1 / 13

Global Federated Network Operations Structure (GFNOS)

GFNOS seeks to enhance communication among NOCs globally to address end-to-end network infrastructure queries from researchers. Proposed improvements include video communications, trouble ticket interchange, E2E measurement capabilities, and integrated security services.

rittere
Télécharger la présentation

Global Federated Network Operations Structure (GFNOS)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Global Federated Network Operations Structure (GFNOS) Jim Williams TransPAC2 Principal Investigator williams@indiana.edu

  2. E-science NOCs • Must be prepared to answer end-to-end network infrastructure questions from researchers • To answer these questions, NOCs must communicate among themselves

  3. An example • A researcher in Beijing wants to connect computational resources in China to a data store located in France. But, there seems to be a connectivity problem somewhere along the way… • Regardless of the location of the problem…the researcher in Beijing will want to talk to the Beijing NOC…and will EXPECT an answer • “The problem is not in the China network” is NOT an acceptable response.

  4. NOC-NOC Communications • How can we facilitate the NOC-to-NOC interaction required to provide this service? • I propose several communications mechanisms • Better video communications • Improved Trouble Ticket interchange • Enhanced E2E measurement capabilities • More closely integrated security services

  5. Better video communications • I propose a NOC--NOC video link based on a private “spin-off” development of the access grid technology. This will enable a always-on video connection among all participating NOCs. • See the following web site: www.insors.com

  6. Access Grid can be built for groups…

  7. …or Personal Use

  8. Improved Trouble Ticket Interchange • Today the APAN NOC and engineering staff can access GRNOC TTs via the GRNOC FootPrints TT system. • Today the iGOC at IU and the USCMS Support Center at FermiLab have an elementary, e-mail based TT update/exchange operational. • We need a better, lightweight TT interchange or viewing process.

  9. Enhanced E2E Measurement Capabilities • Interoperability of NOC-to-NOC measurement tools and procedures are crucial to the success of the GFNOS. • Efforts are underway to coordinate measurement activities on a global scale. • Matthew Zekauskas (matt@internet2.edu) of Internet2 and Matt Mathis (mathis@psc.edu) of PSC are working to implement a global measurement environment for the NSF funded IRNC projects • John Hicks from IU and Takatoshi Ikeda from the KDDI APAN NOC have been cooperating on development of measurement codes including bwclt, owamp, and netflow flow-tools. These projects are designed to develop common procedures and metrics in order to qualitatively compare measurement data. • More education and outreach is needed. TransPAC2, APAN and Internet2 are planning to offer a Network Performance Workshop at the 21st APAN meeting in Tokyo.

  10. More closely integrated security services • Effort to develop more uniform policies • Baseline level of collected information in similar formats • Develop trust relationships in order to securely exchange information. • PGP encryption of NOC-NOC communications • List of trusted security contacts (I have an example) • Develop global view of security incidents to effectively coordinate actions and reduce response time.

  11. An Umbrella Organizationto Facilitate this Interaction • Global [international] • Federated [no hierarchy] • Network Operations [business focus] • Structure [not an organization] Global Federated Network Operations Structure (GFNOS)

  12. Feedback… • Is the GFNOS needed? • How can we move forward? • IU/NSF is willing to host an exploratory meeting at the GRNOC in Indianapolis. • Another alternative would be preceding (or following) the APAN meeting in Tokyo. • Is there an opportunity to test some measurement and video tools at the iGRID2005 and SC2005 demonstrations?

  13. Questions?? Jim Williams TransPAC2 Principal Investigator williams@indiana.edu http://www.transpac2.net

More Related