340 likes | 489 Vues
This document explores the critical challenges faced in drug discovery, particularly the 'valley of death' where promising scientific ideas often struggle to transition from laboratory to market. It discusses the role of the Biomedical Catalyst in securing funding to support innovative research, focusing on recent advancements and case studies, including the work of Dr. Kevin Adams at the Institute of Cancer Therapeutics and Incanthera Ltd. Insights into venture capital approaches, market expectations, and the strategies for successful drug development are highlighted, addressing industry-wide implications and future directions.
E N D
Successfully securing funding Drug discovery to University Spin-out Dr Kevin Adams Institute of Cancer Therapeutics and Incanthera Ltd
The valley of death Declan Butler (2008) Nature453, 840-842
5 hills and 4 valleys Meslin et al (2013) Mapping the translational science policy ‘valley of death’ Clinical and Translational Medicine 2013, 2:14
The valley of death In vivo proof of concept First in man clinical trial
…or is it? Bruce Booth, Forbes 22 May 2013
Biomedical catalyst • Through targeted funding, the Biomedical Catalyst aims to bridge the so-called ‘valley of death' which can exist in getting ideas out of the lab and into the marketplace. • The report shows that, in just over a year since it opened, the Biomedical Catalyst has: • awarded over £120m in funding, over £80m of which is to support innovative, business-led research • leveraged almost £70m of additional, project-specific private capital. • Over 100 projects from all over the UK have been supported.
Big pharma are failing • Not getting new drugs through trials • Not getting new drugs to market • Pipelines are poor for many
Consequences of failure • Rethinking strategy • Closing internal R&D sites • Looking for late stage deals – short term • Looking to pick up molecules from small biotechs and research institutes – longer term • We need to see this as an opportunity
Big pharma as VCs • Most of the big pharma companies have recently set up “investment companies” • But everyone is trying to attract their interest. • Supposedly looking at early stage investment • But generally still want to see Phase 1 clinical data • Need to have a good strategic fit.
Pharma influences VCs • Size of failures has an impact on how VCs view risk. The more risky the less likely they are to put up money. • Venture capitalists like to invest in things that they think big pharma will like. • Need to consider this when constructing a pitch • Sometimes investments aren’t always as rational as you might expect.
Trending in cancer. PhRMA (2012): Medicines in Development Cancer, 2012 Report This lists nearly 1000 anti-cancer drugs at preclinical and clinical development stage in the US alone http://www.phrma.org/sites/default/files/1000/phrmamedicinesindevelopmentcancer2012.pdf
So what are pharma thinking? • Analyses of these US cancer projects show that just eight drug targets account for around 40% of all projects in preclinical or clinical stages of development. • Each of these eight targets was identified as having at least 24 individual clinical programmes Bruce Booth (2012): Cancer Drug Targets: The March of the Lemmings http://lifescivc.com/2012/06/cancer-drug-targets-the-march-of-the-lemmings/
It might be unfair to lemmings but.. Serine/threoninekinase Receptor tyrosine kinase Receptor tyrosine kinase Receptor tyrosine kinase Receptor tyrosine kinase Phosphatidylinositol 3' -kinase Receptor tyrosine kinase Receptor tyrosine kinase
Start-up • What do all these messages mean for a start-up gazing across the valley of death. • Need to use this sort of information to develop your strategy. • For me there are four things to focus on to give the best chance of success.
Product - ICT2588, a targeted cytotoxic Non-specific exopeptidase activity Azademethylcolchicine Specific endo-peptidase cleavage by MT1-MMP
8 7 Control 6 5 ICT-2552 (60mg/kg) 4 ICT-2588(150mg/kg) [30mg/kg metabolite] 3 Mean relative tumour volume 2 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Time (Days ) Product • Targeted • Non-toxic • Kills tumours
Protection • Three patents • First nearing end of national phase – recently granted in US • Second in national phase • Third recently filed – in conjunction with Stanford University
People • Academic inventors still involved but in the background • CEO Dr Simon Ward, serial entrepreneur with good VC connections • Executive Director Dr Alan Warrander, former Director of Global Licensing at AZ • Me as programme manager – background in industry • Professor Chris Twelves – clinical oncology lead • People are very important to VCs
Plan • Know where you are and where you need to get to. • Be honest and realistic about what you do/don’t know – find someone who does. • Break it down into individual task with key value added milestones. • Get some quotes for work to be done – realistic costs. • Build in contingency and timeline flexibility. • Understand the cash flow but more importantly the exit. • Phase 1, Phase 2 or later?.
Plan • Elevator pitch • Executive summary • Business pitch • Business plan • Practice and refine all the above but most importantly get out and deliver.
Plan • Listen for feed back • Learn from it • Anticipate the negatives and turn to your advantage
Refining the Incanthera plan VC response in general was • MMPs – failed as a target previously • VDAs – failed in clinic • Cytotoxics are old fashioned
From Overall and Kleifeld (2006), Nature Reviews:Cancer 6:227-239
MMP inhibitors fail • Good news – • MMPs are clearly a valid target • More importantly, we aren’t trying to inhibit MMPs but are using their localised expression to target tumour vasculature
VDA failures • Compounds include • ASA404, • ABT-751, • Dolastatin-10, • TZT-1027, • ZD6126, • CA1P and CA4P • MPC-6827 • MN-029. • In all cases, cardiac toxicities are prevalent. Hollebecque et al (2012) CurrOpinOncol. 24(3):305-315.
VDAs fail • Good news – • clearly pharma wants a good VDA • targeting overcomes cardiotoxissue • ICT2588 even mentioned in Hollebecque et al (2012) as being a good way to overcome the problem.
Cytotoxics • Yes they are old fashioned... • ...but they work! • Many of the most effective and widely used cancer drugs are still cytotoxics.
Incanthera success • Took 2 years to get first funding of £350K – beware University legal teams – signed off in December 2011 • A year later (end 2012) we were up to £1.2 million • US based VC • UK based Angel consortium • This year we’ve had a letter from the WellcomeTrust offering investment of around £1.6 million in the form of a convertible loan (subject to contract).
Incanthera the future • Enough funding to complete Phase 1 (subject to contract) • Scale up chemistry and formulation development done. • Toxicology studies currently being done • Hope to start clinical trial by summer of 2014 • A successful trial will probably result in a sale/licensing of the technology • Aim to retain some of that funding for pipeline.