1 / 59

An Overview of National Transfer Accounts

An Overview of National Transfer Accounts. Andrew Mason May 2009. Outline. Introductory Remarks National Transfer Flow Account Wealth and Wealth Revaluation Account briefly described. Objectives.

rusti
Télécharger la présentation

An Overview of National Transfer Accounts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Overview of National Transfer Accounts Andrew Mason May 2009

  2. Outline • Introductory Remarks • National Transfer Flow Account • Wealth and Wealth Revaluation Account briefly described

  3. Objectives • Develop a system of accounts that measures the economic lifecycle and the flow of economic resources across age groups. • Comprehensive approach that includes all reallocations: investment, credit, and public and familial transfers • Consistent with and complementary to National Income and Product Accounts

  4. Objectives • International in scope to allow analysis of institutions and policies in countries at different levels of development and with different cultures. • Historical depth to improve understanding about evolution of labor, consumption, saving, and public and private support systems • Projections to support policy analysis

  5. Importance • Interage flows are large – about half of GDP. • Profound effect on economic growth and generational equity (demographic dividends) • Central to human capital investment • Systems are strained by changes in age structure

  6. Organization • Lead institutions • East-West Center • Center for the Economics and Demography of Aging, University of California – Berkeley • Funding • National Institute on Aging • United Nations Population Fund • IDRC • MacArthur Foundation • Others • Website: www.ntaccounts.org

  7. Participating Countries

  8. Conceptual Foundations • Lee (1994), Samuelson (1958), Diamond (1965), and Willis (1988). • Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, Miller (2009); Lee, Lee, Mason (2008).

  9. II. National Transfer Accounts

  10. Deficits Life cycle deficit is equal to the difference between consumption and labor income at each age. Surplus

  11. Lifecycle deficit is the difference between production and consumption over the lifecycle. All values are totals for the age group. Per capita values are also estimated.

  12. Public & Familial Transfers Asset-based Reallocations Asset-based reallocations involve inter-temporal exchange.

  13. Inflows Labor Income Asset Income Transfer Received Outflows Consumption Saving Transfers Paid The Flow Account Identity

  14. Classification of Flows • Mediating institution • Public flows are mediated by the government • Private flows are mediated by households, families, NGOs, private individuals, etc. • Rest of the World • Economic form • Transfers • Asset-based reallocations

  15. Public Sector • Serves as an intermediary • Transfer function • Takes resources from one age group (taxes) • Gives those resources to another age group • In-kind transfers, e.g., health, education, national defense, etc. • Cash transfers, e.g., public pension programs, unemployment benefits, welfare programs, etc. • Asset-related function • Saves on behalf of the population (age groups) • Borrows from investors (age groups) on behalf of taxpayers (age groups) • Earns asset income and pays interest on debt

  16. Private Sector • Intermediaries: households, families, NGOs, private individuals • Transfer function: individuals give and receive transfers • Inter-household transfers including to ROW • Intra-household transfers • Capital transfers, e.g., bequest (not included in flow account) • Asset related function • Accumulate and dis-accumulate assets • Capital • Public and private debt • Asset income

  17. Households vs. Individuals • Individual is the basic unit of analysis • Consumption, labor income, public transfers, and intra-household private transfers are allocated to individuals; • Some public transfers are assigned to household head. • Inter-household private transfers are between household heads; • Assets are held by the household head; saving is by household heads; asset income accrues to household head.

  18. Net inflow: asset income exceeds saving. Net outflow: saving exceeds asset income.

  19. Lower panel measures the reallocation systems employed to satisfy the lifecycle deficits and surpluses at each age.

  20. Asset-based reallocations are equal to asset income (profits, interest income and rent) less saving. Age groups with negative asset reallocations are saving in excess of their asset income.

  21. Net transfers consist of public transfers (cash transfers + in-kind transfers less taxes) and private transfers (mostly familial transfers). Positive values imply that inflows exceed outflows.

  22. Issue 1: Lifecycle Deficit, Children • Does the lifecycle deficit per child increase as the number of children declines? • Becker quality-quantity tradeoff • If so, the decline in fertility will have a smaller effect on capital accumulation. • However, if consumption is higher because parents are spending more on education, then human capital will increase as the number of children declines.

  23. Per Capita Lifecycle Deficit, Japan 2004, Survival Weighted Child LCD 15.1 years of prime-adult labor Elderly LCD 10.5 years of prime-adult labor Note. US 1985-89 life table used for all countries.

  24. Tradeoff: Spending per Child and Number of Children, 13 Countries

  25. Tradeoff: Spending per Child and Number of Children, 13 Countries Jp US Ch Tw SK Th Sw Fr Indo Ur CR In Ph

  26. Issue 2: Lifecycle Deficit, Elderly • Does the lifecycle deficit per elderly decline as the number of elderly rises? • Preston and others argue yes – political power. • If so, the rise in the old-age population will have a larger effect on capital accumulation.

  27. Tradeoff: Spending per Elderly and Number of Elderly, 13 Countries

  28. Tradeoff: Spending per Elderly and Number of Elderly, 13 Countries Ur Jp US CR Fr Tw Th Ch Sw SK Ph In Indo

  29. Issue 3. Support Systems for the Elderly. • How do they differ across countries? • Do Asian or African countries rely more on familial transfers and Western countries more on public transfers? • Does the expansion of public systems crowd out saving as hypothesized by Feldstein? • Or familial transfers?

  30. Old-Age Reallocation Systems Saving Capital-based transformation Social welfare transformation Traditional society? Familial Transfers Public Transfers

  31. Old-Age Reallocation Systems Saving Mixed Strategies 50-50 saving and public 50-50 familial and saving 50-50 familial and public Familial Transfers Public Transfers

  32. Old-Age Reallocation Systems Saving Public transfers and familial transfers are substitutes. Familial Transfers Public Transfers

  33. Old-Age Reallocation Systems Saving Feldstein: Public transfers to the elderly crowd out saving. Familial Transfers Public Transfers

  34. Reallocation System, 65+, Selected Countries for a Recent Year

  35. Thailand Elderly by Age (2004) Source: Chawla (2008)

  36. South Korea (2000) Similar to Thailand but public transfers covering 1/3 of support Source: National Transfer Accounts

  37. Mexico (2004) Mexico like S Korea except family transfers play a less signifcant role. Source: Mejia-Guevara (2008)

  38. United States (2003) Unlike previous examples public transfers increase with age rather than familial transfers Source: Lee, Lee & Mason (2007)

  39. Japan (2004) Intermediate case. Both familial transfers and public transfers increase with age. Source: Ogawa, Mason, Chawla & Matsukura (2008)

  40. Austria (2000) Extreme case. No upward familial transfers; little reliance on asset-based reallocations. Public sector dominates. Source: Fuernkranz-Prskawetz & Sambt (2008)

  41. Conclusions • Decline in fertility may • Lead to more consumption by children reducing the effect on saving • Lead to more spending on education for children leading to second demographic dividend due to human capital investment. • Influence familial support systems in ways that have not yet been explored.

  42. Conclusions • Aging may lead to • Larger per capita lifecycle deficit reinforcing the effects of aging • The economic effect will be some unknown combination of the three: • Increase saving and economic growth • Increase the size of public programs and budget deficits; or • Increase the burden on families which support the elderly.

  43. Conclusions • The support systems for the elderly are varied and do not conform to simple regional classifications. • The elderly in Costa Rica and Japan are relying on saving and public transfers. Have public programs crowded out familial transfers? • In Taiwan and Thailand, the familial support system is still important.

More Related