1 / 7

Proposed Changes to the Selection Criteria

Proposed Changes to the Selection Criteria. Date: 2009-07-14. Authors:. Abstract. This presentation discusses proposed changes to the Selection Criteria document 11-09/0059r4. Proposed Methodology (1). From the Selection Criteria document 11-09/0059r4 that was accepted by the Task Group:

ryann
Télécharger la présentation

Proposed Changes to the Selection Criteria

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proposed Changes to the Selection Criteria Date: 2009-07-14 Authors:

  2. Abstract • This presentation discusses proposed changes to the Selection Criteria document 11-09/0059r4

  3. Proposed Methodology (1) From the Selection Criteria document 11-09/0059r4 that was accepted by the Task Group: 4. a) The Specification Framework document shall be created by incorporating individual Functional Blocks that have been approved by the Taskgroup with 75% approval 5. After Taskgroup approval (75% approval vote) of the Specification Framework document, Ad Hoc Sub groups will be created, organized by Functional Block(s), as outlined in the Specification Framework. The above text specifies that Functional Blocks are first “down selected” by the Task Group before Ad Hoc groups are created for further development

  4. Proposed Methodology (2) • Seems like that different approach was suggested in the document 09/0633 • Specification Framework document may include many candidate functional blocks • Task Group accepts many candidate Functional Blocks • Functional blocks may be further investigated in the Ad Hoc groups • However, Specification Framework document will most likely require some form of downselection to be accepted by the Task Group

  5. Proposed Methodology (3) We see three possibilities how to proceed with the creation of the Specification Framework document: Downselect the Functional Block in the Task Group Agrees with the Selection Criteria document 11-09/0059r4 wording Create Ad Hoc groups first that would propose downselected Functional Blocks Clause 5 of the Selection Criteria document 11-09/0059r4 needs to be changed and voted on again Task Group to divide the Functional Requirements document into two parts: Basic (Core) Functional Blocks Set Mandatory or optional features Functional Blocks Set to be investigated in the Ad Hoc groups May become later a part of the Basic Feature Set (mandatory or optional)

  6. Proposed Methodology (4) Task Group or Ad Hoc group Functional Blocks downselection process Pros: Process most likely open to more options to be investigated Cons: Downselection process may prove to be difficult and lengthy Many techniques will most likely be investigated in parallel Two part Specification Framework document Pros: It may be easier to agree upon a Basic Functional Blocks Set Specification development for the Basic Functional Blocks Set may start early Potentially less difficult and faster standardization process Cons: Process most likely open to less options to be investigated Depends on the Functional Blocks Set to be investigated voted by the Task Group

  7. Discussion • Two part Specification Framework document may allow for potentially less difficult and faster standardization process • For the Task Group, it may be easier to select a Basic (Core) Functional Blocks set and then to move on to promising Functional Blocks to be investigated

More Related