1 / 27

Fall Risk Reduction Program Patient Assessment Module #2 of 6

Fall Risk Reduction Program Patient Assessment Module #2 of 6. Shelley Thomas, MPT, MBA Dara Coburn, M.S., CCC-SLP. AGENDA. Patient assessment Choosing the most appropriate assessment protocol Choosing the top systems of balance impacting falls Q & A. Patient Selection.

rocio
Télécharger la présentation

Fall Risk Reduction Program Patient Assessment Module #2 of 6

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fall Risk Reduction Program Patient Assessment Module #2 of 6 Shelley Thomas, MPT, MBA Dara Coburn, M.S., CCC-SLP

  2. AGENDA • Patient assessment • Choosing the most appropriate assessment protocol • Choosing the top systems of balance impacting falls • Q & A

  3. Patient Selection • Patient and family goals and expectations • History of falling? Fear of falling? • Weight bearing status • Able to weight bear as tolerated? Or partial weight bearing? • Cognitive and communicative status • Attend to task for at least 60 seconds to 2 minutes? • Able to communicate basic wants and needs? • Follow simple directions? • Inpatient vs. outpatient • Intensity of treatment

  4. Patient Selection • Discharge Disposition • Home with help? • Home alone? • Ongoing treatment? • Concomitant diagnosis • Tolerance to exercise? • Medications? • Vision and Hearing Status • Does the patient have adaptive equipment? • Is the equipment available for their use?

  5. Patient Selection, cont. Candidates for this program should have goals that include ambulation and/or lower extremity weight bearing transfers • Standing pivot/squat pivot transfers • Modified depression transfers • Ambulation with or without a device Patients that are dependent with transfers or unable to walk or have severe to profound cognitive and/or communication deficits • May require therapy for other reasons, but focus is less likely on decreasing falls. Often focus is on caregiver training, wheelchair mobility, compensatory strategies etc.

  6. Long Term Goals

  7. Long Term Goals

  8. Short Term Goals • Patient will perform both toes for 2 minutes with while holding onto walker for balance and achieve <200 ms task average with difficulty level set at 300, tempo set at 54 bpm, and guide sounds on. • Patient will attend to task during a synchronized cognitive/motor activity for 2 minutes with moderate cues and/or redirection, achieving a temporal processing score within 150 ms of the reference beat in order to persist in daily activities and complete them without constant prompting

  9. Documentation Documentation should include: • IMtask to be completed • Task average to be achieved • IM settings (i.e. tempo, if guide sounds are on/off, difficulty level, etc.) • Assistance to be provided (i.e. verbal cues, hands on cues, modeling, etc.) • Relationship to functional outcome

  10. Narrative Note Example Soap Note Example: • S – Patient seen for skilled speech therapy. He was alert and oriented. He participated well in treatment and had no complaints of pain. • O – Patient will follow a 2-step direction • A – Performed a cognitive/motor task direction in the presence of auditory cues and repetitive task practice with hand over hand assistance. Required more assistance from clinician as complexity of auditory cue and feedback was added. Has difficulty in distraction. Required moderate assistance to persist. • P – Increase complexity of feedback, reduce amount of clinical assistance require. Alternate between two different sets of directions as tolerated.

  11. Determining Patient Baseline Use both IM assessments and standardized evaluation tools to determine baseline prior to starting Fall Risk Reduction Program

  12. IM Assessments • Short Form Test (SFT) • Patient performs two 1-minutes task • One without guide sounds, the other with guide sounds • Provides baseline task average for ability to pair auditory information with motor sequencing task • Long Form Assessment (LFA) • 14 tasks, evaluates coordination and sequencing with different motor tasks • Takes approximately 20-25 minutes to administer • Modify to meet the patient’s current level • Document any modifications provided • Should administer one of these assessments when evaluating patient

  13. Standardized Assessments • Multitude of standardized assessments that can be used to assess fall risk, ability to perform activitiesof daily living, cognitive status • Important to assess dual-tasking impact on balance • It's good a person can walk. But can they walk and talk? Walk and carry a glass of water? Be safe when distracted?

  14. Motor Assessments • Motor/Balance Assessment: • TUG • Tinetti Scale • Functional Reach • Dynamic Gait Index • 6-Minute Walk Test

  15. Cognitive Assessments • RIPA • SCATBI • Test of Variables of Attention • Stroop Affect • Trail Making • Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning Scale (D-KEFS) • Mesulam and Weintraub Cancellation Test (MWCT) • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) • Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) • Woodcock- Johnson, 3rd Edition (WCJ-III)

  16. Confidence Assessments • Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale • Modified Falls Efficacy Scale Including a confidence assessment helps determine if the patient has less concerns about falling and is perceiving improvements in physical abilities.

  17. Other Useful Tools and Assessments • Functional Assessment Tool (Developed by Amy Vega) • Stroke Impact Scale • Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

  18. Timed Up & Go Modification to Assess Dual Tasking • Can modify the TUG to incorporate a cognitive and physical task • Administer TUG under following conditions: • Traditional conditions • While carrying a glass of water • While counting backwards from 100 in serial 7's

  19. Normative Values Shumway-Cook, A., Brauer, S., & Woollacott, M. (2000, September). Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the timed up & go test. Physical Therapy , 80(9), 896-903.

  20. Create a Dual Task Condition with Short Form Test Compare traditional SFT score with a dual-task condition (document how you create dual-task so it can be replicated). Perform SFT while: • Counting aloud • Marching in place • Transfering sit to/from stand • Walking (use in-motion triggers) • Naming objects

  21. Summary of Patient Selection & Assessment • Patient should have goals that include ambulation and/or transfers (that involve lower extremity weight bearing) • Use standardized assessment tools to evaluation motor and cognitive performance • Use IM assessments to get a baseline on ability to pair auditory information with motor sequencing. • Assess performance under dual-task conditions

  22. "Homework" • Complete following worksheet to select and assess your patient

  23. Post-test • Complete post-test to receive link for Module # 3 of 6

  24. Materials Page • This video • PowerPoint • Patient Selection Worksheet • www.interactivemetronome.com/index.php/fall-risk-coaching

  25. QUESTIONS?You can call or email us.We’re here to help! Call 877-994-6776: • Opt. 3 – Education • imcourses@interactivemetronome.com • Opt. 5 – Technical Support • support@interactivemetronome.com • Opt. 6 – Clinical Support • clinicaled@interactivemetronome.com • Opt. 7 – Marketing • newsletter@interactivemetronome.com ?

More Related