1 / 44

Chapter 23 Bond Portfolios: Management and Strategy

By Cheng Few Lee Joseph Finnerty John Lee Alice C Lee Donald Wort. Chapter 23 Bond Portfolios: Management and Strategy. Outline. 23.1 Bond Strategies 23.1.1 Riding The Yield Curve 23.1.2 Maturity-structure Strategies 23.1.3 Swapping 23.2 Duration

rupali
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 23 Bond Portfolios: Management and Strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. By Cheng Few Lee Joseph Finnerty John Lee Alice C Lee Donald Wort Chapter 23 Bond Portfolios: Management and Strategy

  2. Outline • 23.1 Bond Strategies • 23.1.1 Riding The Yield Curve • 23.1.2 Maturity-structure Strategies • 23.1.3 Swapping • 23.2 Duration • 23.2.1 Weighted-average Term To Maturity • 23.2.2 WATM Versus Duration Measure • 23.2.3 Yield To Maturity • 23.2.4 The Macaulay Model • 23.3 Convexity • 23.4 Contingent Immunization • 23.5 Bond Portfolios: A Case Study • 23.6 Summary

  3. 23.1 Bond Strategies • 23.1.1 Riding the Yield Curve • 23.1.2 Maturity-Structure strategies • 23.1.3 Swapping 23.1.3.1 Substitution Swap23.1.3.2 Intermarket-Spread Swap23.1.3.3 Interest-Rate Application Swap23.1.3.4 Pure-Yield Pickup Swap

  4. 23.1.1 Riding the Yield Curve Riding the yield curve is an investment strategy designed to take advantage of yield-curve shapes that are expected to be maintained for a period of time. Given the yield-curve shape, an investor then decides whether to purchase a debt security that matures at the end of his or her time horizon or to purchase a longer-term debt security which can be sold at time T.

  5. 23.1.2 Maturity-Structure strategies A common practice among bond-portfolio managers is to evenly space the maturity of their securities. Under the staggered-maturity plan bonds are held to maturity, at which time the principal is reinvested in another long-term maturity instrument. An alternative to a staggered portfolio is the dumbbell strategy. Dumbbell portfolios are characterized by the inclusion of some proportion of short and intermediate term bonds that provide a liquidity buffer to protect a substantial investment in long-term securities.

  6. 23.1.2 Maturity-Structure strategies Figure 23.1 Dumbbell Maturity Strategy The dumbbell portfolio divides its funds between two components. The shortest maturity is usually less than three years, and the longest maturities are more than 10 years. In Figure 23.1, it is apparent why this is called the dumbbell strategy — the resulting graph looks like a weight lifter’s dumbbell.

  7. 23.1.3 Swapping Swapping strategies generally concentrate on highly specialized trading relationships. A commonly accepted method for classifying such swaps is Homer and Leibowitz’s four types: (1) pure yield-pickup swap, (2) interest-rate anticipations, (3) intermarket swap, and (4) substitution swap.

  8. 23.1.3.1 Substitution Swap Substitution swap attempts to profit from a change in yield spread between two nearly identical bonds. The trade is based upon a forecasted change in the yield spread between the two nearly bonds. Both the H-bond (the bond now held) and the P-bond (the proposed purchase) are equality, coupon, and maturity. The swap is executed at a time when the bonds are mispriced relative to each other.

  9. Sample Problem 23.1 (Substitution Swap) Table 23.1 Evaluation Worksheet for a Sample Substitution Swap Source: Homer, S., and M. L. Leibowitz, Inside the Yield Book. Prentice-Hall and New York Institute of Finance, 1972, p. 84.

  10. In Table 23.2, as the workout time is reduced, the relative gain in realized compound yield over the workout period rises dramatically. The substitution swap may not work out exactly as anticipated due to: (1) a slower workout time than anticipated, (2) adverse interim spreads, (3) adverse changes in overall rates and (4) the P-bond’s not being a true substitute. Table 23.2 Effect of Workout Time on Substitution Swap: 30-Year 7s Swapped from 7% YTM to 7.10% YTM Source: Homer and Leibowitz, 1972, p. 85 Sample Problem 23.1 (Substitution Swap)

  11. Sample Problem 23.1 (Substitution Swap) • In the substitution swap, major changes in overall market yields affect the price and reinvestment components of both the H- and P-bond. However, as these effects tend to run parallel for both the H- and P-bond. • Table 23.3 shows that the relative gain from the swap is insensitive even to major rate changes. Table 23.3 Effect of Major Rate Changes on the Substitution Swap: 30-Year 7s Swapped from 7% to 7.1%, Realized Compound Yields—Principal Plus Interest Source: Homer and Leibowitz, 1972, p. 87.

