1 / 11

Incorporating IDEA into a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System

Incorporating IDEA into a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System . Dr. Carole Shaw Northeast State Technical Community College. Presentation Outline . About Northeast State + Principles of Faculty Evaluation IDEA and Faculty Evaluation Practice Activity Questions and Discussion.

rod
Télécharger la présentation

Incorporating IDEA into a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Incorporating IDEA into a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System Dr. Carole Shaw Northeast State Technical Community College

  2. Presentation Outline • About Northeast State + • Principles of Faculty Evaluation • IDEA and Faculty Evaluation • Practice Activity • Questions and Discussion

  3. About Northeast State • Comprehensive community college in Northeast Tennessee • Enrollment- 5200 • Established reputation as a leader and innovator • Built upon a culture of continuous improvement and data-driven decision making • Professional, dedicated non-union faculty

  4. Principles of Faculty Evaluation FACULTY EVALUATION should • Result in improved teaching and learning • Comply with policies and laws • Be consistent and objective • Support overall institutional planning and assessment processes • Be a collaborative process between the faculty member and supervisor • Include clearly stated expectations • Rely upon evidence as well as professional judgment

  5. Northeast State’s Evaluation Process • Two evaluation sessions with between the supervisor and the faculty member • A mid-year review in October • Follow-up to previous spring’s recommendations • Develop individual objectives and initial budget requests (due in December) • Other as determined by Academic Council • A performance review in April • Formal Supervisory Evaluation of Faculty • Includes evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness, Service/Outreach, and Scholarship/Creative Activities/Research

  6. A Challenge: Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness • Teaching effectiveness must comprise at least 51% of the annual performance review. • Student evaluation of instruction is a required component of evaluating teaching effectiveness.

  7. Selecting an Instrument for Student Evaluation of Instruction • Reliable, valid results over time • Comparative data • Compatibility with overall evaluation system • Results that would form basis for measurable improvement • Trend data • Flexible administration • Reasonable cost

  8. Using IDEA • The Supervisory Evaluation of Faculty Instrument • IDEA Summary Report • IDEA Diagnostic Form Report • Faculty Annual Performance Review Checklist • Individual Objective Form • Improvement/Corrective Action Form

  9. Supervisory Evaluation of Faculty • Based on a five-point system that corresponds with IDEA • Allows faculty to select the weight for each of the three components • Requires an improvement for any item of a rating of 1 or 2 • Requires that decisions be supported by evidence • Is accompanied by a faculty self-evaluation and faculty evidence

  10. Simulation-evaluating teaching effectiveness • IDEA results • Teaching Effectiveness items • Need for corrective action www.idea.ksu.edu • Follow-up IDEA results

  11. Questions???? Thank you

More Related