1 / 41

Discussion #8 EE450, 10/13/2010

Discussion #8 EE450, 10/13/2010. Sample Problems: -ARQ protocols (Sliding window). Draw a timeline diagram for the sliding window algorithm with SWS=RWS=4 frames for two given scenarios using the following assumptions:

rockwell-kolby
Télécharger la présentation

Discussion #8 EE450, 10/13/2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Discussion #8EE450, 10/13/2010 Sample Problems: -ARQ protocols (Sliding window)

  2. Draw a timeline diagram for the sliding window algorithm with SWS=RWS=4 frames for two given scenarios using the following assumptions: The receiver sends a duplicate acknowledgement if it does not receive the expected frame. For example it sends dupack[2] when it expects to see frame[2] but receives frame[3] instead. The receiver sends a cumulative acknowledgement after it receives all the outstanding frames. For example it sends ACK[5] when it receives the lost frame[2] after it already received frame[3], frame[4] and frame[5]. The timeout interval is about 2RTT. Problem#1: Description

  3. Problem#1: Two Scenarios • Frame[2] is lost. Retransmission takes place upon timeout (as usual). • Frame[2] is lost. Retransmission takes place either upon receipt of the first dupack or upon timeout. Does this scheme reduce the transaction time? Note that some end-to-end protocols (e.g. variants of TCP) use a similar scheme for fast retransmission.

  4. Problem#1 Solution: Scenario (a) Receiver Sender Transmission time Frame[1] Frame[2] Frame[3] Ttrans + RTT Ack[1] Frame[4] Dupack[2] Frame[5] Dupack[2] Ttrans + RTT Dupack[2] Frame[2] Timeout=2RTT Ack[5] Frame[6] Ack[6] time time

  5. Problem#1 Solution: Scenario (b) Receiver Sender Transmission time Frame[1] Frame[2] Frame[3] Ttrans + RTT Ack[1] Frame[4] Dupack[2] Frame[5] Dupack[2] Frame[2] Dupack[2] Ttrans + RTT Ack[5] Frame[6] Ack[6] time time

  6. Comparing the two scenarios Transmission time Transmission time Frame[1] Frame[1] Ttrans Frame[2] Frame[2] 2Ttrans Frame[3] Frame[3] Ack[1] Frame[4] Ack[1] Frame[4] Dupack[2] Dupack[2] Frame[5] Frame[5] Timeout=2RTT Dupack[2] Dupack[2] Frame[2] 2Ttrans + 2RTT Dupack[2] Dupack[2] Frame[2] Ack[5] Ttrans + RTT Ack[5] Frame[6] Frame[6] Ack[6] Ack[6] (b) Delay2= 4Ttrans + 2RTT (a) Delay1= 2Ttrans + 3RTT

  7. Comparing the transaction time (transfer delay) in the two scenarios RTT=2Tprop Delay1= 2Ttrans + 3RTT= 2Ttrans + 6Tprop Delay2= 4Ttrans + 2RTT=4Ttrans + 4Tprop ? 2Ttrans + 6Tprop > 4Ttrans + 4Tprop ? 2Tprop > 2Ttrans If Tprop > Ttrans , in Scenario (b) the transaction time is reduced!

  8. Problem#2: Description • A is connected to B via an intermediate router R. • The A-R and R-B links each accept and transmit only one packet per second in each direction (so two packets take 2 seconds). • The two directions transmit independently. • A sends to B using the sliding window protocol with SWS=4.

  9. Problem#2: Questions? • For Time=0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 state what packets arrive at and leave each node, or label them on a timeline. 1 pkt/sec 1 pkt/sec A R B What happens if the links have a propagation delay of 1 seconds, but accept immediately as many packets as are offered (i.e. latency= 1 second but bandwidth is infinite). BW=∞ BW=∞ A R B Tprop=1 sec Tprop=1 sec

  10. Part (a) SolutionSWS=4 packets, RTT=4 sec Data[3] Data[2] Data[1] T=0 sec Data[0] A R B Data[3] Data[2] 0<T<1 sec Data[1] Data[0] A R B Data[3] Data[2] 1<T<2 sec Data[1] Data[0] A R B

  11. Part (a) Solution Ctd.Ignoring Ack Transmission Time At T=2 sec Data[0] arrives at B Data[0] Data[3] 2<T<3 sec Data[1] Data[2] A R B Ack[0] At T=3 sec Data[1] arrives at B Data[1] Data[3] Data[2] 3<T<4 sec A R B Ack[0] Ack[1] At T=4 sec Data[2] arrives at B Data[2] Data[4] Data[3] 4<T<5 sec A R B Ack[0] Ack[1] Ack[2] At T=5 sec Data[3] arrives at B, and Data[4] arrives at R