  12. 23.1.3.2 Intermarket-Spread Swap • The intermarket spread swap works on trading between sector-quality-coupon categories, based upon a forecasted change in yield spread between two different categories. Table 23.4 Evaluation Worksheet for a Sample Intermarket-Spread Swap in a Yield-Pickup Direction Source: Homer and Leibowitz, 1972, p. 90

  13. Sample Problem 23.2 (Intermarket-Spread Swap) Table 23.5 shows that 24.5-basis-point gain over 30 years is less than the initial 50-basis-point gain because the same reinvestment rates (RR) benefits the bond with lower starting yield relative to the bond with the higher starting yield. Table 23.5 Effect of Various Spread Realignments and Workout Times on the Sample Yield-Pickup Intermarket Swap: Basis-Point Gain (Loss) in Realized Compound Yields (Annual Rate) Source: Homer and Leibowitz, 1972, p. 91

  14. Sample Problem 23.2 (Intermarket-Spread Swap) Table 23.6 shows another example that the H-bond is the 30-year 7s priced at par, and the P-bond is the 30-year 4s period at 67.18 to yield 6.50%. The investor believes that the present 50-basis-point spread is too narrow and will widen. Table 23.6 Evaluation Worksheet for a Sample Intermarket-Spread Swap with Yield Giveup Source: Homer and Leibowitz, 1972, p. 88

  15. Sample Problem 23.2 (Intermarket-Spread Swap) In Table 23.7, there is a high premium to be placed on achieving a favorable spread change within a relatively short workout period. Table 23.7 Effect on Various Spread Realignments and Workout Times on the Sample Yield-GiveupIntermarket Swap: Basis-Point Gain (Loss) in Realized Compound Yields (Annual Rate) Source: Homer and Leibowitz, 1972, p. 89

  16. Sample Problem 23.3 (Interest-Rate Anticipation Swap) • Suppose an investor holds a 7% 30-year bond selling at par. He expects rate to rise from 7% to 9% within the year. Therefore, a trade is made into a 5% T-note maturing in one year and selling at par, as in Table 23.8 . Table 23.8 Evaluation Worksheet for a Sample Interest-Rate-Anticipation Swap Source: Homer and Leibowitz, 1972, p. 94

  17. Sample Problem 23.4 (Pure Yield-Pickup Swap) • Suppose an investor swaps from the 30-year 4s at 671.82 to yield 6.50% into 30-year 7s at 100 to yield 7% for the sole purpose of picking up the additional 105 basis points in current income or the 50 basis points in the YTM. The investor intends to hold the 7s to maturity. Table 23.9 Evaluation Worksheet for a Sample Pure Yield-Pickup Swap Source: Homer and Leibowitz, 1972, p. 99

  18. 23.2 Duration 23.2.1 Weighted-Average Term to Maturity (WATM) 23.2.2 Weighted-Average Term to Maturity (WATM) versus Duration Measure 23.2.3 Yield to Maturity 23.2.4 The Macaulay Model

  19. 23.2 Duration Duration (D) has emerged as an important tool for the measurement and management of interest-rate risk: (23.1) where: = the coupon-interest payment in periods 1 through n – 1; = the sum of the coupon-interest payment and the face value of the bond in period n; = the YTM or required rate of return of the bondholders in the market; t = the time period in years.

  20. 23.2.1 Weighted-Average Term to Maturity The weighted-average term to maturity (WATM) computes the proportion of each individual payment as a percentage of all payments and makes this proportion the weight for the year the payment is made: (23.2) where: = the cash flow in year t; t = the year when cash flow is received; n = maturity; and TCF = the total cash flow from the bond.

  21. Sample Problem 23.5 (WATM) Suppose a ten-year, 4-percent bond will have total cash-flow payments of $1400. Thus, the $40 payment in will have a weight of 0.0287 ($40/$1400), each subsequent interest payment will have the same weight, and the principal in year 10 will have a weight of 0.74286 ($1040/1400). Therefore: The WATM is definitely less than the term to maturity, because it takes account of all interim cash flows in addition to the final payment.

