1 / 73

DSC Delivery Sub-Group

DSC Delivery Sub-Group. 1 st April 2019. Agenda (1). Agenda (2). 3. Defects update. 3a. AQ Defects 3b. Defect dashboard. 3a. AQ Defects. The AQ Defects spreadsheet is saved in the DSG pages on xoserve.com listed as 3a. AQ Defects. 3b. Defect Summary. Defect Summary Stats.

rene
Télécharger la présentation

DSC Delivery Sub-Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DSC Delivery Sub-Group 1st April 2019

  2. Agenda (1)

  3. Agenda (2)

  4. 3. Defects update • 3a. AQ Defects • 3b. Defect dashboard

  5. 3a. AQ Defects The AQ Defects spreadsheet is saved in the DSG pages on xoserve.comlisted as 3a. AQ Defects

  6. 3b. Defect Summary

  7. Defect Summary Stats • Stats as per HPQC extract taken on Wednesday 27th March 2019.

  8. R3.09 The below fixes were all deployed to production between the 1st and 8th March. The below fix was deployed as urgent. Release 3.10 is scheduled for 5th April 2019.

  9. Amendment Invoice Impacting Defects

  10. Amendment Invoice Impacting Defects - Closed The below defects were deployed / closed since the last slides were issued.

  11. 4. Portfolio Delivery Overview POAP • 4a. The Portfolio POAP is saved in the DSG pages on xoserve.com listed as 4. Portfolio Overview POAP • The only change the Portfolio Overview POAP are: • 4b. Retail and Network Delivery Overview

  12. R&N Timeline June-19 Sept-19 (EUC) Nov-19 Minor Release D4 CSS CC RETRO UIG Mod 678 – GB Charging Feb-20 June-20 Nov-20 • Assumes February Release continue to be documentation only release • Assumes RETRO will be Nov 2020 Major Release Delivery • Please note that this is all potential activity within UK Link over the next 24 months

  13. 2019 / 2020 R&N Delivery Timeline Imp PIS Jun-19 Build Testing PIS Build Testing Imp #1 PIS Imp #2 EUC Capture Initiation UAT MT Imp PIS Design Build & UT ST SIT Reg / Pen Test Nov-19 Potential Activity MR HLD CSS CC System / Internal Acceptance / Pen Testing SIT / Reg Test MT IMP Detailed Design Retro Nov-2020 UIG 2020 Mod678 – Uk Link Impacts UKL PT ST SIT SUPT UKL RT IDR PIS UKL ST UKL AT & RT UAT UT IMP • Assumes February Release continue to be documentation only release • Assumes RETRO will be Nov 2020 Major Release Delivery • Please note that this is all potential activity within UK Link over the next 24 months

  14. 2019 / 2020 R&N Governance Timeline Jun-19 BER Approval 09/01/19 Sep-19 / EUC BER Approval 09/01/19 BER Approval 10/04/19 BER Approval 10/04/18 Change Pack Issue 08/05/19 EQR Approval 06/02/19 Nov-19 MR Potential Activity ChMC Scope Approval 10/04/19 Feb-20 Potential Activity Governance Approval dates tbc RETRO Potential Activity Key Governance Approval dates tbc Complete On track At risk • Assumes February Release continue to be documentation only release • Assumes RETRO will be Nov 2020 Major Release Delivery • Please note that this is all potential activity within UK Link over the next 24 months

  15. Change Index – R&N Allocated Change

  16. Change Index – R&N Unallocated External Impacting Changes

  17. 5. Major Release Update • 5a. Release 3 • 5b. Minor Release Drop 3 • 5c. June 2019 • 5d. EUC 2019 • 5e. November 19

  18. 5a. XRN4572 UK Link Release 3

  19. UK Link Release 3 - Plan Milestone date forecast to be met Milestone date forecast to be at risk Planning/Milestone date to be confirmed Milestone date forecast to be missed Milestone completed RAG Key – Milestones are end dates; *Closedown expected to finish this week** Synergised ST and AT date

  20. 5b. XRN4802 – MiR Drop 3 - Status Update

  21. 2018 2019 May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Build UT Imp Testing XRN4802 – MiR Drop 3 • Minor Release Key Milestone Dates: • 22nd March – PIS completed and Handover to Xoserve Operate accepted – Project now closed Apr Feb-19 Minor Release Timeline Design Build ST & Assurance CM PT / RT IMP PIS Feb-19 Minor Release Timeline

  22. 5c. XRN4732 - June 19 Release - Status Update

  23. XRN4732 - June 19 Release Timelines • Key Milestone Dates: • Build and UT has completed • ST+SIT has now commenced

  24. 5d. XRN4665 – EUC Release

  25. XRN 4665 - EUC Release Timelines • Key Milestone Dates: • Build & UT activities tracking to plan for completion by planned milestone date • ST/SIT activities commenced as per plan and currently tracking to schedule • Internal discussions ongoing to agree PIS duration (to include first usage monitoring)

