1 / 27

(OO) Integration Testing

(OO) Integration Testing. Informally - a (design) point of view. What: Integration testing is a phase of software testing in which individual software modules are combined and tested as a group. It follows unit testing and precedes system testing.

roblesc
Télécharger la présentation

(OO) Integration Testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. (OO) Integration Testing Informally - a (design) point of view What: Integration testingis a phase of software testing in which individual software modules are combined and tested as a group. It follows unit testing and precedes system testing. Why:The purpose of integration testing is to verify functional, performance and reliability requirements placed on major design artefacts. How: integration testing is a logical extension of unit testing. In its simplest form, two units that have already been tested are combined into a component and the interface between them is tested. But choosing the integration order is non-trivial! INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  2. (OO) Integration vs RegressionTesting – another (incremental development) point of view Integration tests are performed when new code is added to an existing code base; for example, when a new function is added to a set of existing functions. Integration tests measure whether the new code works -- integrates -- with the existing code; these tests look for data input and output, correct handling of variables, etc. Regression testing is the counterpart of integration testing: when new code is added to existing code, regression testing verifies that the existing code continues to work correctly, whereas integration testing verifies that the new code works as expected. Regression testing can describes the process of testing new code to verify that this new code hasn't broken any old code. Question: is this incremental view a good way of thinking about integration testing or is the designview better? INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  3. Integration Testing: What about OO? • The components to be tested are object classes that are instantiated as objects • Larger grain than individual functions so approaches to white-box testing have to be extended • No obvious ‘top’ to the system for top-down integration and testing • Levels of integration are less distinct in object-oriented systems • Cluster testing is concerned with integrating and testing clusters of cooperating objects • Identify clusters using knowledge of the operation of objects and the system features that are implemented by these clusters INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  4. Integration Testing: What Clusters? • Use-case or scenario testing • Testing is based on a user interactions with the system • Has the advantage that it tests system features as experienced by users • Thread testing • Tests the systems response to events as processing threads through the system • Object interaction testing • Tests sequences of object interactions that stop when an object operation does not call on services from another object INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  5. (OO) Integration Testing Tests complete systems or subsystems composed of integrated components Integration testing should be black-box testing with tests derived from the specification Main difficulty is localising errors Incremental integration testing reduces this problem INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  6. Integration of components • Component testing • Testing of individual program components • Usually the responsibility of the component developer (except sometimes for critical systems) • Tests are derived from the developer’s experience • Integration testing • Testing of groups of components integrated to create a system or sub-system • The responsibility of an independent testing team • Tests are based on a system specification INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  7. Integration of components INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  8. Integration of components: test process is the same INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  9. Integration Testing Strategy • The entire system is viewed as a collection of subsystems (sets of classes) determined during the system and object design. • The order in which the subsystems are selected for testing and integration determines the testing strategy • Big bang integration (Nonincremental) • Bottom up integration • Top down integration • Sandwich testing • Variations of the above • For the selection use the system decomposition from the System Design INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  10. A Layer I D C B Layer II G F E Layer III Example Design Structure: Three Layer Call Hierarchy INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  11. System Test Integration Testing: Big-Bang Approach Unit Test A Not recommended in all but the simplest systems! Unit Test B Unit Test C Unit Test D Unit Test E Unit Test F INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  12. Bottom-up Testing Strategy • The subsystem in the lowest layer of the call hierarchy are tested individually • Then the next subsystems are tested that call the previously tested subsystems • This is done repeatedly until all subsystems are included in the testing • Special program needed to do the testing, Test Driver: • A routine that calls a subsystem and passes a test case to it INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  13. A Layer I D C B Layer II G F E Layer III Test B, E, F Test A, B, C, D, E, F, G Test D,G Bottom-up Integration Unit Test E Require Driver: B Unit Test F Unit Test C Requires Driver: A Unit Test G Requires Driver: G INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  14. Advantages and Disadvantages of bottom-up integration