  22. 23.2.2 Weighted-Average Term to Maturity (WATM) versus Duration Measure The duration measure is simply a weighted-average maturity, where the weights are stated in present value terms. In the same format as the WATM, duration is (23.3) where: = the present value of the cash flow in year tdiscounted at current yield to maturity; t = the year when cash flow is received; n = maturity; and PVTCF = the present value of total cash flow from the bond discounted at current yield to maturity.

  23. 23.2.2 Weighted-Average Term to Maturity (WATM) versus Duration Measure Table 23.10Weighted-average Term to Maturity (Assuming Annual Interest Payments) Source: Reilly and Sidhu, “The Many Uses of Bond Duration.” Financial Analysts Journal (July/August 1980), p. 60.

  24. 23.2.2 Weighted-Average Term to Maturity (WATM) versus Duration Measure Table 23.11Duration (Assuming 8-percent Market Yield)

  25. 23.2.2 WATM versus Duration Measure • By comparing Table 23.10 with Table 23.11, due to the consideration of the time value of money in the duration measurement, duration is the superior measuring technique. Table 23.11Duration (Assuming 8-percent Market Yield) (Cont’d)

  26. 23.2.3 Yield to Maturity Based uponChapter 5, Yield to maturity is an average maturity measurement in its own way because it is calculated using the same rate to discount all payments to the bondholder — thus, it is an average of spot rates over time. It has been shown that realized yield (RY) can be computed as a weighted average of the YTM and the average reinvestment rate (RR) available for coupon payments: (23.4)

  27. 23.2 Duration Duration appears a better measure of a bond’s life than maturity because it provides a more meaningful relationship with interest-rate changes. This relationship has been expressed by Hopewell and Kaufman (1973) as: (23.5) where = “change in”;P = bond price; D = duration; and I = market interest rate.

  28. 23.2 Duration- Characteristics (1) • The higher the coupon, the shorter the duration, because the face-value payment at maturity will represent a smaller proportional present-value contribution to the makeup of the current bond value. Table 23.12 shows the relationship between duration, maturity, and coupon rates for a bond with a YTM of 6%. Table 23.12Duration, Maturity, and Coupon Rate

  29. 23.2 Duration- Characteristics (1) When the coupon rate is the same as or greater than the yield rate (the bond is selling at a premium), duration approaches the limit directly. Conversely, for discount-priced bonds (coupon rate is less than YTM), duration can increase beyond the limit and then recede to the limit. Figure 23.2 Duration and Maturity for Premium and Discount Bonds

  30. 23.2 Duration- Characteristics (2) • The higher the YTM, the shorter the duration, because YTM is used as the discount rate for the bond’s cash flows and higher discount rates diminish the proportional present-value contribution of more distant payments (as shown in Table 23.13). Table 23.13Duration and Yield to Maturity

  31. 23.2 Duration- Characteristics (3) • A typical sinking fund (one is which the bond principal is gradually retired over time) will reduce duration (as shown in Table 23.14). • Table 23.14 Duration With and Without Sinking Funds (Assuming 8% Market Yield)

  32. 23.2 Duration- Characteristics (3) Table 23.14Duration With and Without Sinking Funds (Assuming 8% Market Yield) (Cont’d) Source: Reilly and Sidhu, 1980, pp. 61-62.

  33. 23.2 Duration- Characteristics (4) For bonds of less than five years to maturity, the magnitudes of duration changes are about the same as those for maturity changes (as shown in Figure 23.3).

  34. 23.2 Duration- Characteristics (5) • In contrast to a sinking fund, all bondholders will be affected if a bond is called. The duration of a callable bond will be shorter than a noncallable bond. • To provide some measure of the return in the event that the issuer exercises the call option at some future point, the yield to call is calculated instead of the YTM. • The crossover yield is defined as that yield where the YTM is equal to the yield to call. • When the price of the bond rises to some value above the call price, and the market yield declines to value below the crossover yield, the yield to call becomes the minimum yield.

