1 / 24

Closure of Kern’s Method

Closure of Kern’s Method. P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi. Another Peculiar Averaging Method.…. Shell-Side Reynolds Number. Reynolds number for the shell-side is based on the equivalent diameter and the velocity based on a reference flow:.

rvallery
Télécharger la présentation

Closure of Kern’s Method

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Closure of Kern’s Method P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Another Peculiar Averaging Method.….

  2. Shell-Side Reynolds Number Reynolds number for the shell-side is based on the equivalent diameter and the velocity based on a reference flow:

  3. Identification of (Pseudo) Velocity Scale

  4. Pseudo Shell side Mass Velocity: Perpendicular Flow The shell-side mass velocity is found with

  5. Hydraulic or Equivalent Diameter : Axial Flow • A Hydraulic radius based on cross flow cannot recognize the importance of tube layout. • The equivalent diameter is calculated along (instead of across) the long axes of the shell and therefore is taken as four times the net flow area as layout on the tube sheet (for any pitch layout) divided by the wetted perimeter.

  6. Free Flow Area for Square Layout: Free Flow Area for Triangular Layout:

  7. Perimeter for square Layout: Perimeter for triangular Layout: Equivalent diameter for square layout: Equivalent diameter for Triangular layout:

  8. Shell-Side Reynolds Number Reynolds number for the shell-side is based on the equivalent diameter (based on axial flow) and the velocity on the cross flow area at the diameter of the shell:

  9. Justification for this peculiar Definition of Re • It is true that, this method of evaluating the hydraulic radius (based on axial flow) and pseudo velocity (based on perpendicular flow) does not account for relative percentage of cross flow and parallel flow. • The proportions of normal flow and axial flow will be influenced by baffle spacing. • Out of many possible definitions, this particular definition could generate an accurate correlation for h & f.

  10. Correlation for Shell side Heat Transfer Coefficient

  11. Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient for the Heat Exchanger The overall heat transfer coefficient for clean surface (Uc) is given by Considering the total fouling resistance, the heat transfer coefficient for fouled surface (Uf) can be calculated from the following expression:

  12. Outlet Temperature Calculation and Length of the Heat Exchanger The outlet temperature for the fluid flowing through the tube is The surface area of the heat exchanger for the fouled condition is :

  13. and for the clean condition where the LMTD is always for the counter flow. The over surface design (OS) can be calculated from :

  14. The length of the heat exchanger is calculated by

  15. Hydraulic Analysis for Tube-Side • The pressure drop encountered by the fluid making Np passes through the heat exchanger is a multiple of the kinetic energy of the flow. • Therefore, the tube-side pressure drop is calculated by The second term in above equation is the additional pressure drop introduced by the change of direction in the passes. The tube fluid experiences sudden expansions and contractions during a return that is accounted for allowing four velocity heads per pass.

  16. Hydraulic Analysis for Shell-Side • The shell-side fluid experiences a pressure drop as it passes through the exchanger, over the tubes, and around the baffles. • If the shell fluid nozzles (inlet and outlet ports) are on the same side of the heat exchanger, then the shell-side fluid makes an even number of the tube bundle crossings, but if they are on opposite sides, then it makes an odd number of the bundle crossings. • The number of bundle crossings therefore influences the pressure drop.

  17. Based on experiments, the pressure drop experienced by the shell-side fluid is calculated by Where,

  18. μbis the viscosity of the shell-side fluid at bulk temperature, and μwis the viscosity of the tube-side fluid at wall temperature. The wall temperature can be calculated as follows:

  19. Evaluation & Fine tuning of Design • Insufficient Thermal Rating • Insufficient Pressure Drop Rating

  20. Insufficient Thermal Rating • If the output of the rating analysis is not acceptable, a geometrical modification should be made • If the required amount of heat cannot be transferred to satisfy specific outlet temperature, • one should find a way to increase the heat transfer coefficient or increase exchanger surface area • One can increase the tube side heat transfer coefficient by increasing the fluid velocity - Increase number of tube passes • One can increase the shell side heat transfer coefficient by decreasing baffle spacing and/or baffle cut • One can increase the surface area by • Increasing the heat exchanger length • Increasing the shell diameter • Multiple shells in series

  21. Insufficient Pressure Drop Rating • If the pressure drop on the tube side is greater than the allowable pressure drop, then • the number of tube passes can be decreased or • the tube diameter can be increased which may result to decrease the tube length – (Same surface area) • increase the shell diameter and the number of tubes • If the shell side pressure drop is greater than the allowable pressure drop then baffle spacing, tube pitch, and baffle cut can be increased or one can change the baffle type. THERE IS ALWAYS A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN THERMAL & PRESSURE DROP RATINGS!

  22. The Trade-OffBetween Thermal Balance & Flow Loss • Heat transfer and fluid friction losses tend to compete with one another. • The total energy loss can be minimized by adjusting the size of one irreversibility against the other . • These adjustments can be made by properly selecting physical dimensions of the solid parts (fins, ducts, heat exchanger surface). • It must be understood, however, that the result is at best a thermodynamic optimum. • Constraints such as cost, size, and reliability enter into the determination of truly optimal designs.

  23. Roadmap To Increase Heat Transfer • Increase heat transfer coefficent • Tube Side • Increase number of tubes • Decrease tube outside diameter • Shell Side • Decrease the baffle spacing • Decrease baffle cut • Increase surface area • Increase tube length • Increase shell diameter à increased number of tubes • Employ multiple shells in series or parallel • Increase LMTD correction factor and heat exchanger effectiveness • Use counterflow configuration • Use multiple shell configuration

  24. Roadmap To Reduce Pressure Drop • Tube side • Decrease number of tube passes • Increase tube diameter • Decrease tube length and increase shell diameter and number of tubes • Shell side • Increase the baffle cut • Increase the baffle spacing • Increase tube pitch • Use double or triple segmental baffles

More Related