1 / 54

Circumstellar disks - a primer

Circumstellar disks - a primer. Ast622 The Interstellar Medium. Partially based on Les Houches lecture by Michiel Hogeheijde (http://www-laog.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/heberges/Houches08/index.htm). Motivation. The last step in the transport of the ISM to stellar scales

reuben
Télécharger la présentation

Circumstellar disks - a primer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Circumstellar disks - a primer Ast622 The Interstellar Medium Partially based on Les Houches lecture by Michiel Hogeheijde (http://www-laog.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/heberges/Houches08/index.htm)

  2. Motivation • The last step in the transport of the ISM to stellar scales • The first step in the formation of planetary systems

  3. Disks are an inevitable ( ubiquitous?) consequence of angular momentum conservation

  4. Indirect evidence for disks • Emission line (H) stars above the main sequence  accretion • Infrared-millimeter excess emission  reprocessing of starlight by a non-spherical geometry • Ultraviolet excess and X-ray emission  accretion hot spots and star-disk interface

  5. Direct evidence for disks(i.e. imaging) Smith & Terrile 1984

  6. Direct evidence for disks(i.e. imaging)

  7. SED classification (Lada 1987) • αIR = -dlog(νFν)/dlog(ν) • = log(25F25/2F2)/log(2/25) Fig from Andre

  8. SED theory • Chiang & Goldreich (1997) following pioneering work by Adams, Lada & Shu (1987), Kenyon & Hartmann (1987) • Also see reviews by Beckwith (1999) and Dullemond et al. (2006)

  9. Flat blackbody disk

  10. Observed Flat blackbody disk Fig. 1.— SED for the flat blackbody disk, with contributions from star and disk identified. The n = 4/3 law is evident between 30 μm and 1 mm. The turnover near 1 mm is due to our truncation of the disk at ao ≈ 270 AU. Chiang & Goldreich 1997

  11. Flared blackbody disk The vertical component of gravity will decrease with radius along with the surface density. Hydrostatic equilibrium then implies the disk scale height increases with radius: the disk is flared. The outer regions of the disk of a flared disk intercept more starlight than a flat disk and the mid-to-far infrared emission is stronger.

  12. Flared blackbody disk Fig. 2.— SED for the flared blackbody disk. At mid-IR wavelengths, Lν ∝ ν−2/3. At longer wavelengths, Lν ∝ ν3.

  13. Radiative equilibrium disk Fig. 3.— Radiative transfer in the passive disk. Stellar radiation strikes the surface at an angle α and is absorbed within visible optical depth unity. Dust particles in this first absorption layer are superheated to a temperature Tds. About half of the emission from the superheated layer emerges as dilute blackbody radiation. The remaining half heats the interior to a temperature Ti.

  14. Radiative equilibrium disk

  15. Radiative equilibrium disk

  16. Radiative equilibrium flared disk Fig. 6.— SED for the hydrostatic, radiative equilibrium disk. At mid-IR wavelengths, the superheated surface radiates approximately 2–3 times more power than the interior. Longward of 300 μm, n gradually steepens from about 3 to 3 + β as the disk becomes increasingly optically thin.

  17. Radiative equilibrium flared disk

  18. Adding in solid state features Fig. 10.— SED for the hydrostatic, radiative equilibrium disk using a grain emissivity profile motivated by data from Mathis (1990). For wavelengths shorter than 0.3 μm, our assumed emissivity is unity; longward of 0.3 μm, it obeys a (single) power-law relation ∊λ = (0.3 μm/λ)1.4, on which are superposed two Gaussians centered on 10 and 20 μm, having amplitudes that are 3 times their local continuum emissivity and FWHM equal to 3 and 9 μm, respectively.

