SECTION 11.5. THE CHAIN RULE. THE CHAIN RULE. Recall that the Chain Rule for functions of a single variable gives the following rule for differentiating a composite function.
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
THE CHAIN RULE • Recall that the Chain Rule for functions of a single variable gives the following rule for differentiating a composite function. • If y =f(x) and x = g(t), where f and g are differentiable functions, then y is indirectly a differentiable function of t, and 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE • For functions of more than one variable, the Chain Rule has several versions. • Each gives a rule for differentiating a composite function. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE • The first version (Theorem 2) deals with the case where z =f(x, y) and each of the variables x and y is, in turn, a function of a variable t. • This means that z is indirectly a function of t, z =f(g(t), h(t)), and the Chain Rule gives a formula for differentiating z as a function of t. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE • We assume that f is differentiable (Definition 7 in Section 11.4). • Recall that this is the case when fx and fy are continuous (Theorem 8 in Section 11.4). 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 1) Suppose that z =f(x, y) is a differentiable function of x and y, where x = g(t) and y = h(t) are both differentiable functions of t. Then, z is a differentiable function of t and 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 1) PROOF • A change of ∆t in t produces changes of ∆x in x and ∆y in y. • These, in turn, produce a change of ∆z in z. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 1) PROOF • Then, from Definition 7 in Section 11.4, we have:where e1 → 0 and e2 → 0 as (∆x, ∆y) → (0,0). • If the functions e1 and e2 are not defined at (0, 0), we can define them to be 0 there. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 1) PROOF • If we now let ∆t → 0 , then ∆x = g(t + ∆t) –g(t) → 0as g is differentiable and thus continuous. • Similarly, ∆y → 0. • This, in turn, means that e1→ 0 and e2→ 0. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 1) • Since we often write ∂z/∂x in place of ∂f/∂x, we can rewrite the Chain Rule in the form 11.5
Example 1 • If z =x2y + 3xy4, where x = sin 2t and y = cos t, find dz/dt when t = 0. • SOLUTION • The Chain Rule gives: 11.5
Example 1 SOLUTION • It’s not necessary to substitute the expressions for x and y in terms of t. • We simply observe that, when t = 0, we have x = sin 0 = 0 and y = cos 0 = 1. • Thus, 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 1) • The derivative in Example 1 can be interpreted as: • The rate of change of z with respect to t as the point (x, y) moves along the curve C with parametric equations x = sin 2t, y = cos t. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 1) • In particular, when t = 0, • The point (x, y) is (0, 1). • dz/dt = 6 is the rate of increase as we move along the curve Cthrough (0, 1). 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 1) • If, for instance, z =T(x, y) = x2y + 3xy4 represents the temperature at the point (x, y), then • The composite function z =T(sin 2t, cos t) represents the temperature at points on C. • The derivative dz/dt represents the rate at which the temperature changes along C. 11.5
Example 2 • The pressure P (in kilopascals), volume V (in liters), and temperature T (in kelvins) of a mole of an ideal gas are related by the equation PV = 8.31T • Find the rate at which the pressure is changing when: • The temperature is 300 K and increasing at a rate of 0.1 K/s. • The volume is 100 L and increasing at a rate of 0.2 L/s. 11.5
Example 2 SOLUTION • If t represents the time elapsed in seconds, then, at the given instant, we have: • T = 300 • dT/dt = 0.1 • V = 100 • dV/dt = 0.2 11.5
