1 / 44

Nested Commits for Mobile Calculi: Extending Join

Nested Commits for Mobile Calculi: Extending Join. Roberto Bruni, Hern án Melgratti and Ugo Montanari. Motivation. To develop a process description language with primitives for agreements or negotiations Multiway (several parties can start separately but commit on reached agreement)

rowdy
Télécharger la présentation

Nested Commits for Mobile Calculi: Extending Join

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nested Commits for Mobile Calculi: Extending Join Roberto Bruni, Hernán Melgratti and Ugo Montanari

  2. Motivation • To develop a process description language with primitives for agreements or negotiations • Multiway (several parties can start separately but commit on reached agreement) • Non-perfect compensations (certain actions cannot be undone) • Programmable abort / compensation • Different levels of abstraction IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  3. Committed Join (cJoin) • Join + primitives for negotiations • Syntax: P,Q ::= 0 | xŷ | def D in P | P|Q D,E ::= JP | DE J,K ::= xŷ | J|K Processes Definitions Patterns IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  4. Committed Join (cJoin) • Join + primitives for negotiations • Syntax: Messages M,N::= 0 | xŷ | M|N P,Q ::= 0 | xŷ | def D in P | P|Q D,E ::= JP | DE J,K ::= xŷ | J|K Processes Definitions Patterns IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  5. Committed Join (cJoin) • Join + primitives for negotiations • Syntax: Messages M,N::= 0 | xŷ | M|N P,Q ::= M | def D in P | P|Q D,E ::= JP | DE J,K ::= xŷ | J|K Processes Definitions Patterns IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  6. Negotiation Compensation Committed Join (cJoin) • Join + primitives for negotiations • Syntax: Messages Programmable abort M,N::= 0 | xŷ | M|N P,Q ::= M | def D in P | P|Q | abort|[P:Q] D,E ::= JP | DE | JP J,K ::= xŷ | J|K Processes Definitions Patterns Merge definition IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  7. Committed Join (cJoin) • Operational Semantics (CHAM Style): heating and cooling reaction IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  8. Committed Join (cJoin) • Operational Semantics (CHAM Style): Contract P evolves in isolation Compensation Q is kept frozen IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  9. Committed Join (cJoin) • Operational Semantics (CHAM Style): Global Resources Commit IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  10. Committed Join (cJoin) • Operational Semantics (CHAM Style): Compensation on Abort IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  11. Committed Join (cJoin) • Operational Semantics (CHAM Style): Merge n ongoing contracts IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  12. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination {[ M | def D in 0 , Q ]}  M IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  13. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  14. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit • Explicit abort and compensation {[ abort | P , Q ]}  Q IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  15. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit • Explicit abort and compensation • Cooperation between contracts are given by merging definitions (multiway contracts) …,J1|J2P, [J1t| P1:Q1], [J2t| P2: Q2]  …,J1|J2 P, [Pt|P1| P2: Q1| Q2] IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  16. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit • Explicit abort and compensation • Cooperation between contracts are given by merging definitions (multiway contracts) • Multi-level nesting [ [P1 :Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q] IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  17. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit • Explicit abort and compensation • Cooperation between contracts are given by merging definitions (multiway contracts) • Multi-level nesting [ [P1 :Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ M1 | [P2:Q2] : Q] IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  18. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit • Explicit abort and compensation • Cooperation between contracts are given by merging definitions (multiway contracts) • Multi-level nesting [ [P1 :Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ M1 | [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ M1 | M2: Q] IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  19. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit • Explicit abort and compensation • Cooperation between contracts are given by merging definitions (multiway contracts) • Multi-level nesting [ [P1 :Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ M1 | [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ M1 | M2 : Q]  M1 | M2 IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  20. