150 likes | 279 Vues
This exploration delves into how Ernest F. Fenollosa and Okakura Tenshin interpreted the relationship between traditional Japanese culture and modernity. The examination contrasts their views on Japan's identity within the broader context of world history versus a self-contained national narrative. Key artifacts such as the Guze Kannon and ancient Western art forms are discussed, revealing how cultural categories can be redefined. The study aims to illustrate the dynamic interplay between historical and modern cultural epistemologies, set against the backdrop of significant Japanese art periods.
E N D
Custom into Tradition Is this how culture is modernized?
Guze Kannon Making modern: categorizing existing artifacts into a new epistemology. “A difference between Okakura and Fenollosa was how Japan was to be located in its expanded realm, as the past of Europe (world history) or as a national unit, with an autonomous past, present, and future.” Tanaka, “Imaging History,” p. 29.
Guze Kannon (Fenollosa) • Archaic Greek art • Han nose • Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa • Archaic stiffness of Egyptian art • Gothic statue from Amiens Source: Mt Holyoke College Interdepartmental images
Guze Kannon (Okakura) • Spider webs from Higashiyama period (1480s) • Wrapped in pieces of sutra • Solemnity and serenity • Style common in Suiko period (593-628) • Head and limb large; pronounced muscles around nose
Asuka (Suiko) period (552-645) • Buddhism • Sui/Tang governing structure • Chinese writing system • Statuary, painting, Buddhist architecture
Symbolic--the mere search Classical Romantic Suiko (Asuka: 6-7th c) Shomu (Nara, 700s) Higashiyama (1480s) Hegel and Herder? The Idea