1 / 7

Daniela Luzi, CNR-IRPPS

WORKSHOP ON CRIS, CERIF AND INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES Maximising the Benefit of Research Information for Researchers, Research Managers, Entrepreneurs and the Public 10 May 2010 - 11 May 2010. Daniela Luzi, CNR-IRPPS. Common framework. Open access to scientific outputs

rhian
Télécharger la présentation

Daniela Luzi, CNR-IRPPS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WORKSHOP ON CRIS, CERIF AND INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIESMaximising the Benefit of Research Information for Researchers, Research Managers, Entrepreneurs and the Public10 May 2010 - 11 May 2010 Daniela Luzi, CNR-IRPPS

  2. Common framework • Open access to scientific outputs • Scholarly communication as a non-linear process encompassing formal and informal activities related to the use and dissemination of information • Scientific products as artefacts increasing in number, types and formats • Scientific information infrastructure as people, technology, tools and services used to facilitate the distributed, collaborative use of content over time and distance

  3. Open access • Principles of free knowledge circulation put on political agendas at local, national and international level • Direct commitments for curation, access and long-term preservation • All types of scientific outputs, including data • Redefinition of models in the dissemination of scientific information • Reshaping of roles and functions of stakeholders • New and/or reinforced collaboration framework to make OA feasible

  4. Scholarly communication • Discipline-dependent • research practice and methods • staff composition and extension (number of researchers, geographical location, types of projects, etc…) • scientific outcomes • communication and publishing behaviours • evaluation metrics • Capture the research life-cycle, from project proposal to final results • Identify research outputs for each phase of the life-cycle • Identify links among the different outputs • Select the outputs to disseminate and choose the best way to do it

  5. Scientific products • Ever growing variety from “traditional publications and GL documents” to digital-born objects, datasets, software, … • Importance of linking products with • their description, content, component parts, • processing, methods used and visualization (especially for datasets), • other products, • context of in which they are produced Each component is an entry point to the set of related products

  6. Information infrastructure • Integration of • Internal and external resources, • Heterogeneous contents and formats, • Different knowledge representation • Policy and practices in managing information • Deposit once (locally, disciplinary, ….) • redirect to any other appropriate repository, or • link to the appropriate source Retrieve distributed information from different information sources Navigate through links to capture different digital objects and contents Re-use information/data

  7. … and we will find out more common points of view … and hopefully different perspectives

More Related