  12. Part (b) SolutionSWS=4 packets, infinite BW, RTT=4 sec Data[3] Data[2] Data[1] T=0 Data[0] A R B Data[3] Data[2] Data[1] Data[0] T=0+sec A R B Data[3] Data[2] Data[1] Data[0] T=1 sec A R B

  13. Part (b) Solution Ctd.Virtually No Transmission Time! Data[3] Data[2] Data[1] Data[0] T=1+ sec A R B Data[0] Data[1] Data[2] T=2 sec Data[3] A R B A R B T=2+ sec Ack[0] Ack[1] Ack[2] Ack[3]

  14. Part (b) Solution Ctd. A R B T=3 sec Ack[0] Ack[1] Ack[2] Ack[3] A R B T=3+ sec Ack[0] Ack[1] Ack[2] Ack[3] Data[7] Data[6] Data[5] Data[4] A R B T=4 sec Ack[0] Ack[1] Ack[2] Ack[3]

  15. Part (b) Solution Ctd. Data[7] Data[6] Data[5] Data[4] T=4+sec A R B Data[7] Data[6] Data[5] Data[4] T=5 sec A R B Data[7] Data[6] Data[5] Data[4] T=5+sec A R B

  16. Problem#3: Description • A is connected to B via an intermediate router R. • The A-R link is instantaneous but the R-B link transmit only one packet per second (so two packets take 2 seconds). • The two directions transmit independently. • A sends to B using the sliding window protocol with SWS=4.

  17. Problem#3 : Questions? Buffer • For Time=0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 state what packets arrive at and are sent from each node. • How large does the queue at R grow? BW=Infinity 1 pkt/sec A R B Tprop=0 sec

  18. Part (a) SolutionSWS=4 packets, RTT=2 sec Data[3] Data[2] Data[1] T=0 sec Data[0] A R B Data[3] Data[2] T=0+sec Data[1] Data[0] A R B Data[3] 0<T<1 sec Data[2] Data[0] Data[1] A R B

  19. Part (a) Solution Ctd.Ignoring Ack Transmission Time At T=1 sec Data[0] arrives at B Data[3] Data[0] 1<T<2 sec Data[1] Data[2] A R B Ack[0] Data[1] Data[2] Data[3] T=2 sec A R B Ack[1] Ack[0]

  20. Part (a) Solution Ctd. Data[1] Data[4] T=2+sec Data[2] Data[3] A R B Ack[0] Ack[1] At T=3 sec Data[2] arrives at B, and Ack[1] arrives at R Data[2] 3<T<4sec Data[3] Data[4] A R B Ack[1] Ack[2]

  21. Part (a) Solution Ctd. Data[2] Data[5] T=3+sec Data[3] Data[4] A R B Ack[1] Ack[2] At T=4 sec Data[3] arrives at B, and Ack[2] arrives at R Data[3] 4<T<5sec Data[4] Data[5] A R B Ack[2] Ack[3]

  22. Part (a) Solution Ctd. Data[3] Data[6] T=4+sec Data[4] Data[5] A R B Ack[2] Ack[3] At T=5 sec Data[4] arrives at B, and Ack[3] arrives at R Part (b) Solution The steady-state queue size at R is two Data Frames.

  23. Problem#4: Description • Consider the same topology and situation as in problem #2. • Assume that the router has a buffer size of 1, i.e. it can hold one packet (or frame) in to addition to the one it is sending (in each direction). • Assume that A has a timeout interval of 4 sec and SWS=4.

  24. Problem#4 : Questions? From Time=0, show what happens at each second until all four packets successfully arrive at B. Buffer size=1 BW=∞ 1 pkt/sec A R B Tprop=0 sec

  25. SolutionSWS=4 packets, RTT=2 sec Data[3] Data[2] Data[1] T=0 sec Data[0] A R B Dropped Data[3] Data[0] Data[2] T=0+sec Data[1] A R B 0<T<1 sec Data[0] Data[1] A R B

  26. Solution Ctd.Ignoring Ack Transmission Time Data[0] Data[1] A R B 1<T<2 sec Ack[0] Data[1] T=2 sec A R B Ack[0] Ack[1] Data[4] A R B T=2+sec Ack[0] Ack[1]

  27. Solution Ctd.Ignoring Ack Transmission Time Data[4] A R B T=3 sec Ack[1] Data[4] Data[5] Buffered at B. A R B T=3+sec Ack[1] B receives an out of order frame, it does not send an Ack. At T=4 Timeout for Data[2] and Data[3]. A starts retransmitting them. At T=4 sec Data[5] also arrives at B. Data[3] Data[4] Data[2] T=4 Data[5] A R B Buffered at B.

