html5-img
1 / 64

Private Law - Contract

Private Law - Contract. Unit 7. Preview. 1.Introduction: Law of contract: revision 1.1. Private law: legal terms 3. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 3.1. First reading: understanding the contents and organisation of the text 3.2. Reading for detail and language study:

royce
Télécharger la présentation

Private Law - Contract

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Private Law - Contract Unit 7

  2. Preview 1.Introduction: Law of contract: revision 1.1. Private law: legal terms 3. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 3.1. First reading: understanding the contents and organisation of the text 3.2. Reading for detail and language study: 3.2.1. The facts of the case 3.2.2. The defence 3.2.3. Understanding complex sentences 3.2.4. Role play 3.2.5. People in private law: word formation

  3. Match each word to the correctdefinition: Plaintiff, to be entitled, to dismiss an appeal,case of first instance, damages, to hold • The first hearing of a case, not an appeal • Money given as legal compensation • To reject, or not accept an appeal • A person who brings an action in civil law • To have a right to something • To decide in legal proceedings

  4. Match each word to the correctdefinition: defendant, to hold, to be entitled, to dismiss an appeal, to sue, case of first instance, to deliver judgement, damages • A person who defends a civil or criminal action • To take legal action against someone in a civil case • To give a judicial decision

  5. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.[1893] 1 Q.B. 256 • V. = Versus • Co. = Company • 1 = volume 1 • Q.B. = the Queen’s Bench law reports • 256 = page 256

  6. Carlill vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

  7. Carlill vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

  8. Divide the text into the following sections: • 1) legal principles decided in the case • 2) the facts of the case • 3) decision in the case of first instance • 4) first judge’s decision in the appeal • 5) second judge’s decision and judgment in the appeal: arguments for the defendant

  9. Section (1)? • An offer, to be capable of acceptance, must involve a definite promise by the offeror that he will bind himself if the exact terms specified by him are accepted. • An offer may be made either to a particular person or to the public at large. • If an offer takes the form of a promise in return for an act, the performance of that act is in itself an adequate indication of assent.

  10. Section (2)? • APPEAL from a decision of Hawkins, J. • The defendants, who were proprietors and vendors of a medical preparation called “The Carbolic Smoke Ball,” inserted in the Pall Mall Gazette of November 13, 1891, and in other newspapers, the following advertisement:

  11. Section (2)? • “100l. Reward will be paid by the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company to any person who contracts the increasing epidemic influenza, colds, or any disease caused by taking cold, after having used the ball three times daily for two weeks according to the printed directions supplied with each ball. 1000l. Is deposited with the Alliance Bank, Regent Street, shewing our sincerity in the matter.

  12. Section (2)? • During the last epidemic of influenza many thousand carbolic smoke balls were sold as preventives against this disease, and in no ascertained case was the disease contracted by those using the carbolic smoke ball. One carbolic smoke ball will last a family several months, making it the cheapest remedy in the world at the price, 10s. post free. The ball can be refilled at a cost of 5s. Address, Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, 27, Princes Street, Hanover Square, London.”

  13. Section (2)? • The plaintiff, a lady, on the faith of this advertisement, bought one of the balls at a chemist’s, and used it as directed, three times a day, from November 20, 1891, to January 17, 1892, when she was attacked by influenza.

  14. Section (3)? • Hawins, J., held that she was entitled to recover the 100l. The defendants appealed.

  15. Section (4)? • Lindley, L.J. delivered judgment dismissing the appeal.

  16. Section (5)? • Bowen, L.J. I am of the same opinion. We were asked to say that this document was a contract too vague to be enforced.

  17. Section (5)? • The first observation which arises is that the document itself is not a contract at all, it is only an offer made to the public. The defendants contend next, that it is an ofer the terms of which are too vague to be treated as a definite offer, inasmuch as there is no limit of time fixed for the catching of the influenza, and it cannot be supposed that the advertisers seriously meant to promise to pay money to every person who catches the influenza at any time after the inhaling of the smoke ball.

  18. Definiteoffer To be considered definite, an offer (and a contract) generally must contain the following terms: (1) identification of the parties, (2) identification of the subject matter and quantity, (3) consideration to be paid, and (4) time of performance

  19. Section (5)? • It was urged also, that if you look at this document you will find much vagueness as to the persons with whom the contract was intended to be made – that, in the first place, its terms are wide enough to include persons who may have used the smoke ball before the advertisement was issued; at all events, that it is an offer to the world in general, and, also, that it is unreasonable to supose it to be a definite offer, because nobody in their senses would contract themselves out of the opportunity of checking the experiment which was going to be made at their own expense.

