Mastering Team Management: A Thin Methodology to Win in Business
Dive into Brian Vanderjack's innovative project management methodology designed to enhance team performance and accountability. This guide provides actionable steps to develop effective teams, implement a Supercharged Responsibility Matrix, and establish metrics for success. Learn key concepts like intentional versus unintentional underperformance, the importance of effective communication, and how to build a solid foundation from the start. Perfect for team leaders and managers striving for excellence in dynamic business environments.
Mastering Team Management: A Thin Methodology to Win in Business
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Brian Vanderjack, PMP, MBA Team Management to "Win" in Business LS0101 © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Context • As is/no warranty • Any feedback becomes a gift to the author • Any registered trademark remains the property of the original owner • No intent to imply endorsement of any organization • Not to be duplicated, or stored, in whole or in part © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Back Story • Jim meets “Bull” © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
What’s Here For You? A thin project management methodology that you can use to manage teams. Why? Increase your chances of meeting commitments - when it counts. © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Why is Excellence in Teams Critical? • Personal advancement • Support larger efforts • Fewer surprises • Important tasks more likely to get done © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Outline • Introduction & Scope • “Super Charged Responsibility Matrix” • Metrics Setup • Metrics Process • Issue resolution © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Introduction & Scope © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Why is Effective Team Management Critical? • Virtual teams • Global presence • Thin profit margins • No one knows it all © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Core Assumptions • Vision • Mission • Work path follows single-thread • Task ownership is the issue © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Build Infrastructure at the Start • Team building • Nip meandering in the bud • Honeymoon stage • Before “Transition” starts © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Audience Experience • Underutilized resource • Behavior • Impact on team • Impact on organization Team buiding! © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Damage Control - Intentionally Underperforming Team Member • Does not want success • Social loafer • Power/Control • Firefighter © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Damage Control - Unintentionally Underperforming Team Member • Just don’t get it • Bandwidth • Skill • Process • Health issues © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
“Bolt-On” for Sub-Team • Isolate key topics • High visibility to critical tasks • Easier to understand responsibilities • Hawthorne-effect © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Supercharged Responsibility Matrix © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Supercharged Responsibility Matrix © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Supercharged Responsibility Matrix - Checklist • What is expected • Who is responsible • When it is expected • Dates • Contact information © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Example Vision & Mission; Vision: Provide “green” energy, that improves the environment and addresses the needs of the consumer market. Mission: Move ping-pong ball shaped capsules of nuclear waste at least four linear feet. © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Example: To Do • Get together into teams of four or less. • Fill out “Supercharged Responsibility Matrix” on Page 2. Build phase only (page six can help you) • When done, double check results using the appropriate “checklist” Group Discussion • Could this focus a team on to the correct tasks? • How does this relate to intentional underperformers? • How relate to unintentional underperformers? © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Backbone Knowledge • What are Milestones? • Tasks in Verb/Noun form • Contact information easy to find here • Best if in chronological order • Need to practice • Time units defined by effort • Predecessors possible, however… © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Metrics - Setup & Process © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Metrics Defined • Measurements relating to a process’s output or aspects of a process itself. • Typically used in making decisions about a business process. © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Metrics Setup - Example © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Metrics Setup Checklist • “Box-in” quality • Within control • Met-not-met • Linked to “mission” • Optimized • Unintended consequences • Agency theory • Can deliver stated reward • Educate direct-stakeholders © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Example: To Do • Please fill out the “Metrics – Setup” on page four. Group DiscussionCould this focus a team on to the correct tasks?Signal corrective action is needed.Clear expectations?Why is it sometimes so difficult to get these?Need assumptions to be stated? © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Metrics Process Example C-SPIN assigns management staff to Brian Plans reviewed closely with stakeholders on future events. C-SPIN gives Brian a free ticket to next C-SPIN event! C-SPIN buys Brian a new CAR!!! © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Metrics Process Checklist • Schedule regular inspections • Learning opportunity • Link corrective actions to right area/people • Trigger point • Compassion • Authority to enact improvements • Clear measurement process • Management by Wandering Around © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Example: To Do • Fill out “Metrics – Process” on Page five of the handout Group DiscussionDo effective awards have to cost money?Enact able corrective actions?Do you agree: fix the process not the person? © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Issue Resolution © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
“Healthy” Issue Resolution • Options • Flip a coin 1) Options 2) Value 3) Probability of success 4) Select best • Back story • Options • 3) Pro/Con • 4) Recommendation © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Observations on Issue Resolution • Once the issue is correctly defined…. • Share solution • Stakeholders • Know your limits © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Example: To Do • Please use the materials supplied to, and the information you created, to create the Nuclear Waste Mover. • Please note, the design has not been tested and you can alter it. © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Example: To Do • Should you assign a “leader” • Should “testing” be a part of it? • How could you tailor this for use at work tomorrow? © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Contest • Almost valuable prizes are at stake • The winner….most number of linear feet • Three teams will be selected at random to participate © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Observations © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Comments • Documentation is accessible • Don’t forget to appoint a leader • Tailor this as appropriate © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Forward • Team needs to agree to this process, in writing • New team members must “opt-in” © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Summary © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Forward You need to practice this. © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Summary: If you need to… • Organize your team team • Set clear expectation • Shape behavior • Drill down into important tasks • Get past issues Use this! © 2010 Brian Vanderjack
Brian Vanderjack, PMP, MBA © 2010 Brian Vanderjack