, U(x) is an external potential, ξα(t)is a random force, Dis its intensity, α is the Levy index.

  10. Motion in the Potential • Let us study the double-well potential • The time-discrete Langevin equation:

  11. The First Passage Time • We place the particle to the left potential’s minimum (x0= -1); • The iterations of the time-discrete Langevin equation begin; • When the particle reaches the point x=0, we regard it as the escaped one • We stop the timer; • The algorithm is re-executed for 100000 times to gain the statistics, then the time is averaged.

  12. The First Passage Timecontinued.

  13. The First Passage Timecontinued..

  14. The Mean First Passage Time (other potentials)

  15. Simulating the FP time PDF • We place the particle to the left potential’s minimum(x0= -1); • The iterations of the time-discrete Langevin equation begin; • When the particle reaches the point x=0, we regard it as the escaped one • We stop the timer; • The algorithm is re-executed for 1000000 times to gain the statistics, then the times are treated with a procedure that extracts the PDF of the data.

  16. The FP time PDF

  17. The FP time PDFs(other potentials) Cubic potential Harmonic potential

  18. Analytical Approach. The Constant Flux Approximation • FFPE in dimensionless variables • In terms of probability flux • After the Fourier transformation of both equations

  19. Analytical Approach. The Constant Flux Approximationcontinued. • Consider a constant probability flux • Solving for f(k), executing an inverse Fourier transformation

  20. Analytical Approach of Imkeller and Pavlyukevich • P.Imkeller, I. Pavlyukevich J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 (2006) L237–L246 Levy noise Gaussian-like noise Large “outliers” The escapes are done during a single jump Between the large jumps makes the particles relax to the potential’s bottom If one jump is not enough

  21. Analytical Approach of Imkeller and Pavlyukevich continued.

  22. application A Problem from Climatic Dynamics Peter D. Ditlevsen, Geophysical Research Letters, 26, 1441 (1999) The fluctuations of Calcium concentration inside the ice core was studied 1. The times between the two states of the system are nicely described with the Poisson process; 2. The PDF is bimodal => the double-well “potential” is possible; 3. The noise is white but with strongly non-Gaussian PDF

  23. A Problem from Climatic Dynamicscontinued. Levy noise, α=1,75 1000-2000year fluctuations Gaussian noise, year fluctuations

  24. Publications: 1. A.V. Chechkin, O.Yu. Sliusarenko On Lévy flights in potential well.Ukr. J. Phys., 2007, v.52, №3, p. 295–300 2. Aleksei V. Chechkin, O.Yu. Sliusarenko, Ralf Metzler, and Joseph KlafterBarrier crossing driven by Lévy noise: Universality and the role of noise intensity.Physical Review E, 2007, v. 75, 041101, p. 041101‑1–041101‑11 3.A.V. Chechkin, O.Yu. SliusarenkoGeneralized Kramers’ problem for Lévy particle.Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2007, №3(2), p. 293–296 Conferences: 1. 373th Wilhelm und Else Heraeus-Seminar, Anomalous Transport: Experimental Results and Theoretical Challenges, Bad Honnef, Germany, July 12-16, 2006 2. 2-nd International conference on Quantum electrodynamics and statistical physics (QEDSP2006), Kharkiv, Ukraine, September 19-23, 2006 3. Physics of Fluctuations far from Equilibrium, Dresden, Germany, July 02-06, 2007

  25. PART IIFractional Brownian Motion.

  26. Fractional Gaussian Noise noise H=0.3 H=0.7 free motion H=0.3 H=0.7

  27. Simulation Procedure

  28. Mean Escape Time The escape time of the particle from the truncated harmonic potential well as the function of an inverse noise intensity 1/D. The same, but in a logarithmic scale. Now, the exponential behaviour is clearly noticeable.

  29. MET vs Hurst Exponent Dependence of mean escape time on Hurst exponent (anti-persistent case), four noise intensity values, a logarithmic plot. Dependence of mean escape time on Hurst exponent (anti-persistent case), a logarithmic plot. Solid line is a linear fitting dashed line is a parabolic fitting. It is clear, that the linear fitting of the data is not correct.

  30. Exponential Behavior of MET

  31. PDF of ETs Probability density function of mean escape times as the function of walking time, logarithmic plot. The exponential behaviour is observed.

  32. Thank you for your interest and attention!

More Related