1 / 17

Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging

Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging. Luke Powers Chris Weaver Jonathan Fermo Alfred Luk BME 273, Group 22 04/06/2005. Phase-Contrast Radiography. Traditional radiography uses differences in absorption to develop images

rfitch
Télécharger la présentation

Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging Luke Powers Chris Weaver Jonathan Fermo Alfred Luk BME 273, Group 22 04/06/2005

  2. Phase-Contrast Radiography • Traditional radiography uses differences in absorption to develop images • Phase-contrast Radiography (PC-R) uses differences in refraction and diffraction of the x-ray beam as it passes through the object • Results in enhanced edge effects in image compared to those found in absorption images

  3. Objectives • Build a device that aids in testing Phase Contrast Radiography parameters • Computer controlled movement of the object and detector • Maintain high control accuracy in order to pick up edges in tissue

  4. PC-R Potential • Edge Enhancements • Has potential to detect objects that are invisible on conventional radiography due to edge enhancements in images. • Monochromatic • Tunable to specific wavelengths • Monochromatic beam reduces excess radiation dosage to patient.

  5. Spatial Coherence • Description of the divergence of a wave • Desire a very large spatial coherence (d): decrease focal spot size (f) increase source-object distance (R1) • Waves similar enough for interference patterns to form when passing through edges of object

  6. Edge Effects • Waves near edges are bent • Waves not touching or passing through are not affected • Edge enhancement seen on film • Angle shift insignificant at close distances

  7. Producing Phase Contrast • Image has two components: absorption and phase • Wavelength is tunable due to monochromatic source • Components functions of position • Goal is to divide out absorption • Absorption component  detector touching object

  8. Magnification Effect • Changing R1+R2 • Size of two images are not equal • Scale images to account for magnification • Most likely shrink I to Iabs for division • Poor accuracy will result in production of false edges

  9. Our Device • Main Uses: • Optimizing distances for PC imaging of specific objects/tissues • Produce reproducible images • Produce no false edge effects • Images using scattering, defines pixel resolution < 150 microns • Additional Uses: • Rotational movement for CT images

  10. Programming • Inputs: • LabView GUI: positions, energy • Outputs: • Time/Date • Image # • Angle and x, y, z positions • Energy Used

  11. Advisors • Advisors: • Frank E. Carroll, M.D. • Gary Shearer • Robert Traeger • Principal Investigator: • Edwin Donnelly, M.D., • Ph.D. from Vanderbilt in Biomedical Engineering

  12. Facilities • W.M. Keck Free Electron Laser Center at Vanderbilt • Vanderbilt BME Department

  13. Resources • Monochromatic X-ray source at FEL • LabVIEW and Virtual Instruments • Stages, controllers, etc… for design construction provided by FEL & outside contractors

  14. Design Schematic -Detector has z-stage movement (1m) -Object has x (6cm), y (5cm), rotational (360 degrees) movement

  15. Components

  16. Selected Components Microcontroller Linear Translation Stage (z)

  17. Questions?

More Related