1 / 17

Sanctuary Focus Group

Sanctuary Focus Group. Year 1 - Progress. http://www.ashanet.org/focusgroups/sanctuary Asha-sanctuary@yahoogroups.com. Hansa Shah, Princeton (hansa@go2g2.com) Venkata Pingali, LA/USC (pingali@isi.edu) Rohini Muthuswami, Delhi (rmuthuswami@yahoo.com)

rinah-england
Télécharger la présentation

Sanctuary Focus Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sanctuary Focus Group Year 1 - Progress http://www.ashanet.org/focusgroups/sanctuary Asha-sanctuary@yahoogroups.com Hansa Shah, Princeton (hansa@go2g2.com) Venkata Pingali, LA/USC (pingali@isi.edu) Rohini Muthuswami, Delhi (rmuthuswami@yahoo.com) Sunil Laxman, Seattle (linuslax@yahoo.com) And many others….

  2. Focus on What? • Children of women in prostitution and child victims of trafficking and prostitution • Danger of being Trafficked and exploited – rights violation • Lack of education opportunities, further trapping them in the vicious cycle • Lack of real options • Religious and societal sanction to exploitation

  3. Why Sanctuary? • Children • Role of education • Creating alternative options • Socializing the issue • Lack of attention

  4. Efforts • Focus: NGO Networking • Objectives • Improve communication • Conference (Dec 2003), Workshops (in progress) • Quarterly Newsletter (in progress, June 2004) • Bring diverse parties together • Current partners & Child-Rights Groups • Current partners & educators • Current partners & womens’ rights groups

  5. Sanctuary Conference – Dec 2003 • Hosted by Odanadi, Mysore • 26 Groups, 10 states • 3 Days, Budget: $2100

  6. Some more… • Combination of presentations, panels and discussions • More information: http://www.ashanet.org/focusgroups/sanctuary/conf/

  7. Key Outcomes • Groups saw the need to network • Preference for non-funding based network • Groups would like a communication channel • To share experiences • Newsletter – preferably in hard copy • Bilateral relationships forged

  8. Follow Up • Reports • Minutes (Sanctuary Website) • Articles: Patrika and Asha Annual Report • Newsletter • First issue: June 2004 • Editors: Rohini, Delhi and Sunil, Seattle • Workshop • 2-3 In planning stage • Focus being determined

  9. Others • Exploring collaborations • Asha-Mgmt (To build organizational strengths) • Asha-AAPI (Health issues, peripheral) • AID, IFA (Coordinated efforts) • Collecting statistics • Build focus group understanding of issues

  10. Sanctuary Focus Group Assessment http://www.ashanet.org/focusgroups/sanctuary Asha-sanctuary@yahoogroups.com

  11. Our Take • Deep rooted problem • Need to engage people and institutions • Need for sustained effort • Support build bottom up • NGOs vary in effectiveness • Philosophical differences • Broad coalition needed not formed • Several past networks have failed • Sometimes goal too far into future • Value vs overhead • One size fits all

  12. Current Situation • NGOs • Highly motivated • Limited impact (geographical, depth, range) • Philosophical differences • Existing Networks • ASTEC, NACSET, NATSAP, Informal • None focusing on children of victims of trafficking! • Government • (Weak) Legislation and (Poor) Enforcement • (Poorly implemented) Schemes

  13. Existing Networks vs Sanctuary • Existing Networks • Oriented towards advocacy • Focused on trafficking related issues • Sanctuary • Not a formal network – free to evolve • Oriented towards creating options that give meaning to legal freedom • Focused on the next generation, and younger victims of trafficking

  14. Facilitating NGO Interaction • Provide neutral platform for diverse groups • In person (conference) and virtual (emails, newsletters) • Build bridges between diverse groups (address fragmentation) • Free to Evolve • Network “emerges” rather than be “defined” • Common action items “emerge” than be “defined” • Areas of cooperation “emerge” than be “define”

  15. Near Term Goals: Capacity Building • Focus: young and start-up NGOs • Research vocation options and facilitate workshops as needed • Why? • Fairly local activity • Encourages multiple parallel, small networks with loose coordination • NGOs participate out of self-interest

  16. Asha Focus Groups • Cross-group coordination needed • Use as resources for chapters • Provide guidance in projects

  17. Questions? http://www.ashanet.org/focusgroups/sanctuary asha-sanctuary@yahoogroups.com Hansa Shah, Princeton (hansa@go2g2.com) Venkata Pingali, LA/USC (pingali@isi.edu) Rohini Muthuswami, Delhi (rmuthuswami@yahoo.com) Sunil Laxman, Seattle (linuslax@yahoo.com) And many others….

More Related