  20. Section (5)? • It is also contended that the advertisement is rather in the nature of a puff or a proclamation than a promise or offer intended to mature into a contract when accepted. But the main point seems to me that the vagueness of the document shews that no contract whatever was intended.

  21. The development of the text • Why do you think the case starts by stating the legal principles decided in the case?

  22. Scan the text to find 4 abbreviations. What do they mean? • J • Justice • l. • pound • s. • shilling • LJ • Lord Justice

  23. Scan the text to find the following: • Who was the plaintiff in the case of first instance? • Who were the defendants? • Who won the case of first instance? • Who appealed against the decision?

  24. Find the meaning of the following words using context clues: • 1000 £. is DEPOSITED with the Alliance Bank • Many thousand smoke balls were sold as PREVENTIVES against this disease and in no case was the disease contracted • Hawkins J. Held that she (the plaintiff) was entitled to RECOVER the 100 £ The defendants appealed.

  25. Definitions • To deposit = • to put a sum of money in a bank account • Preventives = • things that stop a person from catching a disease • Recover = • to get money from someone as the result of a favourable judgment in a lawsuit

  26. Answer the following questions: • What did the Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. sell? • What were they for? • According to the company, did they work? • Were they expensive? • Who did the Company offer to pay 100£ to? • Why did they deposit 1000£ with the bank?

  27. Answer the following questions: • Why did the plaintiff buy the product? • Did she follow the instructions? • Did it work in her case? • Why do you suppose the company made this offer? • In your opinion, does it look like a serious offer? Give reasons.

  28. Facts of the case • As a preventive against flu the plaintiff bought a carbolic smoke ball from the defendant company because she had read their advertisement. She used it according to the instructions.

  29. Which summary of the facts corresponds to the text? • 1) She later sued the company for damages because she caught flu. • 2) She later sued the company for the 100l. reward they had advertised because she caught flu. • 3) She later sued the company because she caught flu, and then appealed against the decision of the court of first instance.

  30. Describe the facts of the case: • “The defendants, the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, sold a product called carbolic smoke balls, which they advertised as a very good preventive against flu. In their advertisement the Company offered to pay...”

  31. Was the advertisment a contract? • No, it was an offer

  32. Understanding complex sentences • 1. Divide the sentence into short phrases • 2. Study each phrase: (1) for content – what information does it give? (2) for function – what is the relation to the rest of the sentence • 3. Think about the global meaning of the sentence: (1) what are the main points? (2) what other information is important?

  33. Example sentence • It was urged also

  34. Function? • that, if you look at this document • Preliminary condition

  35. Function? • you will find much vagueness • asserting

  36. Function? • as to the persons with whom the contract was intended to be made • specifying

  37. Function? • that, in the first place, its terms are wide enough • asserting

  38. Function? • to include persons who may have used the smoke ball before the advertisement was issued; • specifying

  39. Function? • at all events, that it is an offer to the world in general • asserting

  40. Function • And, also, that it is unreasonable to suppose it to be a definite offer, • asserting

  41. Function? • Because nobody in their senses would contract themselves out of the opportunity • explaining

  42. Function? • of checking the experiment which was going to be made at their own expense • specifying

  43. The sentence contains 4 main assertions. What are they? • The defendants contend that: • 1) the document is very vague (regarding the persons involved) • 2) its terms are wide enough (to include persons who may have used the smoke ball before the advertisement was issued) • 3) it is an offer to the world in general • 4) it is not a definite offer

  44. Divide the sentence into short, logical phrases • The Defendants contend next, that it is an offer the terms of which are too vague to be treated as a definite offer, inasmuch as there is no limit of time fixed for the catching of the influenza, and it cannot be supposed that the advertisers seriously meant to promise to pay money to every person who catches the influenza at any time after the inhaling of the smoke ball.

  45. Function: reporting/specifying/explaining/asserting? • The defendants contend next, • reporting

  46. Function: reporting/specifying/explaining/asserting? • that it is an offer • asserting

  47. Function: reporting/specifying/explaining/asserting? • the terms of which are too vague to be treated as a definite offer, • specifying

  48. Function: reporting/specifying/explaining/asserting? • inasmuch as there is no limit of time fixed for the catching of the influenza • reason - explaining

  49. Function: reporting/specifying/explaining/asserting? • and it cannot be supposed that the advertisers seriusly meant • asserting

  50. Function: reporting/specifying/explaining/asserting? • to promise to pay money • specifying

More Related