  26. XRN4828 - Nov 19 Release - Status Update

  27. 2019 2020 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec d e e r g A C e Mobilisation M Build UT Imp p h o Testing C c S – 9 1 e n u J XRN4828 - Nov 19 Release Timelines • Key Milestone Dates: • Receive supplier responses – 13/02/19 • Supplier contract approval – 05/04/19 • Approve and issue EQR – 04/02/19 • Gain Business Case approval at IRC - 13/03/19 • PID approval 12/04/19 • Detailed Delivery Plan approved – 05/04/19 • BER Approval – 10/04/19 • Design Change Packs Submitted to Industry –08/05/19 • Test Plan approval – 05/04/19 Jan Nov-19 Timeline IMP (Inc IDR) PIS Design Build & UT System Test SIT UAT RT & PT Market Trials Closedown 04/02: EQR Approval 08/05: Change Pack Submission 10/04: BER Approval

  28. Assurance In Place of Market Trials • Option 1 – Do Nothing • Xoserve would not look to provide any alternative to provide assurance in place of Marker Trials • Confirmation of successful Acceptance, Performance & Regression Testing would be confirmed • Option 2 – Provide Test Summary Report • Xoserve will produce a summary report at the completion of testing and ahead of Implementation providing details of successful test completion including Test Case pass rate and defect figures

  29. 6. New Change ProposalsFor Ratification of the Prioritisation Scores • No agenda items for this section

  30. 7. Change Proposal Initial View Representations • 7a. XRN - XRN4871 - Modification 0665 – Changes to Ratchet Regime • 7b. XRN4645 – The Rejection of Incrementing Reads Submitted for an Isolated Supply Meter Point (RGMA Flows) • 7c. XRN4780 - Inclusion of Meter Asset Provider Identity (MAP Id) in the UK Link system (CSS Consequential Change) • 7d. XRN4789 - Updating Shipper Reporting Packs and glossary

  31. 7a. XRN - XRN4871 - Modification 0665 – Changes to Ratchet Regime • Slides to be provided by 01/04/19

  32. 7b. XRN4645 – The Rejection of Incrementing Reads Submitted for an Isolated Supply Meter Point (RGMA Flows) • Slides to be provided by 01/04/19

  33. 7c. XRN4780 - Inclusion of Meter Asset Provider Identity (MAP Id) in the UK Link system (CSS Consequential Change) • Slides to be provided by 01/04/19

  34. 7d. Reporting XRN delivery recommendations Seek agreement from DSG on how to progress reporting changes

  35. Shipper Pack, PARR Reporting XRN delivery recommendation • There are currently a number of Reporting Changes being progressed through capture in the Customer Change Lifecycle Team. • These changes will predominately require resource from the same teams and the same tables within SAP BW. They will also need similar changes and testing to be carried out to deliver the changes. • The purpose of this document is to seek agreement from DSG on how to progress these changes in order to do the following: • Limit the amount of regret spend • Deliver the changes to Shippers in the optimum timeframe • Provide benefit to shippers by giving meaningful usable management information • Provide a medium term solution to reporting requirements until such times as the Reporting Review is complete. • The following options and recommendations have been made by Xoserve and we are seeking feedback on the recommendation from DSG Members to then be able to present the recommendation to Change Management Committee for ratification.

  36. Shipper Pack, PARR Reporting XRN delivery recommendation Problem Statement & Objective: There are a number of outstanding change requests in progress which overlap in terms of data source and reporting purpose. The objective of this recommendation is to agree the best way to approach these XRN’s to minimise regret spend and provide value and benefit to customers as soon as possible. Description: XRN4789 has been raised to address the format of the Shipper Reporting Pack. It will look to add value by changing the glossary to make it more user friendly and also align the data reported post Nexus to product class from AQ band. It also looks to change the lay out to make the data easier to interpret by Shippers Benefits / Financial Impact: Indicative costs to change in isolation - £20k Option 1 – Progress the Shipper Pack report changes only (XRN4789): Indicative costs – £20k • Pros: Cons: • Risk: Regret spend may be incurred by shippers – due to the number of similar reporting changes code may be changed for this and then again changed soon after. • Risk: Making these changes in isolation might lead to delays in delivering the PARR Reports due to availability of resource and testing environments. • Changes will be progressed as planned and change can be assigned to delivery team as early as 3rd April. • Shipper Packs will be structured better so that the data can be divided up by departments to work. • Aligns the Shipper Packs to the changes made as part of Nexus – reporting by Product Class rather than AQ. • Shippers will be provided with some of the supporting data to review when challenged by PAC.

