1 / 28

Yellow Flags and Exercise Treatment: Predictor or Result of Poor Outcome?

Yellow Flags and Exercise Treatment: Predictor or Result of Poor Outcome?. Ron Donelson, MD, MS SelfCare First, LLC. Red Flags.  Yellow Flags.  Others. Black Flags Family and system factors (insurance claim conflicts, overly solicitous family or health care provider). Red flags

Télécharger la présentation

Yellow Flags and Exercise Treatment: Predictor or Result of Poor Outcome?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Yellow Flags and Exercise Treatment:Predictor or Result of Poor Outcome? Ron Donelson, MD, MS SelfCare First, LLC

  2. Red Flags Yellow Flags  Others Black Flags Family and system factors (insurance claim conflicts, overly solicitous family or health care provider) Red flags Indicators of underlying insidious pathology: spine fracture, tumor, infx Yellow flags (Kendall 1997) Unhelpful beliefs about pain/emotional responses/pain behavior & coping Blue Flags Beliefs about workplace (lack of support from supervisors, co-workers); belief that return will cause injury Orange flags Psychiatric sxs and disorders: Axis I and II disorders Main & Burton, 2000; Nicholas, et al, 2011

  3. Yellow Flags Psychological and social factors that increase the likelihood of long-term disability and work loss in persons with low back pain. But not always.

  4. Yellow flags: “Obstacles to Recovery” More questions than answers.. • Some YFs are indeed obstacles to recovery that need attention. • But some aren’t. They’re false-positives. • Q#1: How do we know which are which?

  5. WARNING: Diagnosing low back pain means sorting through many false-positives or misleading findings Unreliable exam findings: asymmetries, tenderness Referred tenderness: SIJ, myofascial trigger points,pyriformis, trochanteric bursitis Imaging: HNPs and DDD in symptomatics Q#2: Which findings are relevant? False-positives?

  6. Q#3: Why are YFs sorelevant with LBP? Why aren’t they also prominent with abdominal, chest, shoulder, hip or knee pain? Or even spinal fractures, HNPsand sciatica?

  7. Q#4: Are YFs only relevant whenthe underlying diagnosis is uncertain? Would making a patho-mechanical diagnosis (DP?) early make a difference? Would making a diagnosisearly make a difference?

  8. Q#5: Do YFs cause pain to persist or does persisting pain cause YFs to develop? OR BOTH?

  9. Consider: Dir. pref. and centralization are found in most LBP patients and predict an excellent prognosis for recovery. In contrast, YFs are considered to be possible obstacles to recovery. Do they ever co-exist?If so, which prevails?

  10. Centralization and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Centralizers have lower involvement of psychological factors. The presence of yellow flags (elevated fear-avoidance beliefs) was associated with non-centralization. Christiansen D, et al. Pain responses in rpted end-range spinal mvts and psycho’l factors in sick-listed pts with LBP: is there an association? J Rehabil Med. 2009.

  11. Centralization and Fear-Avoidance Fear-avoidance was equally present in centralizers and non-centralizers. Even with high fear, centralization still predicted a good outcome in the majority. So in centralizers, addressing fear-avoidance beliefs is unnecessary. If centralization is not present, but high levels of fear are, formal cognitive behavioral techniques should be used to address these beliefs. Werneke M, Hart D, George S. Clinical outcomes for patients classified by fear-avoidance beliefs and centralization phenomenon. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2009

  12. In 223 acute back and neck pain centralizers with a DP: • Yellow flags were common: • non-organic physical signs, overt pain behaviors, depressive symptoms, somatization, fear-avoidance beliefs, and perceived disability. • When treated with directional exercises, the outcomes at one year were so positive, the yellow flags werenon-predictors of outcome. Werneke M, Hart DL. Centralization phenomenon as a prognostic factor for chronic low back pain and disability. Spine 2001

  13. In 71 patients with a dir. pref.: Both Beck Depression Inventory and Interference With Work and Leisure Activity significantly improved after just two weeks of matching directional exercises only. It is futile to conduct prognostic studies without including baseline centralization/DP determination. Long A, Donelson R, Fung T. Does it matter which exercise? A randomized controlled trial of exercise for low back pain. Spine 2004

  14. All studies of LBP outcome predictors need to include baseline determination of the presence or absence of both:Yellow FlagsDirectional Preference

  15. On the other hand….. with directional preference so common and so strongly predictive of good outcomes with appropriate directional treatment…. How important is baselineYellow Flag determination? Yellow flags may only have relevance if MDT evaluation and treatment fail…. Along with imaging, injections, and surgeries.

