180 likes | 294 Vues
This document outlines the challenges faced by the mobile sector in the European Union from the perspective of the European Commission. It details the implementation of the new regulatory framework, focusing on market definition, analysis, and the obligations of significant market players (SMP). Key aspects include competition effectiveness, market characteristics, obligations on transparency, non-discrimination, access, pricing, and number portability. The framework aims to ensure effective competition while balancing regulatory efforts with the market's needs.
E N D
The Challenges for the Mobile SectorThe European Commission’s perspectivePearse O’DonohueEuropean Commission DG INFSOImplementation of the Regulatory Framework
New Framework - Procedures 1. Market definition 2. Market Analysis 3. Designation of SMP 4. Obligations - Consultation: nationally, other M/S NRAs & Commission - Possible Commission veto
Different stages of the analysis • Relevant Markets - Commission Recommendation • product aspect of the market NRA input Commission Guidelines NRA Market definition taking account of the Commission Recommendation define geographical aspects define other product markets, following Art 7 FWD NRA removes existing obligations - does not impose new obligations competition is effective NRA analysis is competition effective ? dominance test/SMP designation NRA designates SMP operator(s) - maintains or modifies existing obligations, or imposes new obligations competition not effective
SMP/Dominance Assessment • Single: • Evolution of market shares • Potential competition and barriers to entry • Control of essential facilities • Joint dominance: • “oligopolistic markets the structure of which was considered conductive to coordinated effects” • Market characteristics: concentration, transparency, retaliatory mechanisms. • Leveraging
Obligations / Remedies • Transparency • Non-discrimination • Accounting Separation • Access to, and use of, specific network facilities • Price control and cost accounting - cost orientation • Other access obligations...
Obligations to be proportionate and based on the problem found • Leveraging • transparency • non-discrimination and accounting separation • access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities • Prices at an excessively high level or price squeezes • price control • accounting separation and cost- accounting 27
Appeals on NRA decisions • National legal systems must allow for appeals on NRA decisions • Appeal body may be a court or tribunal • Merits of the case must be taken into account
Dispute resolution • National level • resolve in 4 months • refer to alternative dispute resolution mechanisms • results must be in conformity with the framework • Cross-border • co-ordination of NRAs concerned to resolve in 4 months
Transposition - Timeline 25.7.2003 Date of application in all MS 24.4.2002 Entry into force 15 months M States transpose, but don’t apply NRAs do market analyses
NRAs - data gathering • Market analysis key aspect of new framework • need for comprehensive and accurate overview of markets • interest and obligation of market players • consultation mechanisms • possibility of streamlining once systems in place
Mobile Markets • Access and call origination on public mobile telephone networks • Voice call termination on individual mobile networks • The wholesale national market for international roaming on public mobile networks
MVNOs NRAs may impose obligations to meet reasonable requests for access, including inter alia: - resale - intelligent network services - roaming Obligations must be proportionate Effect on competition (short term) and investment (long term)
Number Portability • Mobile number portability must be available under new framework • Pricing for interconnection related to portability to be cost oriented • Charges to subscribers should not act as a disincentive • No imposition of retail tariffs that would distort competition
Roaming • Wholesale national market for international roaming targeted • Evidence of excessive charges • DG COMP sectoral enquiry and specific investigations • Introduction of local/national roaming
3G • Delays in roll-out • Equipment and services • License sunk costs • Developments in WiFi / RLAN • Intermediate market / 2.5G • Coordinated measures at EU level
Radio Spectrum • Allocation & assignment based on transparent, objective, non-discriminatory & proportionate criteria • Auctions & beauty contests permitted • Spectrum trading an option for Member States two conditions: • no distortion of competition • no threat to harmonisation
DG Information Society:http://europa.eu.int/information_society/topics/telecoms/index_en.htm Pearse O’DonohueEuropean Commission DG INFSOImplementation of the Regulatory Framework