Example 2 SOLUTION • Since , the Chain Rule gives: • The pressure is decreasing at about 0.042 kPa/s. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 1) • We now consider the situation where z =f(x, y), but each of x and y is a function of two variables s and t: x = g(s, t), y =h(s, t). • Then, z is indirectly a function of s and t,and we wish to find ∂z/∂s and ∂z/∂t. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 1) • Recall that, in computing ∂z/∂t, we hold s fixed and compute the ordinary derivative of z with respect to t. • So, we can apply Theorem 2 to obtain: • A similar argument holds for ∂z/∂s. • So,we have proved the following version of the Chain Rule. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (CASE 2) Suppose z =f(x, y) is a differentiable function of x and y, where x = g(s, t) and y = h(s, t) are differentiable functions of s and t. Then, 11.5
Example 3 • If z = ex sin y, where x =st2 and y =s2t, find ∂z/∂s and ∂z/∂t. • SOLUTION • Applying Case 2 of the Chain Rule, we get the following results. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE • Case 2 of the Chain Rule contains three types of variables: • s and t are independent variables. • x and y are called intermediate variables. • z is the dependent variable. • Notice that Theorem 3 has one term for each intermediate variable. • Each term resembles the one-dimensional Chain Rule in Equation 1. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE • To remember the Chain Rule, it’s helpful to draw a tree diagram in Figure 2. • We draw branches from the dependent variable z to the intermediate variables x and y to indicate that z is a function of x and y. 11.5
TREE DIAGRAM • Then, we draw branches from x and y to the independent variables s and t. • On each branch, we write the corresponding partial derivative. 11.5
TREE DIAGRAM • To find ∂z/∂s, we find the product of the partial derivatives along each path from z to s and then add these products: • Similarly, we find ∂z/∂t by using the paths from z to t. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE • Now, we consider the general situation in which a dependent variable u is a function of n intermediate variables x1, …, xn. • Each of this is, in turn, a function of m independent variables t1 , …, tm. • Notice that there are n terms—one for each intermediate variable. • The proof is similar to that of Case 1. 11.5
THE CHAIN RULE (GENERAL VERSION) Suppose u is a differentiable function of the n variables x1, x2, …, xn and each xj is a differentiable function of the m variables t1, t2, …, tm. Then, u is a function of t1, t2, …, tmand for each i = 1, 2, …, m. 11.5
Example 4 • Write out the Chain Rule for the case where w =f(x, y, z, t) and x =x(u, v), y =y(u, v), z =z(u, v), t =t(u, v) • SOLUTION • We apply Theorem 4 with n = 4 and m = 2. 11.5
Example 4 SOLUTION • Figure 3 shows the tree diagram. • We haven’t written the derivatives on the branches. • However, it’s understood that, if a branch leads from y to u, the partial derivative for that branch is ∂y/∂u. 11.5
Example 4 SOLUTION • With the aid of the tree diagram, we can now write the required expressions: 11.5
Example 5 • If u =x4y +y2z3, where x =rset, y =rs2e–t, z =r2s sin t, find the value of ∂u/∂s when r = 2, s = 1, t = 0 11.5
Example 5 SOLUTION • With the help of this tree diagram in Figure 4, we have: 11.5
Example 5 SOLUTION • When r = 2, s = 1, and t = 0, we have: x = 2, y = 2, z = 0 • Thus, 11.5
Example 6 • If g(s, t) = f(s2–t2, t2–s2) and f is differentiable, show that g satisfies the equation 11.5
Example 6 SOLUTION • Let x =s2–t2 and y =t2–s2. • Then, g(s, t) = f(x, y), and the Chain Rule gives: 11.5
Example 7(b) SOLUTION • Putting these expressions into Equation 5 and using the equality of the mixed second-order derivatives, we obtain the following result. 11.5
IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION • The Chain Rule can be used to give a more complete description of the process of implicit differentiation that was introduced in Sections 2.6 and 11.3. • We suppose that an equation of the form F(x, y) = 0 defines y implicitly as a differentiable function of x. • That is, y = f(x), where F(x, f(x)) = 0 for all x in the domain of f. 11.5
IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION • If F is differentiable, we can apply Case 1 of the Chain Rule to differentiate both sides of the equation F(x, y) = 0 with respect to x. • Since both x and y are functions of x, we obtain: 11.5
IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION • However, dx/dx = 1. • So, if ∂F/∂y ≠ 0, we solve for dy/dx and obtain: 11.5
Connexion au compte
Connectez-vous pour publier votre contenu sur SlideServe.