  28. Solution Ctd.Ignoring Ack Transmission Time Data[2] Data[4] Data[3] T=4+sec Data[5] A R B Buffered at B. At T=4+sec, R has started transmitting Data[2] while Data[3] is enqueued. Data[4] Data[3] Data[2] A R B Data[5] 4<T<5 sec Buffered at B.

  29. Solution Ctd. Data[3] Data[2] Data[4] Data[5] A R B T=5+sec Buffered at B. Data[4] 5<T<6sec Data[2] Data[3] Data[5] A R B Buffered at B. Ack[2] B received Data[2] which was in-order, so it sends an Ack[2]. T=6sec Data[3] Data[4] A R B Data[5] Buffered at B. Ack[2] B receives Data[3] and can send a Cumulative Ack for Data[3],Data[4] and Data[5]

  30. Solution Ctd. Data[6] T=6+sec A R B Ack[2] Ack[5] Cumulative Data[6] 6<T<7 sec A R B Ack[5] Cumulative Data[9] Data[6] Data[8] Data[7] A R B T=7+sec Ack[5] Ack[6] Cumulative

  31. Problem#5: Description Suppose we run: • A sliding Window Protocol (or algorithm) • With SWS=5, RWS=3 • And no out of order arrivals

  32. Problem#5 : Questions? • What is the smallest value for MaxSeqNum? Hint: Assume that it suffices to find the smallest MaxSeqNum such that if Data[MaxSeqNum] is in the receive window, Data[0] can no longer arrive. • Give an example showing that MaxSeqNum-1 is not sufficient. • State a general rule for the minimum MaxSeqNum in terms of SWS and RWS.

  33. Part (a) Solution • The smallest working value for MaxSeqNum is SWS+RWS= 5 +3 =8. • The earliest possible receive window is Data[6], Data[7], Data[8]. • Data[5] was delivered and Acknowledged. • Since SWS=5, all Data[0]s were sent before Data[5] and by the “no out of order” hypothesis, Data[0] can no longer arrive.

  34. Part (b) Solution • MaxSeqNum-1=7 is not enough because: • When the receiver is expecting Data[7], an old Data[0] can still arrive. • 0 and 7 are indistinguishable in mod (MaxSeqNum-1) so receiver can not tell which one has arrived. • Consider this example: • Sender sends Data[0] through Data[4] and they all arrive so receiver sends Ack[4] but it’s slow. • The receive window is now Data[5],Data[6] and Data[7]. • Sender times out and retransmits Data[0]. • Receiver accepts it as Data[7].

  35. Part (c) Solution • A general rule for minimum MaxSeqNum in terms of SWS and RWS: MaxSeqNum >= SWS+ RWS

  36. Problem#6: Description Suppose we run: • A sliding Window Protocol (or algorithm) • With SWS=RWS=3 • And no out of order arrivals • And infinite-precision sequence numbers

  37. Problem#6 : Questions? • If Data[6] is in the receive window, Data[0] (or in general any older data) can no longer arrive (hence that MaxSeqNum = 6 would have sufficed). • Show that if Ack[6] may be sent ( or more literally, that DATA[5] is in the sending window) then ACK[2] (or earlier) cannot be received.

  38. Problem #6: Hints • Reminder: Let ACK[N] denote the acknowledgment of all data packets less than N. • Note that data below the sending window (that is, <LAR) is never sent again. • Hence – because out-of-order arrival is disallowed – if DATA[N] arrives at the receiver then nothing at or before DATA[N-3] can arrive later. • Similarly for ACKs, if ACK[N] arrives then (because ACKs are cumulative) no ACK before ACK[N] can arrive later.

  39. Part (a) Solution • If DATA[6] is in the receive window, then the earliest that window can be is DATA[4]-DATA[6]. • This implies ACK[4] was sent, thus DATA[1]-DATA[3] were received, and thus DATA[0] can no longer arrive.

  40. Part (b) Solution • If ACK[6] may be sent, then the lowest the sending window can be is DATA[3]...DATA[5]. • This means that ACK[3] must have been received. • Once an ACK is received, no smaller ACK can ever be received later.

  41. Problem#7 • Design a sliding window ARQ protocol for: • A 1Mbps point-to-point link to the moon • With a one-way latency of 1.25sec • And a frame size of 1KB Minimum number of bits needed for the sequence number? Solution: RTT=2 × 1.25sec=2.5 sec BW=1Mbps=125 KBps Window size=BW × RTT=125KB/sec × 2.5 sec=312 KB or 312 frames Sequence number space= 2 × window size= 2 × 312=624 bits required for sequence number space= log2 624=9.285 ~10 bits

More Related