  19. Flaring + hot inner rim Dullemond et al. 2006, PPV review

  20. Dependence of SED on disk geometry

  21. Dependence of SED on disk geometry

  22. Dependence of SED on disk geometry

  23. Dependence of SED on disk geometry

  24. Dependence of SED on disk geometry

  25. SED + spatial modeling  disk mass, radius and temperature and surface density profiles, T ~ R-q,  ~ R-p Andrews & Williams 2007

  26. Annual Reviews 1981 Accretion disk theory L = GMMdot/R Same temperature profile (and hence SED) as as passive flat blackbody disk, T  R-3/4 Flared disk SEDs dominated by stellar irradiation. Accretion critical for understanding disk evolution

  27. magnetospheric accretion Muzerolle et al. (1998, 2001) accretion shocks spreading Gullbring et al. (1997) Viscous evolution As disk accretes to star, conservation of momentum implies disk spreads out; mass, accretion, decrease with time, radius increases with time. Andrews & Williams 2007

  28. Dust mineralogy observed olivine pyroxene hydrosilicate ISM silicate van Boekel et al. (2004)

  29. Grain growth knn b b~ 2 b~ 0 submillimeter emission “efficiency” ISM grains pebbles/snowballs b related to size of largest solids in disk e.g. Pollack et al. (1994), Draine (2006)

  30. Grain growth disk ~ 1 ISM ~ 2 Isella et al. 2007

  31. Grain growth Andrews PhD thesis 2007

  32. Dust settling Dullemond et al. 2004

  33. The gaseous disk

  34. Molecular Hydrogen H2 is difficult to detect • no permanent dipole -> no dipole rotational transitions; only weak quadrupole transition in mid-IR that require hundred K or more to excite • conflicting reports about detection • fluorescent H2 emission in UV (electronic transitions) and near-infrared (vibrational) has been detected but is difficult to analyze quantitatively

  35. Molecular Hydrogen Lahuis et al. (2007)

  36. Near infrared disk ro-vibrational lines Boogert et al. 2002

  37. Recent Spitzer IRS results Watson et al. 2007 Carr & Najita 2008

  38. Atomic fine structure lines in disks:probes of the giant planet forming region Herschel GASPS Key Program

  39. Atomic fine structure lines in disks:probes of the giant planet forming region Herschel GASPS Key Program

  40. Millimeter observations:the cold outer reservoir • <1% by mass of gas consists of CO, and smaller quantities of other molecules and atoms • CO easily detected in mm rotational transitions • shows rotation patterns • inferred masses 10-100 times smaller than from dust: depletion • CO freezes out on dust grains for T<20 K Simon et al. (2000)

  41. Millimeter observations:the cold outer reservoir Qi PhD thesis 2000

  42. Disk chemistry • most molecules now understood to be present only in a warm layer at intermediate height and close to the star • frozen out in mid-plane • photo-dissociated in the disk surface Semenov et al. (2008)

  43. Disk chemistry:resolving the D/H ratio Qi et al. (2008)

  44. Disk lifetimes Haisch et al. 2001 fdisk > 80% at ~1 Myr fdisk ~ 50% at ~3 Myr fdisk ~ few% at >10 Myr Hillenbrand 2005

  45. Disk lifetimes NIR excess  outer disk Inner and outer disks have similar dissipation timescales Andrews & Williams 2005

  46. Class I disks Class II disks Class III disks Disk evolution (at mm) sub-mm emission (disk masses) decreases with IR SED evolution sub-mm SED changes with IR SED evolution (particle growth) Sean Andrews PhD 2007

  47. Transitional disks Viscous evolution is expected to be quicker at small radii but transitional disks, with mid-infrared dips in their SED and cold outer rings of dust and gas are rare (and possibly only seen around binaries?) Brown et al. 2008

  48. Disk clearing through photoevaporation Alexander “UV-switch” model where stellar wind very rapidly erodes disk (from inside out but in only ~105yr) as accretion rate drops below photoevaporation rate Alexander et al. 2006

  49. External photoevaporation O’Dell, McCaughrean, Bally Williams et al. 2005 Rapid mass loss, 10-5 M☉/yr, at center, but massive disks survive at large distances (Rita Mann PhD)

More Related