200 likes | 289 Vues
The Sensors workgroup focuses on real-time data collection and denser time-series data using technology as surrogates for costly analyses. Collaborating with various organizations across different regions, the group aims to improve data comparability and quality assurance in monitoring programs. By leveraging expertise and resources, they develop guidance matrices, site selection guides, and glossaries to standardize field monitoring practices.
E N D
Sensors-related Activities of the Methods Board Methods and Data Comparability Board
Why? • Real-time data • Denser time-series data • Technology • Surrogates for costly, time-intensive analyses
Mystic River Watershed Association (MA) Whistler Valley (BC, CA) Texas CEQ Long Island Sound San Francisco Bay Deerfield River (MA) Hempstead Harbor (NY) Indiana DEQ Interstate Env. Comm. (NY) Bermuda Atlantic NOAA Martha’s Vineyard Lake St. Clair (MI, CA) Neuse River Estuary (NC) USEPA GLNPO VENUS UConn Marine Service USGS Milwaukee Met Sewage Who?
What? * (as of 2.6.09 @ 0930)
Sensors workgroup • Members from monitoring community, research, and industry • White paper • Task divided into: • Collection of high-quality data • Management of effective monitoring program
Sensors workgroup • QA/QC • Technology • Field Applications • Data Management
Field Monitoring Quality Assurance Initiative • Comprised of core working group and a review board • Core group is 9 people from industry (6); government (2); and a consultant, along w/ Methods Board and Council ad-hoc members (3). • Review board of 15: 11 from gov’t; 1 from industry; and 2 from academia
Products • Guidance Matrix • Site selection and deployment guide • List of minimum required data elements • Glossary of Terms
Technology subgroup • Leverage existing resources • Recommend technologies suitable for the Network
Methods Board Part Three • National Environmental Methods Index • NEMI, http://www.nemi.gov/ • Since 2002
Love grows http://www.nemi.gov/