1 / 2

Padmavati protest: Why it is a thorn in our flesh and freedom of expression

Padmavati protest: Why it is a thorn in our flesh and freedom of expression on Business Standard. Khilji defeating Rana Ratan Singh of Chittor in 1303 is a historical fact but there is no evidence of the existence of Padmavati back then<br>

rosejames789
Télécharger la présentation

Padmavati protest: Why it is a thorn in our flesh and freedom of expression

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Business Standard Padmavati protest: Why it is a thorn in our flesh and freedom of expression The lead couple Deepika Padukone and Shahid Kapur have been trolled for speaking up for the movie It's that time of the year again when our sentiments are hurt, and it is acceptable to temporarily suspend liberal democracy because of it. The latest victim of the now-

  2. ubiquitous tyranny of hurt sentiments has been Sanjay Leela Bhansali's "Padmavati", which has been accused of twisting historical "facts". After a series of unfortunate events over the last week pertaining to the movie, which involved a couple of death threats, its makers have been left with no option but to "voluntarily defer" the release date. Moreover, Madhya Pradesh and Punjab have been happy to oblige the groups issuing death threats and inspiring violence by banning the film from their states. Likewise, Uttar Pradesh has urged a delay in the release of the movie fearing law and order problems. This begs the question whether the onus of law and order lies with the government or the creative community? Should filmmakers limit their freedom of expression and contemplate the law and order consequences of their work? ALSO READ: Padmavati row: Maharashtra min seeks ban; Ranveer extends support, and more The situation seems even more ludicrous and bizarre when it is realised that the protagonist of the movie around which the controversy is centred is, in fact, a fictional character based on a half-fantastical epic poem of the 16th century by a Sufi poet. Rani Padmavati makes her first appearance in history in poet Malik Muhammad Jayasi's "Padmavat", which narrates a tale of Alauddin Khilji's siege of Chittor that had happened in the 14th century. In the poem, Khilji, upon hearing of Padmavati's beauty, marches towards Chittor to demand her hand in marriage and manages to defeat her husband. But, before he could reach her, Padmavati commits jauhar (self-immolation). Now, Khilji defeating Rana Ratan Singh of Chittor in 1303 is a historical fact but there is no evidence of the existence of anyone by the name of Padmavati back then. There is also no historical evidence that the desire for a woman played any role in Khilji's attack on Chittor………..read more

More Related