1 / 20

SUSY Searches with jets at CDF

SUSY Searches with jets at CDF. Monica D’Onofrio IFAE-Barcelona 34 th International Conference High Energy Physics ICHEP08, Philadelphia. Outline. SUPER. Supersymmetry in few words SUSY Searches using jets: Inclusive production of squarks and gluinos

ronaldthomas
Télécharger la présentation

SUSY Searches with jets at CDF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SUSY Searches with jets at CDF Monica D’Onofrio IFAE-Barcelona 34th International Conference High Energy Physics ICHEP08, Philadelphia

  2. Outline SUPER • Supersymmetry in few words • SUSY Searches using jets: • Inclusive production of squarks and gluinos • Search for third generation squarks: • sbottom from gluino decays • Stop in dilepton+jets sample • Summary and Conclusions ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  3. Supersymmetry • New spin-based symmetry relating fermions and bosons: Q|Boson> = |Fermion> Q|Fermion> = |Boson> gaugino/higgsino mixing • Minimal SuperSymmetric SM (MSSM): • Mirror spectrum of particles • Enlarged Higgs sector: two doublets with 5 physical states • Naturally solve the • hierarchy problem • Define R-parity = (-1)3(B-L)+2s • R = 1 for SM particles • R = -1 for MSSM partners If conserved, provides Dark Matter Candidate (Lightest Supersymmetric Particle) ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  4. MSSM phenomenology • SUSY must be broken • More than 100 parameters even in minimal (MSSM) models • Breaking mechanism determines phenomenologyand search strategy mSUGRA or Constrained MSSM used as benchmark  Squarks and gluinosheavy  1st and 2nd generation squarks are mass degenerate PROSPINO (pb) mixing of 3rd generation leads tolight stop and sbottommass m (GeV) ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  5. 2 fb-1 Inclusive search for squark/gluino mSUGRA: Low tan b scenario (=5) Assume 5-flavors degenerate q Final state: energetic jets of hadrons and large unbalanced transverse energy(due to presence of c0) ~ q ~ ~ ~ c c 0 0 g q g ~ A0 = 0, m<0 M0 [0,500 GeV/c2] m1/2  [50,200 GeV/c2] q 0 c ~ ~ q q ~ ~ c c 0 0 ~ ~ q q g g q ~ Mq ~ Mg qg final state dominates  3 jets expected ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ c c 0 0 ~ q g ~ q q q ~ ~ q q 0 0 c Mq > Mg gg final state dominates  4 jets expected ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c 0 0 Mq < Mg qq final state dominates  2 jets expected ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ q q 3 different analyses carried out with different jet multiplicities Final selection based on Missing ET , HT = S (ETjets) and ET jets ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  6. DiBoson Background rejection Data sample Cleanup • at least one central jet with |h|<1.1 • minimum missing ET of 70 GeV • Reject beam-related backgrounds and cosmics Rejection of SM processes • min Df (missingET-jets) , to reject events with the ET due to jet energy mismeasurement. • Electromagnetic fractionof the jets < 90% to reject electrons mis-identified as jets • min Df (missingET-isolated track)to reject events with ET due to undetected e/m • Z veto • Define signal region based on selections that maximize background rejection ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  7. Results • Check DATA and SM predictions in control samples first • Then look at the signal regions: Good agreement between Observed and Expected events Syst. uncertainties dominated by (3%) Jet Energy scale uncertainty ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  8. Exclusion limits Use Bayesian approach 95% C.L. Exclusion limit on MgMq and M0M1/2 planes ~ ~ • When Mg=Mq → M > 392GeV/c2 • Mg < 280 GeV/c2 excluded in any case ~ ~ • LEP limit improved in the region where 75<M0<250 and 130<M1/2<170 [GeV/c2 ] ~ ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  9. Third squarks generation ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  10. 1.8 fb-1 Searches for sbottom quark b ~ ~ ~ b c c 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ g g b ~ • In large mixing scenarios light sbottom expected (large tan b) • Dedicated searches for b production (B.R. (bb c0) = 100%) • direct pair production or b from gluino decays • sgg ~ 10 sbb , consider region • Assume gluino mass larger than sbottom mass Final state: ET + 4 b-jets b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c 0 0 ~ ~ g g ~ b b B-jets identified via tagging algorithms • Main background processes: • QCD-multijets • light-flavor jets tagging (“mistag”) • Top production, W/Z+jets, diboson •  Predictions tested in Control Regions QCD-dominated region ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  11. Results ~ ~ • Two optimizations used to maximize S/√B, depending on the difference between m(g) and m(b) • Large Dm: • Missing ET>145 GeV • Njet >=3 • Small Dm: • Missing ET>175 GeV • Njet >=2 Good agreement between DATA and SM predictions ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  12. Exclusion limits Excluded s above 0.1 pb (M(g) ~ 350 GeV/c2) Translated into limits on the gluino-sbottom mass plane ~ ~ Sbottom masses up to 300 GeV/c2 are excluded for M(g)<340 Gev/c2 ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  13. 2.7 fb-1 Seaches for stop quark • Lightest of the squarks • 2-, 3- and 4-body decays possible: • c0 is the LSP, q, l, n are heavy, Rp conserved • Ifand , dominant stop decay mode is to b quark and chargino: ~ ~ ~ ~ • Signature: Missing ET, 2 b-jets and • twoopposite-sign leptons Topology depends on Dm = mt1 - mc ~ ~0 • Main background: top production ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  14. Exclusion limits • Depending on the SUSY parameters, c1± may decay • in several ways, potentially enhancing the di-lepton branching ratio ~ Limits in stop-neutralino mass plane ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  15. Summary and conclusions • Extensive searches for squarks and gluinos carried out in CDF dedicated analysis. • No evidence of SUSY in ~2 fb-1 of data • Most constraining direct limits on q and g masses to date • On-going searches on sbottom and stop production in other complementary final states • Tevatron is performing really well: more than 3.5 fb-1 recorded ~ ~ Itmaybethatthefirst SUSY hintis justaroundthecorner... ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  16. Back-up

  17. The CDF experiment Delivered: 4.46 fb-1 Acquired: 3.65 fb-1 Recording data with high efficiency (80-85%) and making full use of detector capabilities. ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  18. EWK GUT mSUGRA • New superfields in “hidden” sector • Interact gravitationally with MSSM • Soft SUSY breaking 5 parameters at GUT scale 1. Unified gaugino mass m1/2 2. Unified scalar mass m0 3. Ratio of H1, H2 vevs tanβ 4. Trilinear coupling A0 5. Higgs mass term sgn() In R parity conservation scenario, the LSP is the neutralino (c01 ) ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  19. 2.0 fb-1 Exclusive 2jets+MET • Signature-based search • select events with 2 jets (ETjet3 < 15 GeV) and missing ET in the final state • 2 regions defined: • A. HT > 125 GeV , Missing ET > 80 GeV • B. HT > 225 GeV, Missing ET > 100 GeV •  Background estimation performed with data-driven techniques SM predictions compared to data. A B Express results in terms of 95% CL upper limits 4 representative (ms,mg) points in the no-mSUGRA regions ● ● ● ● ruled out ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

  20. Exclusion limits for stop searches • Depending on the SUSY parameters, c1± may decay • in several ways, potentially enhancing the di-lepton branching ratio ~ Limits in stop-neutralino mass plane Example of expected limit and systematic uncertainties ICHEP08, Philadelphia, 7/31/2008

More Related