1 / 19

29 July 2008

Item 3. Narrowing the Gap Proposition to LSP Delivery Group July 2008 Kersten England/Andrew Pitts. 29 July 2008. Basic Premise. Narrowing the Gap remains a key commitment of all Partners within the LSP NTG to be embedded in strategy, planning and performance management

sadah
Télécharger la présentation

29 July 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Item 3 Narrowing the Gap Proposition to LSP Delivery Group July 2008 Kersten England/Andrew Pitts 29 July 2008

  2. Basic Premise • Narrowing the Gap remains a key commitment of all Partners within the LSP • NTG to be embedded in strategy, planning and performance management • For the Borough (LAA) • For organisations (Corporate Plans) • For services (business plans) • For individuals (performance appraisal)

  3. Five Dimensions • Making the Case • Approach • Focus • Resources • Timelines

  4. 1. Making the Case • Emphasis on Prosperity of the whole Borough • Economic • Social • Environmental • Emphasis on Personalisation and Choice Customer/User/Citizen • Emphasis on independence, self reliance, responsibility

  5. Examples • Work on skills acquisition with NEETS – labour market supply, decreased benefit dependency, increased local revenue and spend • Early targeted interventions with groups susceptible to development of chronic health conditions (chronic heart disease, respiratory, diabetes etc) - Getting upstream on costs of care, decreased benefit dependency

  6. Examples • Tackling disproportionate involvement of young people from specific communities in anti-social behaviour - Reduction in fear of crime reduces isolation, increases perceived safety and usage of public space including town and village centres, boosts night time economy etc

  7. Examples • Provision of affordable housing in rural areas - Sustainable communities - Retention of local labour - Resilient housing market

  8. 2. The Approach • Equitable access to appropriate services consultation/engagement/needs assessment market research/market penetration co-design personalisation and choice equality impact assessments

  9. 2. The Approach (cont’d) • Tackling differential outcomes Targeted specific interventions Review and Redesign of provision • Building a solid evidence base demographics socio-economic locality specific – SOA level community of interest specific trends data

  10. 2. The Approach (cont’d) • Embed in planning and performance management - LAA blocks - Corporate organisational priorities - Business units - For individuals

  11. 3. Focus • Each thematic partnership reviews NTG dimension of indicators within total set of 198 which relate to their activity • Priorities drawn from 33 indicators for safer and stronger, children and young people, healthier communities and older people, environment and economy • Identification of shared priorities • Reflected in action plan for indicator delivery • Reflected in associated strategies

  12. 4. Resources for Delivery • Base, Area Based Grant, other external funding streams, income/additional revenue • Policy, Equality, Cohesion, Community Engagement, VCS, specific responsibilities and contributions • Equality Frameworks (eg Equality Standard for Local Government) and Comprehensive Area Assessment • Embedded within all workloads.

  13. 5. Timelines for Delivery/Impact • Short - Transform approach to access to services - embed NTG within Borough planning and performance management

  14. 5. Timelines for Delivery/Impact (cont’d) - Enhanced engagement and involvement of communities of interest and locality. - Some safer, cleaner, greener, stronger agendas

  15. 5. Timelines for Delivery/Impact (cont’d) • Medium - Education and Skills

  16. 5. Timelines for Delivery/Impact (cont’d) • Long Term Requiring significant societal change/behaviour/ lifestyle changes/infrastructure investment Health Housing

  17. Proposition The Golden Thread

  18. Proposition • Each thematic partnership identify NTG focus • Supported by shared development of policy and best practice via LSP research and intelligence hub (new) • Supported by skills expertise from VCS, equality and engagement facilitators

  19. Timescales • By December 2008 each thematic partnership to have developed case and action plans for NTG within delivery of LAA2.

More Related