150 likes | 255 Vues
This report presents findings from a comprehensive survey analyzing business opinions on para-fiscal charges, conducted among NALED members, clients of UVRA, and 250 businesses. A significant 58% of respondents believe they encounter these charges in their daily operations, attributing responsibility largely to the state (67%). The financial impact analysis encompasses 12 diverse business entities, revealing trends in national and local fees across large, medium, and small enterprises. The study highlights the lack of transparency and predictability in the system of non-tax charges.
E N D
Round table– Para-fiscal charges Financial impact analysis of para-fiscal charges to doing business and business opinions on non-tax charges Belgrade, 12th March 2014
Survey results “Business opinion–para-fiscal charges” TASK: Learn about the business opinions on para-fiscal charges and the conducted reform of charges. Surveys conducted among: NALED members; Clients of UVRA (Association of Accounting Agencies’ Owners) on a sample of 100 entrepreneurs and small enterprises; Ipsos Strategic Marketing survey on a sample of 250 businesses
Survey results “Business opinions – para-fiscal charges” System of non-tax charges is insufficiently transparent, unpredictable and unstable. 58% respondents state believe they are facing payment of para-fiscal charges in they day-to-day work. 67% respondents find the state responsible for introducing para-fiscal charges. 29% respondents find the local government responsible for introducing para-fiscal charges. A detailed analysis is enclosed in accompanying materials.
Financial impact analysis of para-fiscal charges to doing business The analysis involved 12 business entities: • 4 large companies • 3 middle-sized companies • 3 small companies • 2 entrepreneurs
Trends of national and local fees for middle-sized companies
Share of fees in the structure of expenses for observed businesses
Share of fees in the structure of expenses for observed businesses