1 / 22

Volume and Nature of Patient Telephone Calls in a Large Movement Disorders Center

Volume and Nature of Patient Telephone Calls in a Large Movement Disorders Center. O.R. Adam, MD; L.G. Aguilar Tabora, MD; J. Ferrara, MD; M. Nashatizadeh, MD; J. Jankovic, MD The Parkinson’s Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas. Background.

rosina
Télécharger la présentation

Volume and Nature of Patient Telephone Calls in a Large Movement Disorders Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Volume and Nature of Patient Telephone Calls in a Large Movement Disorders Center O.R. Adam, MD; L.G. Aguilar Tabora, MD; J. Ferrara, MD; M. Nashatizadeh, MD; J. Jankovic, MD The Parkinson’s Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas

  2. Background • Parkinson Disease Center and Movement Disorders Center (PDCMDC), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas • Established in 1977 – a total of 26,000 patients in database, averaging 1,500 new patients/year/last 5 years • 4 fellows rotate on “callbacks” one week at a time • On-call schedule for after hours and weekend patient calls

  3. Background • One fellow at Columbia University Medical Center: • 263 new patients/year • 116 follow up patients/year • 15 inpatient consults/year • Patient care: 25 hours/week • Above volume and experience are comparable to that at the PDCMDC, BCM • Fellowship training in Movement Disorders • Clinic patients (new, follow-up) • Botulinum Toxin • DBS • Video rounds • Conferences and lectures • Movement Disorders Journal Club • Research Portera-Cailliau C, Victor D, Frucht S, Fahn S., Movement Disorders Fellowship Training Program at Columbia University Medical Center in 2001-2002; MovDisord 2005;21:479-85.

  4. Background • Patient telephone calls are part of the movement disorders fellow training • “Mini” follow-ups providing the opportunity for the fellows to make independent decisions regarding the patient’s management • Movement disorders patients are unique

  5. Objective • The nature, volume, and time allocation of patient-related telephone calls in a movement disorders center. • A secondary aim of this study was to determine the distribution of movement disorders diagnostic categories requiring callbacks.

  6. Methods • Patient telephone calls received by movement disorders fellows and faculty physicians at the PDCMDC, Baylor College of Medicine • Period: 2 months (08/06/08 – 10/06/08) • Excluded: medication refills, pharmacy calls, study related questions, authorization and other health insurance related calls

  7. Methods • Date • Time • Means • Caller • Demographics • Diagnosis • Date of last clinic visit • Number of medications and number of changes in the medications at the last visit • Reason and outcome of the telephone call • Telephone call duration

  8. Methods

  9. Results • Total number of callbacks: 633 • Total number of patients: 397 • Patient type: • New: 80 (20.15%) • Established: 317 (79.85%) • Mean age: 57.75 ± 21.45 • Average amount of time spent on the phone: • Per call: 6.59 min • Per day: 95 min (time recorded only by fellows)

  10. Results

  11. Results

  12. Results

  13. Diagnosis DistributionCallback (CB) vs Clinic Sample *Two-sample t-test

  14. One Time Callers (OC) vs Repeat Callers (RC) *two sample t-test

  15. Is the Diagnosis Distribution of RC different from OC? *two-sample t-test

  16. Characteristics OC vs RC *two-sample t-test

  17. Call Reason Distribution per Diagnostic Groups (p<0.0001, Chi Square)

  18. Conclusions • Patient telephone calls are time consuming: average 90 minutes/day/fellow • Patients who call more often and/or require longer conversations are: • PD (48%) • Atypical parkinsonism (5%) • Tourette syndrome (13%) • The main questions asked are: • Disease related (35%) • Medication related (21%) • Side effects (15%) • The main outcomes are: • Changes in medications (43%) • Counseling (21%) • Referral to the ER (1%) • 51% of calls were placed by someone other than the patient

  19. Possible Solutions • Education at the initial visit (disease, prognosis, complications, treatment, medication side effects etc.) • Written educational hand-outs • Support groups • Internet education • Family education

  20. Study Caveats • Short period: 2 months • Situation specific biases • Patient population bias • Cross sectional not longitudinal

  21. Future Studies • Longitudinal • Methods to reduce the volume of callbacks • Assess the possible situation specific variation of callbacks distributed over particular diagnostic groups

More Related