1 / 17

Overview of the Study

The Balance between Teaching and Research: The Development of a Survey Instrument to Assess Factors that Affect MIS Research. Rich McCarthy – Quinnipiac University, George Claffey – Central Connecticut State University, Bruce White – Quinnipiac University. Overview of the Study.

rosemaryjohnson
Télécharger la présentation

Overview of the Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Balance between Teaching and Research: The Development of a Survey Instrument to Assess Factors that Affect MIS Research Rich McCarthy – Quinnipiac University, George Claffey – Central Connecticut State University, Bruce White – Quinnipiac University McCarthy/Claffey/White

  2. Overview of the Study • Prolific authors were surveyed using a qualitative questionnaire for the purpose of obtaining data on the factors that motivate their research. This study reports upon the completion of a pilot study in the development of a quantitative research instrument to evaluate the factors that affect MIS research. McCarthy/Claffey/White

  3. Academic Life • A balance between teaching, research and service. • What should this balance be? • What minimums should there be for research for promotion and tenure? • What motivates IS research? McCarthy/Claffey/White

  4. Study • To understand IS research, the authors: • Did a comprehensive study of research motivational factors in other disciplines • Did a pilot evaluation of prolific authors in IS • This led to the development of a survey instrument which will be used in follow-up studies. McCarthy/Claffey/White

  5. Literature Review • We studied: • Communications Journals where we saw that top ranked programs were consistently the most productive in terms of publications. • Marital and Family Therapy journals • Transportation • Business communications McCarthy/Claffey/White

  6. Writing habits • Blaszczynski’s study of business education researchers using a 17-item questionnaire covering topics such as writing habits, writing fulfillment, writing strategies, and advice to researchers was the initial basis for identifying factors that affect MIS research. • It was felt that the topics were broad enough to have applicability to the field of management information systems. • Open-ended questions modified to be applied to MIS McCarthy/Claffey/White

  7. Premier MIS journals • We selected five journals to focus on for our study. Previous journals and citation studies suggested that these journals are considered “premier” MIS journals. • These are given on the next slide McCarthy/Claffey/White

  8. Premier MIS journals • Information & Management January, 1996- October, 2001 Vol. 30-38 • Information Systems Research March, 1996 – December, 2001 Vol. 7-12 • Journal of Management Information Systems Summer, 1996 – Spring 2001 Vol. 13-17 • Management Science January, 1996 – December, 2001 Vol. 42-47 • MIS Quarterly March 1, 1996 – December 1, 2001 Vol. 20-25 McCarthy/Claffey/White

  9. Articles and Authors McCarthy/Claffey/White

  10. Prolific Authors: • There were 213 authors who published three or more times in the journals reviewed. • 71 of these authors came from 13 universities (see next chart) McCarthy/Claffey/White

  11. Schools with most prolific authors McCarthy/Claffey/White

  12. Study - continued • The 213 authors were selected as the sample population for the qualitative analysis based upon their authorship in these top-ranked MIS journals. The questionnaire was distributed via email. This resulted in 38 responses (a response rate of 18%). The qualitative data within the thirty-eight responses was then analyzed to determine the factors that would be used to analyze MIS research. McCarthy/Claffey/White

  13. How Often do they write (an example of a quantitative question)? McCarthy/Claffey/White

  14. Factors: • Based upon our analysis of the responses we have identified the following factors that affect MIS research: • Experience • Teaching load • Teaching recognition • Serving as an editor • Serving as a dissertation advisor/committee member • Frequency of research • Service requirements • Location McCarthy/Claffey/White

  15. Future Study • We will construct a quantitative survey based upon these factors to test their relationship to MIS research productivity. In addition, the survey will also include a continuation of the research into the area of idea generation. McCarthy/Claffey/White

  16. Future Study - continued • This paper presents the initial step in a research study intended to empirically identify factors that affect MIS research. The authors will develop a research model based upon the results of the pilot survey and validate that model by surveying a wide audience of MIS authors. The survey will consist of research factors identified as a result of this pilot and codified on a Likert scale. McCarthy/Claffey/White

  17. Questions? McCarthy/Claffey/White

More Related