  16. As high quality MDT becomes thefront-line of care for painful cervicaland lumbar disorders…. yellow flags, imaging, medications, injections, and surgeries need only be considerations for a small percentage of patients.

  17. FEVER a non-specific symptom that once was attributed to non-physical issues: immorality, lack of faith, etc. But innovative diagnostic technologies: microscope  microbes  infection, and sensitivities to antibiotics. > 60% of health care budget  14%.

  18. How common is dir. pref.: a reducible derangement? Acute Chronic Prevalence of dir. pref. & centralization: • Donelson (Spine 1990) 84-89 % • Sufka (JOSPT, 1998) 60-83 % • Werneke (Spine, 1999) 77 % • Karas (Phys. Ther. 1997) 73 % • Donelson (Spine 1991, ISSLS 1991) 58 % • Delitto (Phys. Ther. 1993) 61 % • Erhard (Phys. Ther. 1995) 55 % • Kopp (CORR, 1986) 52 % • Long (Spine, 1995) 43 % • Donelson (Spine ,1997) 49 % • Laslett (Spine Jrnl, 2005) 32 % Acute, Chronic Axial pain, Sciatica Degenerative disc Pseudo-claudication Spondys

  19. Acute: 70-89% reducible derangements Many became irreducible chronics Undiscovered whileacute and subacute. Misdiagnosed Misdiagnosed QTF: “inaccurate dxs which are then further confounded with each succeeding step in care” Missed window of opportunity LOST window of opportunity Ineffective, costly, avoidable care Ineffective, costly, avoidable care Chronic: 50% reducible Yellow flags, MRIs, medications, injections, surgeries Yellow Flags

  20. 69 non-centralizers underwent TESIs. After TESIs, MDT exam repeated 46% Yellow Flags? 22% Centralizers 16% 16% 38% Non-Centralizers van Helvoirt H, et. al. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections followed by Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy to prevent surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Pain Medicine. 2014.

  21. Recurrences: Benign or Worsening? • Survey of 589 respondents with LBP: • 73% had prior episodes; 54% had 10 or more and 19% had more than 50 episodes. • 61% had recent episodes worse than prior ones; 21% were worse in all 5 surveyed domains. • Conclusion: Recurrences often worsen over time. Donelson R, McIntosh G, Hamilton H. Is it time to rethink the typical courseof low back pain? Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Journal. 2012.

  22. Recurrences often progressively worsen and last longer…. Until recovery finally stops……and pain becomes constant and chronic? Are worsening recurrences acommon a pathway to chronicity?

  23. Ques: If dir. pref. is found in 70-90% ofacute LBP, predicts excellentoutcomes and prevents recurrences using directional exercises, what is the biggest obstacle to recovery? Answer: Depriving patients ofa good MDT assessment. A far more significant obstaclethan the presence of yellow flags?

  24. Acute: 70-89% reducible derangements All preventable! Chronic: 30%(?) now irreducible Accurate mechanical diagnosis when acute or subacute Chronic: 50% reducible

  25. So are YFs the biggest obstacle to recovery from LBP and neck pain? Not if their influence disappears in the presence of a dir. pref. If 70-89% of acute LBP have a dir. pref., then YFs are only relevant in the other 11-30%.

  26. To minimize the effects of Yellow Flags, LBP clinical guidelines recommend reassurance of likely recover…..based on the positive natural history. What could possibly be more reassuring than showing a patient that their pain is reversible and that they can eliminate it themselves? Is that why Yellow Flags disappearas obstacles to recovery with Dir. Pref.?

  27. Red Flags  Yellow Flags    Black Flags Family and system factors (insurance claim conflicts), overly solicitous family or health care provider Red flags Indicators of underlying insidious pathology: spine fracture, tumor, infx Yellow flags (Kendall 1997) Unhelpful beliefs about pain /emotional responses / pain behavior & coping Blue Flags Beliefs about workplace (lack of support from supervisors, co-workers; belief that return will cause injury Green Flag Directional preference / centralization Orange flags Psychiatric sxs and disorders: Axis I and II disorders Main & Burton, 2000; Nicholas, et al, 2011

More Related