testing • Bad for functionally decomposed systems: • Tests the most important subsystem (UI) last • Useful for integrating the following systems • Object-oriented systems • real-time systems • systems with strict performance requirements INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  15. Top-down Testing Strategy • Test the top layer or the controlling subsystem first • Then combine all the subsystems that are called by the tested subsystems and test the resulting collection of subsystems • Do this until all subsystems are incorporated into the test • Special program is needed to do the testing, Test stub : • A program or a method that simulates the activity of a missing subsystem by answering to the calling sequence of the calling subsystem and returning back fake data. INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  16. A Layer I D C B Layer II G F E Layer III Test A, B, C, D, E, F, G Test A, B, C, D Layer I + II All Layers Top-down Integration Testing Test A Layer I Requires stubs: B C D E F G INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  17. Advantages and Disadvantages of top-down integration testing • Test cases can be defined in terms of the functionality of the system (functional requirements) • Writing stubs can be difficult: Stubs must allow all possible conditions to be tested. • Possibly a very large number of stubs may be required, especially if the lowest level of the system contains many methods. • One solution to avoid too many stubs: Modified top-down testing strategy • Test each layer of the system decomposition individually before merging the layers • Disadvantage of modified top-down testing: Both, stubs and drivers are needed INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  18. Sandwich Testing Strategy • Combines top-down strategy with bottom-up strategy • The system is view as having three layers • A target layer ‘somewhere in the middle’ • A layer above the target • A layer below the target • Testing converges at the target layer • How do you select the target layer if there are more than 3 layers? • Heuristic: Try to minimize the number of stubs and drivers INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  19. A Layer I D C B Layer II G F E Layer III Test B, E, F Bottom Layer Tests Test F Test D,G Test G Test A Top Layer Tests Sandwich Testing Strategy Test E Test A, B, C, D, E, F, G Test A,B,C, D INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  20. Advantages and Disadvantages of Sandwich Testing • Top and Bottom Layer Tests can be done in parallel • Does not test the individual subsystems thoroughly before integration • Solution: modified sandwichtesting strategy: • Test in parallel: • Middle layer with drivers and stubs • Top layer with stubs • Bottom layer with drivers • Test in parallel: • Top layer accessing middle layer (top layer replaces drivers) • Bottom accessed by middle layer (bottom layer replaces stubs) INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  21. Double Test I A Test B Layer I D C B Layer II Test E Triple Test I G F E Layer III Triple Test I Test B, E, F Double Test II Test F Test A, B, C, D, E, F, G Test D Double Test II Test D,G Test G Test A,C Test A Test C Double Test I Modified Sandwich Testing Strategy INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  22. 1. Based on the integration strategy, select a component to be tested. Unit test all the classes in the component. 2. Put selected component together; do any preliminary fix-up necessary to make the integration test operational (drivers, stubs) 3. Do functional testing: Define test cases that exercise all uses cases with the selected component 4. Do structural testing: Define test cases that exercise the selected component 5. Execute performance tests 6. Keep records of the test cases and testing activities. 7. Repeat steps 1 to 7 until the full system is tested. The primary goal of integration testing is to identify errors in the (current) component configuration. Steps in Integration-Testing . INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  23. Factors to consider Amount of test harness (stubs &drivers) Location of critical parts in the system Availability of hardware Availability of components Scheduling concerns Bottom up approach good for object oriented design methodologies Test driver interfaces must match component interfaces ... ...Top-level components are usually important and cannot be neglected up to the end of testing Detection of design errors postponed until end of testing Top down approach Test cases can be defined in terms of functions examined Need to maintain correctness of test stubs Writing stubs can be difficult Choosing an Integration Strategy? INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  24. Remember the Testing Life Cycle Establish the test objectives Design the test cases Write the test cases Test the test cases Execute the tests Evaluate the test results Change the system Do regression testing INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  25. How to Construct a Good Test Team? Professional Tester too familiar Programmer with code Analyst System Designer Test User Team Configuration Management Specialist INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  26. In a complex system, you will probably need a test bench to co-ordinate testing activities INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

  27. (OO) Integration Testing Lets learn about integration testing by looking at a practical example: • Check out the Source Code at the web site • We will use the IntPairArray from the regression testing exercise: • IntPair.java, • Compare.java, • IntPairArray.java, • in our new system: Integration.java • It is your task to compare and contrast 2 different integration testing approaches (e.g. big bang vs bottom-up) for this System. INT-Evry (Masters IT– Soft Eng)

More Related