1 / 24

HISTORY-TAKING: ABSOLUTELY PARAMOUNT!!

Clinical Examination Paul Thawley BSC ( Hons ) MSc (Sports Medicine) Pg Dip (Rehabilitation) Clinical teaching fellow UCL. HISTORY-TAKING: ABSOLUTELY PARAMOUNT!! As in all areas of medicine, a comprehensive history is the vital first step to correct diagnosis of an injury.

rlim
Télécharger la présentation

HISTORY-TAKING: ABSOLUTELY PARAMOUNT!!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Clinical Examination Paul ThawleyBSC (Hons) MSc (Sports Medicine) Pg Dip (Rehabilitation)Clinical teaching fellow UCL

  2. HISTORY-TAKING: ABSOLUTELY PARAMOUNT!! As in all areas of medicine, a comprehensive history is the vital first step to correct diagnosis of an injury. Many sport-related injuries are complex in nature and the treating practitioner will need the skills to obtain as much information as possible. Description of current symptoms- pain (site, nature, severity, irritability, referral, associated symptoms), stiffness, mechanical symptoms (locking, giving way, weakness, crepitus or clicking), neurological symptoms. Aggravating and relieving factors. Level of sport played. Personal “goals” of the subject. Description of onset of symptoms – acute or insidious. What was the exact mechanism of injury? (as much detail as possible) Was the onset trauma-related?

  3. Was the injured subject able to continue exercising or play on? If lower limb, could the subject weight bear? – if not, for how long? Were there any associated symptoms? e.g. numbness, “pins and needles” Did the injured area swell? – If yes, was the swelling immediate or delayed and, if so, for how long? What was the playing surface? What equipment or footwear was being used? Past history of injury details. Exclude “red flags” Check for relevant family history Training regimen - document any alterations in type, surfaces used, intensity or volume. Details of any treatment received and from whom?

  4. Hypo-deductive reasoning model All Joint examinations require clinical reasoning and a methodical approach (Higgs and Jones 2000, Edwards et al 2004).

  5. Order of examination Gait and Biomechanics Move Feel Special tests (Functional and Clinical) Neurological and Vascular (if applicable)

  6. The Knee Joint But could be any Joint complex the approach remains unchanged !

  7. LOOK General shape swelling, deformities, muscle mass and atrophy, bruising, haematoma.

  8. Lower limb alignment: Foot and ankle, knee, pelvis, hip, visual leg length discrepancy, shoe wear etc.

  9. Gait and Biomechanocs Gait cycle: walking, running, Varying phases. Video good tool

  10. Functional movements: Anterior / posterior kinetic chain control, pelvic stability, is tested in functional testing at the end of your examination. Use common sense

  11. Sports Specificity: Test aggravating factors movements specific to the athletes sport. Use Common sense

  12. Range of motion Active range of motion: flexion/extension/internal rotation/external rotation. Passive range of motion: flexion/extension/internal rotation/external rotation + overpressure can be added to all of these ranges to elicit clinical signs. Terminal flexion / extension control (?WB) Closed packed to 10 degrees flexion + - rotation (?WB)

  13. FEEL Effusion / Heat Deformity Joint margins Land marks Bursae Ligaments MM insertions / origins Etc

  14. Joint complex specific Special tests Many tests cited in research, have poor validity, repeatability and fail to target the claimed specific structures.

  15. Patella effusion sweep test patella tap Test

  16. Collateral ligaments Medial collateral ligament: valgus stress test + palpation lateral collateral ligament varus stress test + palpation

  17. Meniscus palpation McMurray's test; Medial: External rotation/valgus stress into flexion. Lateral: Internal rotation/varus stress into flexion

  18. Thessaly test (20degrees flexion fixed foot rotation)

  19. Anterior cruciate ligament Lachman`s test Anterior draw test Pivot shift test

  20. Posterior collateral ligament SAG test/sign posterior draw test

  21. Patello-femoral joint patella tracking test/sign patella apprehension test Clarke`s test/sign

  22. iliotibial band noble`s test Ober`s test

  23. References Teresa L. Et al (2010) Clinical Evaluation of the Knee. NewEngland Journal of Medicine; 363:e5J TR Madhusudhanet al(2008) Clinical examination, MRI and arthroscopy in meniscal and ligamentous knee Injuries – a prospective study.Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2008, 3:19 Theofilos et al (2005) Diagnostic Accuracy of a New Clinical Test (the Thessaly Test) for Early Detection of Meniscal Tears The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:955-962. Gerard A. Malanga, et al (2003) Physical examination of the knee: A review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopaedic tests. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages 592-603. Ostrowski JA. (2006). Accuracy of 3 diagnostic tests for anterior cruciate ligament tears Journal of athletic training Jan-Mar;41(1):120-1

More Related