1 / 22

Formosat3 / COSMIC The Ionosphere as Signal and Noise

Formosat3 / COSMIC The Ionosphere as Signal and Noise. Christian Rocken, Bill Schreiner, Sergey Sokolovskiy, Doug Hunt, Stig Syndergard UCAR COSMIC Project. FORMOSAT-3. Status of Constellation April 23, 2008. Ionosphere as signal. Ionosphere is noise. Radio Occultation.

roz
Télécharger la présentation

Formosat3 / COSMIC The Ionosphere as Signal and Noise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Formosat3 / COSMICThe Ionosphere as Signal and Noise Christian Rocken, Bill Schreiner, Sergey Sokolovskiy, Doug Hunt, Stig Syndergard UCAR COSMIC Project FORMOSAT-3

  2. Status of Constellation April 23, 2008

  3. Ionosphere as signal Ionosphere is noise Radio Occultation

  4. Over 1 Million Profiles 4/21/06-4/15/08 Neutral Atmosphere Ionosphere

  5. We estimate systematic ionospheric error by computing the “mean of the iono-free bending angle minus neutral bending angle (from climatology) in the 60-80 km height bin”. We compare this quantity “smean” for daytime vs. nighttime soundings. COSMIC Days 0-120, 2007 -20 < Lat. < 20 DAY (11<LT<15) smean= -1.19 e-7 rad NIGHT (2<LT<6) smean=-0.37e-7 rad Ionospheric Calibration We can see the day vs. night iono bias change we expect that we can monitor the change of this bias to better than 0.5e-7 rad during the 11-year solar cycle.

  6. Relationship of F10.7 / Bending Bias/ Temperature The bending angle change of +3 e-7 rad due to change in solar activity would cause a apparent stratospheric warming of: 0.6 / 0.4 / 0.2 deg K at 30 / 25 / 20 km. F10.7 BA Bias

  7. Ionosphere as “Noise” Summary • In RO the ionosphere is corrected by forming the “standard” dual frequency linear combination of L1 and L2 bending angles • This correction does not completely eliminate the ionospheric effect • Significant random noise remains which can affect profiles for weather forecasting down to 25 km altitude • The residual ionosphere also introduces a bias, which - if left uncorrected -could introduce a significant spurious “warming with decreasing solar activity” signal at 30 km in the stratosphere of ~ 0.6 deg K with the 11 year solar cycle. • Methods have been developed to minimize the “ionosphere as noise” so that it becomes largely insignificant below 25 km. • At altitudes 25-40 km the ionosphere remains the most significant noise source for RO

  8. Amount of COSMIC-observed Trans Ionospheric TEC Data Quality of abs. TEC ~2 TECU COSMIC trans-ionospheric radio links for a 100-min period, June 29, 2007

  9. Location of Low-Latency TEC Arcs Current Latency of COSMIC TEC Data Most data are downloaded from Satellites < 100 m Processing at CDAAC takes ~ 20 minutes

  10. Comparisons with ground-based data Courtesy of Jiuhou Lei

  11. COSMIC - Ionosonde ComparisonJan. 2008, distance < 500 km, time difference < 15 min, colors indicate ionosondes F0F2 rms=0.60 MHz HMF2 rms=57 km

  12. Scintillation Sensing with COSMIC No scintillation S4=0.005 Scintillation S4=0.113 GPS/MET SNR data

  13. Amplitude scintillations (S4 index based on 50-Hz observations) E-Layer scintillation: Occurs at all local times except near sun-rise (3-7 LT), strongest near sun-set (14-19 LT). Most active between 20-60 deg north and south latitude More pronounced in NH than SH Stronger S4 than F-layer scintillation

  14. Amplitude scintillations (S4 index based on 50-Hz observations) F-Layer scintillation: Occurs sunset to sunrise (19 - 5 LT). Most active in equatorial region (+/- 30 degrees). Weaker S4 than E-layer scintillation

  15. What comes after COSMIC? • Several Options for a follow - on mission are discussed and considered by US agencies • Participation in a Taiwan 6+ satellite follow on mission (2012) • Iridium has proposed to use (some of) its 64 future communication satellites as a platform for RO observations (2013 ?) • CICERO plans to launch 24 satellites (starting in 2011) and to sell data • Planned improvements compared to COSMIC • Plan for lower data latency. Goal of 10-15 minutes (more ground stations, or real-time satellite to satellite downlink) • Observations of GPS and Galileo (Glonass?, Compass?) • More TEC arcs and soundings • Community feedback on requirements and secondary space weather payloads for future mission should be provided to UCAR

  16. Summary • In the 2 years since launch COSMIC has generated and distributed over 1.3 million ionospheric profiles and TEC arcs • COSMIC is now also generating a large amount of scintillation observations • COSMIC ionospheric observations are of high quality and most products are available within < 120 minutes of on-orbit collection, some within < 30 minutes • All data are available from www.ucar.cosmic.edu • Follow on missions for COSMIC are now in planning stages and input from the space weather community is needed • UCAR COSMIC program is presently looking for a scientist to take charge of our ionospheric processing

More Related