1 / 45

Development of Cast Modular Connections for Seismic-Resistant Steel Frames

Development of Cast Modular Connections for Seismic-Resistant Steel Frames. by. Robert B. Fleischman. Ali Sumer, Xuejun Li, Nathan Palmer, Ian Cameron. Department of Civil Engineering & Engineering Mechanics University of Arizona. Industry Partners. Varicast, Inc., Portland OR.

rgilmore
Télécharger la présentation

Development of Cast Modular Connections for Seismic-Resistant Steel Frames

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Development of Cast Modular Connections for Seismic-Resistant Steel Frames by Robert B. Fleischman Ali Sumer, Xuejun Li, Nathan Palmer, Ian Cameron Department of Civil Engineering & Engineering Mechanics University of Arizona

  2. Industry Partners • Varicast, Inc., Portland OR • Able Steel Fabricator Inc., Mesa AZ

  3. Cast Modular Connections for SMFs MODULAR NODE MODULAR CONNECTOR

  4. The Structural System: Steel Special Moment Frame (SMF) • Required in high seismic zones • Popular because of architectural advantages and ease of construction • Widely viewed as most reliable and ductile seismic lateral system • Lateral load resistance provided by rigid frame action using welded connections

  5. Story Drift Load Region of high moment requires rigid connection h L Background:Frame Action

  6. Background: Seismic-Resistant Design FORCE recoverable elastic F F service EQ X DRIFT non-recoverable • Cannot outstrength earthquake (economic/reliability standpoint) • Create special regions (details) that act as structural “fuses”, limiting the forces (usually through yielding of steel) • Yielding dissipates the earthquake energy • “Stretch but not break”

  7. Plastic Rotation absorbs & dissipates EQ energy Panel Zone Shear due to Beam Moments Plastic Shear Distortion dissipates EQ energy. Beam End Moments due to Lateral Load Beam Plastic Hinge Area Energy Dissipation Mechanism for SMFs

  8. Northridge Earthquake, January 17, 1994 • More than 100 Special Moment Frames (SMFs) suffered extensive brittle fracture (no yielding)

  9. Main factors causing connection failure • Weld and HAZ possess low toughness • Flanges at weld attract high shear force • High triaxial restraint at column flange/beam flange interface • Column flange stress transferred in through-thickness direction • In other words, these connection’s inherent configuration is not conducive to ductile behavior, and to make matters worse, the weld region is placed at this location.

  10. NSF CAREER Award 01-96120 Proposed Solution • Specially configure the connection region for optimal seismic performance. • Eliminate the field weld from the critical region. Traditional rolled shapes do not have the versatility in form to meet this objective. It is, however, a natural application for steel castings.

  11. Modular Node Concept: Fabrication and Erection Column Shop Weld Field Weld Beam Beam PZ-MN Field Weld Shop Weld Column

  12. 80 70 60 50 True Stress (ksi) 50 ksi steel 40 43 ksi steel 30 True Stress 20 True Strain 10 0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 True Strain Material Requirements Nominal Requirement As provided by Varicast

  13. Research Program Analytical Experimental

  14. Cast Modular Connections for SMFs

  15. Field Weld Panel zone weak relative to beam Field Weld PZ-MN Configuration Web connecting detail

  16. Deformation of Panel Zone: Traditional Joint Kinking of Column Flange P

  17. Column Flange Kinking in Connection FEMA 350 minimum PZ relative strength Implied allowable column flange curvature value Weaker panel zone relative to beam

  18. R Filleted cruciform PZ-MN Configuration Web connecting detail

  19. Reducing Column Flange Curvature Allowable Curvature

  20. Reduced column section Reduced link section PZ-MN Configuration Link region No web in beam link Web connecting detail

  21. High Strain in PZ-MN, Early Version

  22. Proposed Full Joint Mechanism

  23. Flange stiffener Web connector PZ-MN Configuration Web connecting detail

  24. Mitigation of Weld Stress Web Connector

  25. PZ-MN Prototype

  26. Experiment Subassemblage

  27. PZ-MN-01 Monotonic Test Py (EXP) = 70 Py (FE) =76

  28. Developing Full Joint Mechanism

  29. PZ-MN-02 FEMA Cyclic Test Survived 12 additional cycles at max amplitude Qualifying Drift Angle for Strength Degradation Qualifying Drift Angle: Complete Failure

  30. Modular Connector (MC) • Objective – Dissipate EQ energy in the connector rather than in main members. • Shop-weld or bolt to beam • Field bolt to column

  31. Partially-Restrained Frames (PRFs) Bolted connections are typically less stiff and strong than welded connections, and thus are used throughout the structure.

  32. D T M C M=Tdbm To evaluate the overall connection while examining only single connector in tension: =D/ dbm Simplified Model of Mechanics dbm

  33. Bolt Prying of Traditional Tee-Stub Plastic Hinge Locations T=Q+P

  34. ALPHA PROTOTYPE In comparison to traditional connection: • Similar stiffness and strength • Reduced bolt prying • No bolt failure • Improved ductility

  35. Comparison of Plastic Damage Regions: Connector vs. Traditional Connection

  36. Beta Prototype Features: • Variable arm width instead of thickness. • Design based on improved analytical model. • Quality control and high value steel in castings.

  37. Effect of Arm Shape failure strain ADAS WT WT MC 3 2.5 MC 2 1.5 ADAS 1 0.5 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 WT Translating Boundary MC ADAS Fixed Boundary EQUIVALENT PLASTIC STRAIN Isometric View

  38. CAD Drawings of MC Half-scale Prototypes

  39. MC Half-scale Prototype Castings Specimen prepared with pull plate and strain gages MC with Base MC without Base

  40. Global Results: MC vs. WT DUCTILE FAILURE IN MC MC 7/8" A325 Bolt BOLT FAILURE

  41. Strain Distribution Along Arm

  42. Comparison of Constant Amplitude Tests Cycles to failure:19 WT 0.72 0.00 Cycles to failure:44 Amplitude (inch) MC 0.72 0.00 Loading History

  43. MC without Base MC – No Base WT

  44. Conclusions Steel castings have shown great promise as special energy-dissipating details in steel moment frames in high seismic zones. These modular designs exhibited: • Superior ductility w.r.t. traditional connections • Stable and efficient energy dissipation • Increasing strength due to work hardening • Reliability and repeatability

  45. Future Work The NSF CAREER Award Grant extends until May 2003. The UA research team plans to continue work in this area until 2005. This work will include: • Qualification testing of family of PZ-MN • Full-scale testing of MC • Development and full-scale testing of PH-MN • Extension of MC concept to PT Systems

More Related