1 / 27

Hegemony Online

Hegemony Online. The Quiet Convergence of Power, Culture, and Computers by Michael D. Dorsher, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Communication and Journalism University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. Abstract.

sabina
Télécharger la présentation

Hegemony Online

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hegemony Online The Quiet Convergence of Power, Culture, and Computers by Michael D. Dorsher, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Communication and Journalism University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire

  2. Abstract This dissertation study uses qualitative methods to develop a theory of how online communication mediates the relationship between power and culture. It then tests this theory of hegemony online with quantitative methods applied to a survey of 137 Internet users. The study finds that most users of online communication spend most of their time on hegemonic Web pages. Specifically, it concludes that subjects who are less alienated from society, low on e-mail usage and high on Web usage are most likely to choose Web pages that are highly hegemonic.

  3. Research Questions • How does online communication mediate the relationship between power and culture? • Which variables best predict the usage of hegemony online?

  4. Definitions • Hegemony • An iterative process whereby people in power deepen their dominance by using culture to negotiate for the consent of the subjugated. • Counterhegemony • An alternative process whereby people attempt to gain dominant power by countering, co-opting and compromising dominant culture. It is not the opposite of hegemony; it is merely someone else's hegemony — one that has not yet become dominant. • Pluralism • The sharing of power among groups in society. It is the opposite of hegemony and counterhegemony.

  5. Definitions • Cybernetic • A system that uses continuous feedback to control and progressively correct unsatisfactory actions. • Hegemony online • A cybernetic process whereby people in power deepen their dominance by using online communication to negotiate for the consent of the subjugated.

  6. Hypotheses • Most of the study's subjects will spend most of their online time using hegemonic Web pages. • The longer they use an online page or message, the higher they'll rate it. • Online counterhegemony usage will be higher if they are nonwhite. • Online hegemony usage will be higher among men than women. • Online hegemony usage will be higher the more they rate toward the masculine end of the gender scale. • Online hegemony usage will be higher the lower they rate on the alienation scale.

  7. The Sample • 137 volunteers • 106 undergraduates from U. of Md., American U., Howard U. • 87 whites, 16 blacks, 6 Asians, 3 Asian-Americans, 3 Hispanics • 90 women, 47 men • 72 “feminine” on Bem Sex Roles Inventory, 65 “masculine”

  8. How they spent time online • 75.4% of the time spent on the Web (993 pages), 24.6% on e-mail (162 messages) • 13.9% spent on Web surfing for “personal information” • 12.2% on newspaper Web sites • 11.8% writing e-mails • 11.4% on sports Web sites • 9.1% reading personal e-mails … • 0.3% responding to Web ads

  9. Negotiated Hegemonic

  10. Closed Hegemonic

  11. Pluralism

  12. Closed Counterhegemonic

  13. Negotiated Counterhegemonic

  14. Hegemony Online, by Alienation

  15. Model Summary(b) Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .297(a) .089 .066 6.0787 a Predictors: (Constant), WHROUTLG, ALIENATN, EHROUTLG b Dependent Variable: HEGSCORE Multiple Regression

  16. Coefficients(a) Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Model B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 5.368 1.369 3.922 .000 ALIENATN -2.764 1.184 -.205 -2.335 .021 EHROUTLG -3.365 1.615 -.197 -2.083 .039 WHROUTLG 2.909 1.524 .180 1.909 .059 a Dependent Variable: HEGSCORE Multiple Regression

  17. Conclusions • There is support for the theory that online communication mediates power and culture to yield hegemony online. • i.e., online communication is better at concentrating power than redistributing it. • The manifestation of hegemony online will continue to evolve and be negotiated through cybernetics, a process of control and correction.

  18. Limitations of the Study • Convenience sample, mostly comprising students • But they are the vanguard of the online audience. • The hypotheses were theory-based, not derived from data. • The data do not support five of my 14 hypotheses. • Should have oversampled for users with their own home pages and users who shopped online. • The study tests for the existence of hegemony online but not the cybernetic process of deepening dominance.

  19. Future Research • There is a need for longitudinal studies of online communication • To assess how it evolves in negotiation with its users, and to assess how it affects subjugation/alienation • These studies should be generalizable, by drawing upon random samples that reflect the universe of online communication and its users.

More Related