1 / 19

Update on Categorical Program Monitoring

Co-op Directors September 22, 2010 H é ctor Rico, Director Categorical Compliance Division Patrick McMenamin, Administrator Categorical Program Monitoring Office Erin Carter, Web Producer/Administrator WestEd Interactive. Update on Categorical Program Monitoring. Purpose.

rumer
Télécharger la présentation

Update on Categorical Program Monitoring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Co-op DirectorsSeptember 22, 2010Héctor Rico, DirectorCategorical Compliance DivisionPatrick McMenamin, AdministratorCategorical Program Monitoring OfficeErin Carter, Web Producer/AdministratorWestEd Interactive Update on Categorical Program Monitoring

  2. Purpose • Review Proposed Pilot of Redesigned 4x2 CPM Model for 2010-11 • Discuss next steps • Q & A

  3. Basic Facts • In February, 2009, Jack announced the suspension of all non-mandated on-site CPM visits for at least one year • He called for a “top-to-bottom” review of our compliance monitoring system in order to redesign the system to “focus the greatest attention on those schools that need the most assistance” • The SBE increased its focus on resolving non-compliant items • CPM reviews resumed January 2010 • Limited Scope • Pilot of risk-based LEA selection criteria • California Accountability & Improvement System (CAIS)

  4. CPM Redesign Objectives • Focus the greatest attention on schools that need the most assistance • Increase the use of technology to widen CDE’s statewide monitoring efforts through a combination of on-site and on-line reviews • Focus monitoring efforts on student achievement results • Mitigate findings (e.g. not utilizing a risk-based method for LEA selection; insufficient focus on fiscal issues; subrecipient monitoring) from audits & reviews of the CDE by the BSA and ED

  5. Key Change in CPM Model Previous Model Proposed 4x2 Model Year 1 On-site review Pool Year 2 Optional self-review and/or work on resolving outstanding issues Year 3 Online Review Pool Year 4 Optional self-review and/or work on resolving outstanding issues Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 On-site review Pool As Needed: Follow-up reviews on-site

  6. Proposed Redesigned CPM 4x2 Model

  7. 2010-11 Selection Criteria • Four independent variables: three risk-based and one random sample • Of the LEAs selected each year for an on-site or online review, 90% will be selected if they fall under any of the following three independent risk variables; 10% will be selected via a random selection process • Tentative Risk Variables: • 1. Academic: Top Cycle A LEAs with • API (e.g. <800 in LEA or any subgroup) & • PI (e.g. ≥3 yrs) & • Title II (e.g. Level C) & • Title III (e.g. ≥4 yrs) Note: Proposed criteria subject to change

  8. 2010-11 Selection Criteria (cont’d) 2. Fiscal A: Top Cycle A LEAs in • School districts: • Per Pupil Allocation & Carryover % • County offices of education: • Total Allocation & Carryover % 3. Fiscal B: • Subset of the Top 20 Cycle A LEAs in Total Allocation • 5 LEAs to be selected, taking into consideration history of audit findings Note: Proposed criteria subject to change

  9. 2010-11 Selection Criteria : Funding Sources • Per Pupil Allocation & Total Allocation : • Title I Pt. A (Basic & Neglected) • Title I Pt. C (Migrant) • Title I Pt. D (Delinquent) • Title II (ITQ) • Title III (LEP & Immigrant) • Title X Pt. C (Homeless) • Career Technical Education • Economic Impact Aid • ARRA (Title 1 Pt. A&D, SFSF, & Homeless) • Ed Jobs Fund Note: Proposed sources subject to change

  10. 2010-11 Selection Criteria : Funding Sources (cont’d) • Carryover %: • Title I Pt. A • Title I Pt. D • Title II • Title III • EIA Note: Proposed sources subject to change

  11. Tentative 2010-11 Participating Programs or Instruments: • Adult Education (AE) • Before and After School Programs (BASP) (NCLB Title IV, Part B [21stCCLC]; [ASSETs]; & [ASES]) • Career Technical Education (CTE) • Child Development (CD) • Compensatory Education(CE) (NCLB Title I, Pt. A; & ARRA) (Former PI Instrument incorporated into CE Instrument) • Education Equity (EE) • Ed Jobs Fund(EJ) • English Learner(EL) (including NCLB Title III) • Fiscal Monitoring(FM)

  12. Tentative 2010-11 Participating Programs or Instruments (Cont’d): 10. HIV/AIDS Prevention (HIV) • Homeless Education (HE) (NCLB Title X, Pt. C; & ARRA) • Improving Teacher Quality (ITQ) (NCLB Title II, Pt.A) • Migrant Education(ME) (NCLB Title I, Pt. C) • Neglected or Delinquent(NorD)(NCLB Title I, Pt. D; & ARRA) • Physical Education (PE) • State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) (ARRA) • Uniform Complaint Procedures (UCP)

  13. Next Steps • Cycle A LEAs selected for a 2010-11 CPM on-site review will receive notification • Cycle C LEAs selected for a 2010-11 CPM online review will receive notification subsequent to Cycle A LEAs being notified of their reviews • Cycle A & C LEAs selected for a 2010-11 CPM review will be notified a minimum of 45 days in advance of on-site review or online submission deadline

  14. Next Steps (cont’d) • Soon after LEA receives notification of on-site CPM review: • CDE team lead will contact LEA’s CPM coordinator to facilitate scheduling and other matters in preparation for the review • LEA will submit an “LEA General Information Form” to help the CDE team lead and LEA coordinator make decisions regarding scheduling and other matters • LEAs will receive CAIS training

  15. Next Steps (cont’d) • Information regarding training on program requirements/instruments is forthcoming • New Ed Job Fund (EJ) and Fiscal Monitoring (FM) instruments (Titles I Parts A&C, II, III, IV)

  16. Possible Timeline • Notification to LEAs selected for on-site reviews likely by early October • Training on CAIS and Program Instruments to begin shortly after notification • On-site reviews likely to begin early December • Notification of online reviews and submission deadlines TBD (most likely after the start of the new year 2011).

  17. Resources: CPM Team Leads 17

  18. Other Resources CPM Office: 916-319-0935 CPM website: www.cde.ca.gov/ta/cr/cc CDE/WestEd CAIS Support: caishelp@cde.ca.gov CPM Redesign input mailbox: cpmredesign@cde.ca.gov ARRA & Ed Jobs Act website: www.cde.ca.gov/ar 18

  19. Q & A CAIS 19

More Related