1 / 14

Liquidity Facilities in Emerging Economies

Liquidity Facilities in Emerging Economies. Housing Finance in Emerging Economies Loïc Chiquier The World Bank March 10-13, 2003. Liquidity Facilities. Issue Bonds, Refinance Mortgage Lenders Help to reduce liquidity and interest rate risks (maturity matching, circumstantial back-stop)

romney
Télécharger la présentation

Liquidity Facilities in Emerging Economies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Liquidity Facilities in Emerging Economies Housing Finance in Emerging Economies Loïc Chiquier The World Bank March 10-13, 2003

  2. Liquidity Facilities • Issue Bonds, Refinance Mortgage Lenders • Help to reduce liquidity and interest rate risks • (maturity matching, circumstantial back-stop) • Minimum risk exposure (limited counterpart risk and market risk, diversified low-risk mortgages as collateral), credit risk to primary lenders (over-collateral refinance or purchase with recourse) • Issue attractive bonds (low risk, sizeable, hopefully liquid, and regular issuance)

  3. Liquidity Facilities (II) • Cheap, robust, simple, secure system to mobilize private bonds and to insure liquidity access to more mortgage lenders with economies of scale. • Less demanding than securitization about legal, regulatory, standards infrastructure, but also more limited ALM capacities (and more capital needed). • Compatible with multiple lenders (specialized or not, depositories,etc.) and alternative funding tools, but not panacea funding solution.

  4. Liquidity Facilities (III) • Prerequisites • Relatively stable macro economic conditions • Active and comprehensive homeownership housing policy (effective legal and regulatory framework for private markets to operate, targeted efficient social housing instruments) • Deregulated financial markets • Transactions exempted from stamp duties/fees • Developed bond market infrastructure • Transition role to SMM conduit (HMC Trinidad) although adaptability challenges.

  5. Liquidity Facilities (IV) • Catalyst liquidity role rather than direct engine (limited impact on FRMs, residual market risks) • Tricky corporate governance client/lender/investor • State support both as investor and bond guarantor (often implicitly): Malaysia , Jordan, Trinidad Gradual privatization FHLBs by members-users French CRH: state bond guarantee for three years • Rather regulatory/supervisory tool than object, although concentrated risks and debt leverage

  6. JMRC in Jordan • Jordan: small and open economy, with a small pre-1998 HF system (privileges Housing Bank) • Since 1998: JMRC operations to develop sound, competitive, and affordable mortgage industry • Mixed public-private capital (18% owned by CBJ) • Refinance participatory eligible banks • Keeps at least 120% over-collateralized mortgages (LTV< 80%, main residence purpose, fee-exempted transferred mortgage deeds, replacing collateral if needed) • Issues private bonds (3-5 Y) and short-term notes • Conservative risk management policy

  7. JMRC (II) • Attractive refinancing and ALM tool for banks (exempted statutory reserves, better regulatory treatment of refinanced loans) • Attractive fixed-rate bullet-bond bonds for investors (social security fund, banks) • Bonds eligible to bank liquidity reserves, 20% risk-weighted for capital adequacy • Catalyst mortgage growth (8,000 loans, 8 banks) • Smooth re-directed banking strategy of the HB

  8. JMRC (III) • Improved housing credit affordability (20 years terms, max. LTV 75%, 10%-13% rates) • Budgetary relief (refinance public housing loans) • Mortgage lending regulatory safeguards • Regular issuer of low-risk private securities (implicit state guarantee) • Prudential lending activities (de facto 153% over- collateral portfolio), effective cost recovery • Key to develop new scheme for low-income civil servants (5% buy down, social housing)

  9. JMRC Perspectives (IV) • Needed Islamic housing debt window (refinance/purchase) • Needed fixed-rate mortgage markets and longer-term bonds (lack of Government benchmarks) • Further gains in credit affordability (credit rates) • Non-recourse purchase of mortgage pools and issue of MBS (needed effective external MI program) • Possible privatization

  10. Malaysia Cagamas Berhad (I) • Created in 1987 after liquidity crunch and recession to provide more liquidity to mortgage lenders, reduce market risks, assist social housing finance, sustain construction sector, develop private fixed-income markets (now 16.6% share) • Cagamas purchases mortgage loans from lenders with recourse and obligation to repurchase (review periods: 3,5,7 years). • Cagamas debt amortized independently from mortgage pools (just collateral)

  11. Malaysia Cagamas Berhad (II) • Islamic Islamic finance window (purchase of deferred payments sales and housing leasing contracts) • Cagamas issues matching term debt (variable-rate loans, fixed-rate securities) • Cagamas as regular rated-AAA issuer

  12. Malaysia Cagamas Berhad (III) • Central Bank (BNM) key investor (20%) as policy tool, capital diversified with 74 fin. institutions, Board chaired by BNM Deputy Governor. • Incentives to lenders (exempted reserves) exposed to social housing lending quotas and rate ceiling. • Incentives to bond investors (eligible to bank and insurance reserves, 10% risk-weighted) • Limited role to renewed short-and medium term refinancing of variable rate mortgage credits

  13. Malaysia Cagamas Berhad (IV) • Catalyst of booming mortgage lending (banks and finance companies) • Outstanding housing through banks: 21.7% GDP • THLD public originator as important initial user • Successful expansion of demand-driven products after 1992 (fixed/variable rate, maturities, recourse /non-recourse, Islamic debt, leasing/commercial property, etc.) • Profitable institution, maybe monopolistic GSE ?

  14. Malaysia Cagamas Berhad (V) • Cagamas successful through its counter-cyclical liquidity role for the markets (“buffer”), and help lenders meet housing lending requirements • Cagamas own mortgage market share normally fluctuates (up to 41% in 1997 as buffer to crisis, now down to 18%) • Less business recently: liquid banks, lower market rates, possible direct securitization by banks • Recent and gradual shift to conduit model But some lenders reluctant to securitize secure and profitable variable-rate mortgage assets, investors want higher yields for longer term amortizing debt, (plus adaptation to regulations, standards)

More Related