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit • Explicit abort and compensation • Cooperation between contracts are given by merging definitions (multiway contracts) • Multi-level nesting [ [P1 :Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ [abort | P1’:Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q] IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  21. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit • Explicit abort and compensation • Cooperation between contracts are given by merging definitions (multiway contracts) • Multi-level nesting [ [P1 :Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ [abort | P1’:Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q]  [ Q1 | [P2:Q2] : Q] IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  22. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit • Explicit abort and compensation • Cooperation between contracts are given by merging definitions (multiway contracts) • Multi-level nesting [ [P1 :Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ [abort | P1’:Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q]  [ Q1| [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ abort | Q1’ | [P2:Q2] : Q] IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  23. Committed Join Features • Commit means termination • Global resources produced inside a negotiation are availableat commit • Explicit abort and compensation • Cooperation between contracts are given by merging definitions (multiway contracts) • Multi-level nesting [ [P1 :Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ [abort | P1’:Q1] | [P2:Q2] : Q]  [ Q1 | [P2:Q2] : Q] * [ abort | Q1’ | [P2:Q2] : Q] Q IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  24. Example I: Hotel Booking H def WaitBooking   [ def requesto  o$ | price$ price$ | confirmv  BookedRoomv price$  abort inofferingRoom request,confirm : Q ] BookedRoomv  … inWaitBooking  | … IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  25. Example I: Hotel Booking H def WaitBooking   [ def requesto  o$ | price$ price$ | confirmv  BookedRoomv price$  abort inofferingRoom request,confirm : Q ] BookedRoomv  … inWaitBooking  | … C def BookingHotel   [defhotelMsgr,cdef offer$  cvisa | HotelFound offer$  abort in roffer insearchRoom hotelMsg : Q’ ] inBookingHotel  | … IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  26. Example I: Hotel Booking H def WaitBooking   [ def requesto  o$ | price$ price$ | confirmv  BookedRoomv price$  abort inofferingRoom request,confirm : Q ] BookedRoomv  … inWaitBooking  | … C def BookingHotel   [defhotelMsgr,cdef offer$  cvisa | HotelFound  offer$  abort in roffer insearchRoom hotelMsg : Q’ ] inBookingHotel  | … HB defsearchRoomhm |offeringRoom r,chmr,c inH | C IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  27. Example I: Hotel Booking …, WaitBooking  , BookingHotel     …, […, offeringRoomrequest,confirm : Q ] , […, searchRoomhotelMsg : Q’]  …, […, hotelMsgrequest,confirm : Q | Q’]  …, […, requestoffer : Q | Q’]  …, […, offer$, price$ : Q | Q’]  …, […, confirmvisa, HotelFound , price$ : Q | Q’]  …, […, BookedRoomvisa, HotelFound   : Q | Q’]  …, BookedRoomvisa, HotelFound  IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  28. Example I: Trip Booking I H as before F def WaitBooking    [ def requesto  o$ | price$ price$ | confirmv  BookedFlightv price$  abort inofferingFlight request,confirm : Q ] BookedFlightv  … inWaitBooking   | … local name, different from homonym name in H IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  29. Example I: Trip Booking II both needed to commit C defhotelOKfc | flightOKhc fc  | hc   BookingHotel  [defhotelMsgr,cdef offer$  cvisa | hotelOKflightConf offer$  abort flightConf HotelFound  in roffer insearchRoom hotelMsg : Q’ ]  BookingFlight [defflightlMsgr,cdef offer$  cvisa | flightOKhotelConf offer$  abort hotelConf FlightFound  in roffer insearchFlight flightMsg : Q’’ ] inBookingHotel | BookingFlight | … IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  30. Example I: Trip Booking II both needed to commit C defhotelOKfc | flightOKhc fc  | hc   BookingHotel  [defhotelMsgr,cdef offer$  cvisa | hotelOKflightConf offer$  abort flightConf HotelFound  in roffer insearchRoom hotelMsg : Q’ ]  BookingFlight [defflightlMsgr,cdef offer$  cvisa | flightOKhotelConf offer$  abort hotelConf FlightFound  in roffer insearchFlight flightMsg : Q’’ ] inBookingHotel | BookingFlight | … TB def searchRoomhm |offeringRoom r,chmr,c searchFlightfm |offeringFlight r,cfmr,c inH | F | C IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  31. Zero-safe nets • Synchronization mechanism for transitions • Places are divided in Stable: Ordinary places Zero-safe: Idealized resources, invisible to external observers IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  32. (Firing) (Step) (Concatenation) (Close) S+Z [  S’+Z’  T (S1,Z1) T (S1’,Z1’) (S2,Z2) T (S2’,Z2’) (S1,Z) T (S1’,Z’’) (S2,Z’’) T (S2’,Z’) (S,) T (S’,) (S+S’’,Z+Z’’) T (S’+S’’,Z’+Z’’) (S1+S2,Z1+Z2) T (S1’+S2’,Z1’ + Z2’) (S1+S2,Z) T (S1’+S2’,Z’) (S,) T (S’,) Zero-safe nets • Synchronization mechanism for transitions • Places are divided in Stable: Ordinary places Zero-safe: Idealized resources, invisible to external observers IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  33. (Close) (Concatenation) (Step) (Firing) (S,) T (S’,) (S1,Z) T (S1’,Z’’) (S2,Z’’) T (S2’,Z’) (S1,Z1) T (S1’,Z1’) (S2,Z2) T (S2’,Z2’) S+Z [  S’+Z’  T (S+S’’,Z+Z’’) T (S’+S’’,Z’+Z’’) (S1+S2,Z) T (S1’+S2’,Z’) (S,) T (S’,) (S1+S2,Z1+Z2) T (S1’+S2’,Z1’ + Z2’) Zero-safe nets • Synchronization mechanism for transitions • Places are divided in Stable: Ordinary places Zero-safe: Idealized resources, invisible to external observers send receive IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  34. (Close) (Concatenation) (Step) (Firing) (S,) T (S’,) (S1,Z) T (S1’,Z’’) (S2,Z’’) T (S2’,Z’) (S1,Z1) T (S1’,Z1’) (S2,Z2) T (S2’,Z2’) S+Z [  S’+Z’  T (S+S’’,Z+Z’’) T (S’+S’’,Z’+Z’’) (S1+S2,Z) T (S1’+S2’,Z’) (S,) T (S’,) (S1+S2,Z1+Z2) T (S1’+S2’,Z1’ + Z2’) Zero-safe nets • Synchronization mechanism for transitions • Places are divided in Stable: Ordinary places Zero-safe: Idealized resources, invisible to external observers send receive IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  35. (Close) (Concatenation) (Step) (Firing) (S,) T (S’,) (S1,Z) T (S1’,Z’’) (S2,Z’’) T (S2’,Z’) (S1,Z1) T (S1’,Z1’) (S2,Z2) T (S2’,Z2’) S+Z [  S’+Z’  T (S+S’’,Z+Z’’) T (S’+S’’,Z’+Z’’) (S1+S2,Z) T (S1’+S2’,Z’) (S,) T (S’,) (S1+S2,Z1+Z2) T (S1’+S2’,Z1’ + Z2’) Zero-safe nets • Synchronization mechanism for transitions • Places are divided in Stable: Ordinary places Zero-safe: Idealized resources, invisible to external observers send receive IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  36. (Close) (Concatenation) (Step) (Firing) (S,) T (S’,) (S1,Z) T (S1’,Z’’) (S2,Z’’) T (S2’,Z’) (S1,Z1) T (S1’,Z1’) (S2,Z2) T (S2’,Z2’) S+Z [  S’+Z’  T (S+S’’,Z+Z’’) T (S’+S’’,Z’+Z’’) (S1+S2,Z) T (S1’+S2’,Z’) (S,) T (S’,) (S1+S2,Z1+Z2) T (S1’+S2’,Z1’ + Z2’) Zero-safe nets • Synchronization mechanism for transitions • Places are divided in Stable: Ordinary places Zero-safe: Idealized resources, invisible to external observers send receive IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  37. Zero-safe nets: Encoding • Given a ZS net N=(T,S): • Places ports • Transitions firing rules • Tokens messages • Encoding of a marking S: [[E]] ::= E  [[S1+S2]] ::= [[S1]] | [[S2]] IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  38. E e1 e e e e1 e2 open calc fork fork close drop e2 e1 e2 e e E Zero-safe nets: Encoding • Encoding of (basic) transitions IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  39. E e1 e e e e1 e2 open calc fork fork close drop e2 e1 e2 e e E Zero-safe nets: Encoding • Encoding of (basic) transitions E  [ def z   0 in ez : E ] e1z e2z ez e1z | e2z e1z1 | e2z2  ez1 ez E  ez 0 IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  40. Zero-safe nets: Encoding • cJoin process for a ZS net Let N=(T,S) be a ZS net, PN = def [[ T ]] in [[ S ]] • Theorem Let N=(T,S) be a ZS net. (S,) * (S’,) iff def [[T]] in [[S]] * def [[T]] in [[S’]] IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  41. Serializability • A serializable transaction admits an abstract representation as a single transition • cJoin negotiations may interact with other negotiations (not serializable in the previous sense) • But all cooperating negotiations can be viewed as a single transition • Moreover, we would like this property to hold at every level of nesting IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  42. nest( 0 ) = nest( abort ) = nest( xŷ ) = 0 nest( def DinP ) = nest(P ) nest( [ P : Q ]) = nest(P ) + 1 nest( P | Q ) = max{nest( P ), nest(Q )} Serializability: Shallowness • Shallow processes: any computation increases the height of nesting structure in at most 1 • P is shallow if every definition D in P satisfies D = JP, where nest(P ) = 0, or P = [ R : Q ] and nest( R | Q ) = 0 D = J P, and nest(P ) = 0 IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  43. (Global Firing) (Abort) (Local Commit) (Idle) D ├ [abort | P : S]  D ├ S D  J P├ J D  J  P├ P D ├ P  D ├ P D ├ [M | D’ ├ 0 : S]  D ├ M (Seq) (Local Firing) (Par) D ├ P  D ├ P’’ D ├ P’’  D ├ P’ |B|├ S  |B|├ S’ D ├ P  D ├ P’ D ├ Q  D ├ Q’ (Merge) D ├ P | Q  D ├ P’ | Q’ D  B ├ [S : Q]  D  B ├ [S’ : Q] D ├ P  D ├ P’ D iJiS├ I [ Di├ Ji| Si : Qi]  D I JiS├ [iDi├ I Si | S: I Qi] Serializability • Serializability as big step reduction relation () between shallow processes • Theorem: S *cJ S’ iff S  S’ IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

  44. Final Remarks • cJoin models multi-way transactions by describing interacting agents but not their global structure • Compensations do not undo precommitted activities. • Can such compensations be encoded in cJoin? • Are cJoin primitives implementable? • We plan to use the D2PC protocol • The subcalculus of flat processes can be implemented IFIP-TCS 2004, Toulouse, August 21-27 2004

More Related