1 / 25

Strategy and Execution

Strategy and Execution. Sean Riley VP/GM High Density Solutions Lattice Semiconductor (Previously: Intel, MathStar) May 2009. Agenda. Strategy and Execution Examples Good Strategy and Solid Execution Minimal Strategy and Solid Execution Good Strategy and Poor Execution. Winning is:

ryo
Télécharger la présentation

Strategy and Execution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strategy and Execution Sean Riley VP/GM High Density Solutions Lattice Semiconductor (Previously: Intel, MathStar) May 2009

  2. Agenda • Strategy and Execution • Examples • Good Strategy and Solid Execution • Minimal Strategy and Solid Execution • Good Strategy and Poor Execution

  3. Winning is: 20% Strategy 80% Execution

  4. Winning is: 20% Strategy 80% Execution

  5. Audience for Strategy • The primary audience of a strategy is: • A. Customers • B. Shareholders • C. Employees • D. Analysts

  6. Audience for Strategy • The primary audience of a strategy is: • A. Customers • B. Shareholders • C. Employees • D. Analysts They are the only ones who are paid to execute your strategy

  7. Why is Strategy Important? • Explains your differentiation • Enables employees to figure out how to quickly apply resources • One good and one bad example: Strategy 1: Be the market leader in the ceiling fan segment Strategy 2: Develop the world’s most quiet ceiling fans

  8. Perspectives on Strategy • Strategy is about winning • Revenue and profits are nice too… • Your fellow employees must believe they can win • Must make sense, even if it’s a stretch • They must fundamentally understand why they will win • Unless everyone knows it, you don’t have a strategy Fastest First Easiest to Use Best Support

  9. The Details of a Good Strategy Define… • The target customer segments • The customer’s perceived problems which are currently unsolved • The competitors, their positions & why they aren’t solving the problems • How your offering will be different • The opportunity in revenue and profit over time • And most important: the keys to successful execution

  10. Winning is: 20% Strategy 80% Execution

  11. Strategy and Execution • You might still win with no strategy and perfect execution • You will lose with a perfect strategy and lousy execution

  12. Strategy and Execution • What is more likely to generate revenues and profits? • Get the less-than-perfect product you have now into the market • Delay your product so you can add market-leading features

  13. “Strategy” for Solid Execution • Focus • Funding • People • Partners • Time

  14. “Strategy” for Solid Execution • Focus • Funding • People • Partners • Time • Can easily state what you are not doing • Lead-customer driven • Priority is 1, 2, 3 not 1, 1, 1 • Project goals are well documented

  15. “Strategy” for Solid Execution • Focus • Funding • People • Partners • Time • Funds support additional resources for “crunch time” • Funding timing is understood • If funding is contingent, then criteria is clearly documented

  16. “Strategy” for Solid Execution • Focus • Funding • People • Partners • Time • Projects are staffed for success • ZBB (zero based budget) is reviewed regularly • Find key players who can wear multiple hats • Ensure people are motivated towards goals

  17. “Strategy” for Solid Execution • Focus • Funding • People • Partners • Time • Minimize dependencies beyond your control • Assign real bandwidth to program management • It’s always better to “pay” than to “partner”

  18. “Strategy” for Solid Execution • Focus • Funding • People • Partners • Time • Don’t buffer schedules • But do tightly manage external commitments • Don’t assume competitors will be too early or too late • Introduce lead developers to customers

  19. Be Optimistic and Face Reality “You must never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end – which you can never afford to lose – with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be.” - Admiral Jim Stockdale

  20. Examples MathStar Strategy: Establish new FPOA architecture as next generation of programmable logic Intel Networking Strategy: Drive the transition to Fast Ethernet Good Strategy Intel Chipsets Strategy: Execute better than everyone else Minimal Strategy Solid Execution Poor Execution

  21. Intel NetworkingGood Strategy, Solid Execution • Strategy: Drive transition to Fast Ethernet • Details: Differentiate NIC product line with performance/efficiency benchmark • Focus: Everyone understood the goal • Funding: Fast Ethernet was funded, even if other product lines suffered • People: A+ Israeli Si design team assigned • Partners: SynOptics and Cisco, but on the “other end of the wire” • Time: First to market with new features

  22. Intel ChipsetsMinimal Strategy, Solid Execution • Strategy: Execute better than everyone else • Details: OEMs addicted to “cadence” - same size die and schedule every year • Focus: Get to the bus stop ahead of the bus • Funding: Funding aligned to cadence • People: Best program management at Intel • Partners: Intel CPUs, PCI Ecosystem • Time: Always a new product for back-to-school

  23. MathStarGood Strategy, Poor Execution • Strategy: Establish new FPOA architecture as the next generation of programmable logic • Details: FPOAs 4X better perf. than FPGAs • Focus: Lots of “priority 1” tasks • Funding: Funding tight but not a problem • People: Good team but stretched over silicon, dev. tools, IP and boards • Partners: External design tools never matured • Time: Products consistently a year late - did not tightly manage external commitments

  24. Winning is: 20% Strategy 80% Execution

  25. Questions?

More Related