1 / 16

Examining the Canadian Model of Universal Health System

This study analyzes the Canadian universal health care system in comparison to new U.S. proposals. It delves into essential components, outcomes, federal principles, and challenges faced by both countries.

renee-bradshaw
Télécharger la présentation

Examining the Canadian Model of Universal Health System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A SINGLE PAYER, UNIVERSAL HEALTH SYSTEM The Canadian Model in light of new U.S. Proposals Gregory P. Marchildon Pierre-Gerlier Forest Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Washington, DC, September 23, 2003

  2. THE CANADIAN MODEL • Does one exist? • If so, can we describe its unique and/or essential components? • How much of Canadian health care actually within the model? • How did we end up with this particular model?

  3. EXISTENCE OF MODEL? • Goes beyond having unique system of public health care (after all, every OECD country does!) • Having aspects that are of sufficient interest to others • Canada recognized by others as having a model worth examining and (in some cases) emulating

  4. MODEL: COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES AND SERVICE • Generally good health outcomes • Public and Population Health • Nature of Health Services • Services provided • Training of providers • Expectations of patients

  5. FOUR ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF MODEL • Hospital care • Primary physician care • Provincial-federal tax-financed system • Provincial control and administration, private and mixed delivery, and federal principles

  6. HOSPITAL CARE • Hospitalization introduced in SK in 1947 • HIDSA (1957) and national implementation (1958-61) • Universal access without user fee • Public and NFP delivery unaffected • Hospital Construction = more beds

  7. PRIMARY PHYSICIAN CARE • 1962: Saskatoon Compromise • Guarantee of provincial autonomy • Basket of services and remuneration: medical associations and provincial governments • MCA of 1966 and implementation on national basis (1968-72) • Universal access with limited (but eventually no) user fees • Private FFS delivery within provincial plans and federal principles

  8. F/P TAX FINANCED SYSTEM • Versus social insurance and co-pays • Tax revenues (GRF) of both orders of government • Complex history of F/P funding arrangements: a) shared-cost; b) EPF cash/tax; c) CHST block • Progressive financing depends on tax sources and incidence

  9. FEDERAL PRINCIPLES AND FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEM • Nature of HIDSA and bilateral agreements • Broad principles of MCA • Severing of funding from policy objectives (EPF) • The Canada Health Act (CHA), 1984 • Long-term decline in federal funding • Sept. 2000 Agreement and Feb. 2003 Accord

  10. PROVINCIAL CONTROL AND ADMINISTRATION • Constitutional authority and responsibility primarily provincial • Developed provincially since 1945 • Innovation and variation across provinces • Provincial Studies, Reports, and Current Initiatives

  11. PUBLIC, PRIVATE AND MIXED DELIVERY • Predominantly non-governmental • Historic evolution of hospitals • Physician “Entrepreneurs” • Emergence of RHAs • Big business (PFP & NFP) largely absent from acute & primary care

  12. CHARACTERISTICS OF CANADIAN MODEL • Narrow but deep coverage (complete coverage for 42% of all health services • Parallel private tier prohibited or discouraged (private insurance for CHA-covered services) • But enormous variation in funding, administration and delivery of non-insured services including prescription drugs, vision care, dental care, etc.

  13. WHAT HEALTH SPENDING INCLUDED IN MODEL • Traditional hospital services and primary care services: 42.4% • Provincial plans provide non-CHA services beyond this: 25.2% • Private health services: 27.4% • Add in another 5% for direct federal services

  14. CURRENT CHALLENGES TO CANADIAN MODEL • Universal versus targeted access (cost) • Single-payer administrative system (competition) • Prohibition on user fees for CHA services (incentive effects) • Legislated single-tier • Declining tolerance for variation within Canada and with US: quality, access, and equity

  15. GENERAL CHALLENGES TO CANADIAN HEALTH CARE • Timely access (waiting lists) • Quality services and evidence-based practice • Movement away from hospital care • Nature and quality of primary care • Drug therapies: appropriateness and cost • Providers: number, morale, etc. • Patient involvement v. citizen engagement?

  16. CHALLENGES re: CANADIAN AND U.S. MODELS • Governance • Finance • Coverage/ethics • Outcomes

More Related