  35. Sample Problem 23.6 To calculate the crossover yield for a 8%, 30-year bond selling at par with 10-year call protection, the annual return flow divided by the average investment can be used as an approximation for the yield. The implied crossover yield is 8.46%: In one year’s time the bond’s maturity will be 29 years with nine years to call. If the market rate has decline to the point where the YTM of the bond is 7%, which is below the crossover yield of 8.46%, the bond’s yield to call will be 6%:

  36. 23.3 Convexity If this linear relationship between percentage change in bond price and change in yield to maturity is not hold, then Equation (23.5) can be generalized as: (23.6) Where the Convexity is the rate of change of the slope of the price-yield curve as: (23.7) Where is the cash flow at time t as definition in Equation (23.2); n is the maturity; represents either a coupon payment before maturity or final coupon plus par value at the maturity date. is the capital loss from a one-basis-point (0.0001) increase in interest rates and is the capital gain from a one-basis-point (0.0001) decrease in interest rates

  37. Sample Problem 23.7 (Convexity) Figure 23.4 The Relationship between Percentage Changes in Bond Price and Changes in YTM Figure 23.4 is drawn by the assumptions that the bond with 20-year maturity and 7.5% coupon sells at an initial yield to maturity of 7.5%. Because the coupon rate equals yield to maturity, the bond sells at par value, or $1000. The modified duration and convexity of the bond are 10.95908 and 155.059 calculated by Equation (23.1) and the approximation formula in Equation (23.7), respectively.

  38. Sample Problem 23.7 (Convexity) Figure 23.4 shows that convexity is more important as a practical matter when potential inertest rate changes are large. When change in yield is 3%, the price of the bond on dash line actually falls from $1000 to $671.2277 with a decline of 32.8772% based on the duration rule in Equation (23.5): According to the duration-with-convexity rule, Equation (23.6), the percentage change in bond price is calculated in following equation: The bond price $741.0042 estimated by the duration-with-convexity rule is close to the actual bond price $753.0727 rather than the price $671.2277 estimated by the duration rule.

  39. 23.4 Contingent Immunization Contingent immunization allows a bond-portfolio manager to pursue the highest yields available through active strategies while relying on the techniques of bond immunization to assure that the portfolio will achieve a given minimal return over the investment horizon. The difference between the minimal, or floor, rate of return and the rate of return on the market is called the cushion spread. Equation (23.8) shows the relationship between the market rate of return, Rm, and the cushion C to be the floor rate of return, RFL. (23.8)

  40. 23.4 Contingent Immunization Fig. 23.5. Contingent Immunization Figure 23.5 is a graphical presentation of contingent immunization. If interest rates were to go down, the portfolio would earn a return in excess of the because of the manager’s ability to have a portfolio with a duration larger than the investment horizon.

  41. 23.5 Bond Portfolios: A Case Study Table 23.15 shows the calculation of duration of the bond with a five-year maturity and a 10% coupon at par under rate of interest at 10%. TABLE 23.15 Weighted Present Value

  42. 23.5 Bond Portfolios: A Case Study • Table 23.16 shows an example of the effect of attempting to protect a portfolio by matching the investment horizon and the duration of a bond portfolio. Table 23.16Comparison of the Maturity Strategy and Duration Strategy for a 5 Year Bond

  43. 23.5 Bond Portfolios: A Case Study The fact that a premium would be paid for this five-year bond at the end of four years is an important factor in the effectiveness of the duration concept. A direct relationship between the duration of a bond and the price volatility for the bond assuming given changes in the market rates of interest can be shown as: Where BPC = the percent of change in price for the bond; D* = the adjusted duration of the bond in years, equal to D/(1+r); and r = the change in the market yield in basis points divided by 100. Under the duration 4.13 years and interest-rate change from 8% to 10.5%, we can obtain D*=4.13/(1+0.105)=3.738. It implies that the price of the bond should decline by about 3.7% for every 100-basis-point increase in market rates.

  44. 23.6 SUMMARY The management of a fixed-income portfolio involves techniques and strategies that are unique to the specific area of bonds. This chapter has discussed riding the yield curve, swaps, and duration as three techniques that are familiar to all managers of fixed-income portfolios. A comparison of these techniques was presented in the previous section in the context of a case situation. Overall, this chapter has related bond-valuation theory to bond-portfolio theory and has developed bond-portfolio management strategies.

More Related