140 likes | 253 Vues
This presentation by Frans A. van der Loo explores the evolution of wind power in the Netherlands over four decades, highlighting lessons in value-sensitive design for both onshore and offshore wind energy. It reviews the impact of technological advancements, procedural changes, and social acceptance from local to national levels. Key insights include the importance of clean and reliable energy, the benefits of larger turbines, and the critical role of stakeholders in the development process. The discussion emphasizes the need for integrating social responsibility into wind energy systems to ensure public acceptance and successful implementation.
E N D
Four decades of windpower development:some ‘value sensitive design’ lessons Frans A. van der LooBrussels 22 november 2013
The context • Dutch innovation policy: Energy topsectorBio-energy Energy efficiency buildings Energy efficiency industry Gas Smart Grids Windpower Offshore Solar energy • NWO Research programme ‘Responsible innovation’Shale gas Smart grids Windpower Offshore Green production, etc. • ‘Embedding social responsibility in the design of offshore wind energy systems’TU Delft, prof.dr. Rolf Künneke e.a. (university) TKI-Windoffshore, NWEA e.a. (industry)
Content • Wind onshore- from niche to system-innovation (1973-2013)- technical and procedural design- the lessons • Wind offshore- large-scale implementation 2030- impact and acceptability • Value sensitive design- some lessons
Wind onshore: the system 1 2 3 stand-alone windfarm 2450 MW
Wind onshore: technical design 75 kW 600 kW Impact:-visual-noise-shadow 7500 kW
Wind onshore: the value drivers • Clean&Reliable:more windpower- Political independance 1973 (Oil-boycot)- Acid rain 1980- Climate change 1990- Political independance 2008 (Russia-Ukraine) • (Cost-)Efficiency:bigger turbines • Social acceptance:from local to national procedures
Wind onshore: value sensitive design lessons (1) Technology • turbine larger + more efficient (75kW to 7500kW) • from 2 to 3 rotorblades • from turbine to windfarm (line/array) • less noise • shadow-interrupting
Wind onshore: value sensitive design lessons (2) Procedures (institutional) • Spatial planning • Procedure/ initiative changes • Stakeholders: from farmer to Province to Parliament • Process: from ‘technical’ to political (and legal procedures) • Grid-connection: grid-enforcement, codification, congestion-law • Tariff: from fixed fee to APX-trade (Spot, Intra-day, Day-ahead)
Wind offshore: the system Egmond aan Zee108 MW 2012: 5.000 MW EWEA 2030:150.000 MW
Wind offshore: the system in context Environment Citizens StakeholdersOil&GasShipping Fishery Military Recreation Wind Offshore Politics System& Infrastructure
Wind offshore: ‘value sensitive’ impact These issues might pose critical factors to public acceptance
Value sensitive design: some lessons • Wind onshore development shows value sensitive design - in technology and procedures. • From niche to system-innovation: new kind of impacts, new kind of issues, new kind of policies- not only technology • Wind offshore implementation: anticipate the large-scale impacts- We can learn from wind onshore.- Social Impact Report? (cf. Environmental Impact Report) • Wind offshore value sensitive design should focus on:- Costs/Benefits (public budgets + framing)- Sea-stakeholder cooperation- Grid-extension + organisation- Life-cycle management- Logistics- CSR
Thank you! Discussion? Frans A. van der LooLOO e-Consultinfo@looeconsult Responsible innovation programme Wind offshoreTU Delft prof.dr. R. Künneker.w.kunneke@tudelft.nl