220 likes | 515 Vues
Models for Amino Acid Sequences. DNA (4 x 4 rate matrix) vs amino acid (20 x 20) resulting in many more parameters and thus, computation timeConsequently, amino acid models have concentrated on empirical approachesEMPIRICAL (several implemented in MrBayes; model = fixed )NON-EMPIRICAL (model
E N D
1. Models of Protein Evolution Amino acid sequences (20 amino acids)
Protein-coding DNA sequences
2. Models for Amino Acid Sequences DNA (4 x 4 rate matrix) vs amino acid (20 x 20) resulting in many more parameters and thus, computation time
Consequently, amino acid models have concentrated on empirical approaches
EMPIRICAL (several implemented in MrBayes; model = fixed )
NON-EMPIRICAL (model = “variable” in MrBayes)
3. Models for Amino Acid Sequences
EMPIRICAL (several implemented in MrBayes; model = fixed ) 20 x 20 matrices
Dayhoff et al. (1978) matrix based on the observation of 1572 accepted mutations between 34 superfamilies of closely related sequences
JTT matrix (Jones et al. 1992; Gonnett et al. 1992): same methodology as Dayhoff, but with modern databases (other later modifications for transmembrane Jones et al. 1994)
mtREV (Adachi and Hasegawa 1995, 1996) matrix derived from maximum likelihood-inferred replacements in mitochondrial proteins of 20 vertebrate species
WAG (Whelan and Goldman 2001) matrix derived from maximum likelihood improvement of JTT
Poisson assumes equal stationary state frequencies and equal substitution rates (equivalent to JC model for DNA). Not really empirical, but it is fixed
4. Dayhoff Evolutionary Mutation Matrix