1 / 16

Sarawak's National Mission Framework: Addressing Poverty and Inequality

Explore Sarawak's strategies to tackle socio-economic disparities based on income, region, and ethnicity. Learn about the Poverty Line Index, measures of inequality, and state-wide challenges in allocating resources and addressing poverty. Discover the complexities of poverty, inequality, and outdated indicators in Sarawak, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and inclusive policies.

renardo-brophy
Télécharger la présentation

Sarawak's National Mission Framework: Addressing Poverty and Inequality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Region, Ethnicity & Class Sarawak

  2. National Mission Framework • Globally competitive, nationally integrated, social equitable • Thrust 3: To address persistent socio-economic inequalities constructively and productively • (income) poverty, strata, region, ethnicity • strategies/approaches

  3. Poverty: knowing & doing • What is poor? • Where are the poor? • Who are the poor? • Why are the poor? • What to do?

  4. Poverty Line • Welcome revision • most revealing for Sarawak (and Sabah): 26% incr in PLI - doubling of % poor, 3.8% to 7.5% • Oddities • between Sabah (>rural PLI) & Sarawak (>urban PLI) • ratio of food to total PLI • 60% of PLI (63% Sarawak; 57% Sabah), up from 50%

  5. Poverty Line (contd) • USD1/USD2 said to be too low for advanced developing country, but • USD1 = RM515 (old PLI RM588) • USD2 = RM1030 (new PLI RM691; RM765 Sarawak, RM888 Sabah)

  6. Inequality • What? • How much? • Who? • Why?

  7. Measuring Inequality • What to measure? • Income/Education/Health/Access • At what level? • State/District/Mukim/Village --Group/Household/Individual • Do the measures correlate? • E.g. income-educational attainment

  8. Measures correlate? • Indian: Bumiputera income ratio = 1.2, yet • 43% of Indians in Category 7&8 (MASCO 98), 6% in Agri, 7% in Crafts/Related Occupations, i.e., 56% in bottom 4 occupation categories • 27% of Bumiputera in Category 7&8, 17% in Agri, 7% in Crafts/Related Occupations, I.e., 50% in bottom 4 categories • next chart shows higher education attainment

  9. Measures measure? • Household income: • # of employed per household • is that a problem? • Average HH income vs Median HH income • Median has fallen further behind from 1999 to 2002 • Not available (anymore): wage surveys

  10. Region • State • Sarawak (and Sabah) as regions • Strata (Rural/Urban)

  11. Issue • State-wide measures are problematic in states of Peninsula, but almost meaningless in the case of Sarawak (and Sabah) • GDP -- too gross; incl oil & gas • State poverty rate • Health -- malaria; vaccination; access • Infrastructure • Thus, allocations and expenditure by state? • MP per capita allocations for Sarawak significantly lower than national per capita average, from low 63% (4MP) of national average to high 89% (8MP); 9MP 79%

  12. Penan • Pop, 2000: 12,000+ • Background: majority settled down within living memory • Most in most remote reaches; tough terrain • Timber extraction; plantation development • Vast majority poor, by almost any criteria • now poorer in food terms • ironically, less ‘mainstreamed’ better off, foodwise

  13. Useless indicators: Health example • State-wide statistics: can attain 99% with all Penan excluded • Who becomes invisible? • shock of Jan 2005 -- a local tsunami • Federal Govt: misplaced programmes • IMCI ruling

More Related