  37. Shipper Pack, PARR Reporting XRN delivery recommendation Problem Statement & Objective: There are a number of outstanding change requests in progress which overlap in terms of data source and reporting purpose. The objective of this recommendation is to agree the best way to approach these XRN’s to minimise regret spend and provide value and benefit to customers as soon as possible. Benefits / Financial Impact: Reduce regret spend. Indicative costs to change in isolation – unknown currently pending outcome of this recommendation (to avoid regret spend). Description: XRN4864, XRN4779 and XRN4876 have been raised to provide additional data items for PAFA and the PARR Reports. This data can then assist shippers in monitoring their own performance and addressing any issues prior to them being notified by PAC. Option 2 – Progress the PARR report changes ( XRN4864, XRN4779 and XRN4876) only: Indicative costs – not currently known • Pros: Cons: • Risk : May still need to make the changes to the shipper packs should it be discovered in detailed design that the best place to display the data is in the Shipper Packs – currently reporting at AQ and not Product class. • Risk: May require additional investment for providing the data at lower level granularity due to size and transfer of data – possible will need SFTP route or secure location in the cloud to host. • Progressing these changes together will provide the majority of lower level data needed by Shippers to take corrective action should they be notified by PAC of poor performance. • Some of the additional data being delivered will also fulfil some of the UIG Taskforce recommendations and committee approved routes for delivery therefore is a strategic initiative. • Avoids making changes to the Shipper Packs which may become obsolete once the PARR Reports have more supporting information therefore minimising regret spend.

  38. Shipper Pack, PARR Reporting XRN delivery recommendation Problem Statement & Objective: There are a number of outstanding change requests in progress which overlap in terms of data source and reporting purpose. The objective of this recommendation is to agree the best way to approach these XRN’s to minimise regret spend and provide value and benefit to customers as soon as possible. Description: Within XRN4789 there is a request to update the glossary to make it more relevant. As per Option two there are four PARR Reporting changes which will have similar code changes and require the same resource to develop and test. Benefits / Financial Impact: Reduce regret spend. Indicative costs to change in isolation – unknown currently pending outcome of this recommendation (to avoid regret spend). Option 3 – Progress the glossary changes for the Shipper Packs and deliver all the PARR Report XRNs together - not currently known • Pros: Cons: • Risk: May still need to make the changes to the shipper packs should it be discovered in detailed design that the best place to display the data is in the Shipper Packs – currently reporting at AQ band and not Product class. • Risk: May require additional investment for providing the data at lower level granularity due to size and transfer of data via the Shipper Pack – possible will need SFTP route or secure location in the cloud to host. • Progressing the Shipper Pack Glossary changes will provide immediate benefit to all Shippers including new entrants to the market • Progressing these changes together will provide the majority of lower level data needed by Shippers to take corrective action should they be notified by PAC of poor performance. • Some of the additional data being delivered will also fulfil some of the UIG Taskforce recommendations and committee approved routes for delivery therefore is a strategic initiative. • Avoids making changes to the Shipper Packs which may become obsolete once the PARR Reports have more supporting information therefore minimising regret spend.

  39. Shipper Pack, PARR Reporting XRN delivery recommendation Q2 ‘19 Q3 ’19 (indicative) Recommended Option 3: Progress the glossary changes for the Shipper Packs and deliver all the PARR Report XRNs together • Option 3 is recommended for the following reasons: • It delivers on all changes, albeit partially for XRN4789 but the glossary changes add immediate value. • Minimises the level of regret spend – if tables in the system are being modified at the same time for all changes. development and testing can be done once rather than several times. • Delivers a strategic approach to change for customers. • Adds value for UIG by giving access to the data that impacts shippers and UIG. • Provides a mid term approach to reporting until delivery of XRN4857 (Reporting Review) and the rationalisation of all reports. Shipper Pack Glossary changes UIG Reports PARR Report Changes Shipper Pack Changes

  40. 8. Undergoing Solution Options Impact Assessment Review • 8a. XRN4833 - Roll Out of Business Intelligence and Data Discovery Capability • Verbal update to be presented by Jason McLeod

  41. 9. Solution Options Impact Assessment Review Completed • 9a. XRN4713 - Actual read following estimated transfer read calculating AQ of 1 (linked to XRN4690) • 9b. XRN4803 - Removal of validation for AQ Correction Reason 4

  42. 9a. XRN4713 - Actual Read following Estimated Transfer Read Calculating AQ of 1 - Enduring Solution High Level Solution Option Assessment

  43. Change Overview

  44. 3 Option 3 - High Level Impact Assessment Gemini Impact SAP PO SAP ISU Marketflow CMS API SAP BW DES

  45. 3 Option 3 - System Impact Assessment

  46. 3 Option 3 - Process Impact Assessment

  47. 9b. XRN4803– Removal of validation for AQ Correction Reason 4 High Level System Solution Impact Assessment

  48. Change Overview

  49. 1 Option 1 - High Level Impact Assessment Impact Gemini SAP PO SAP ISU CMS Marketflow API SAP BW DES

  50. 1 Option 1 - System Impact Assessment

More Related