Addressing End-Point Problems: DMP vs. EEMD Approaches
This document explores the challenges of end-point problems in data extraction methods, specifically the Dual-mode Predictive (DMP) and Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) techniques. It highlights that DMP experiences more severe end-point issues than EEMD. The document outlines essential steps for parameter adjustments and specific tests for ensuring optimal behavior of both methods. It provides an intuitive example with a noisy time series, clarifying how to effectively resolve end-point problems and enhance data extraction accuracy through careful parameter management.
Addressing End-Point Problems: DMP vs. EEMD Approaches
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Method • DMP have more serious end-point problem then EEMD • Test extraction should be performed to ensure the behavior of DMP and EEMD modes • Observe the range of EEMD that may combine with DMP • Adjust COMB(6) and COMB(7) to the desired range • Observe whether the end-point problem is serious
Cont. • In case it is serious, we need to adjust 3 set of EJME parameters: • Critical Amplitude(COMB(5)) and • Critical correlation(COMB(4)) • The plateau function(COMB(2)) (COMB(3))
How to set those parameters • Open ejme.m • Increase COMB(2) and decrease COMB(3) • compress the domain of plateau function • Decrease COMB(4) and COMB(5) to enhance combination • Alter COMB(6) and COMB(7) according to trial eemd • Note that COMB(2)-(5) should not be varied too much
Full Example • Noised time series that has • a trend term, • two sinusoidal components • a white noise term
FFT Spectrum • 2 peaks • We extract f=1.5 first
End-Point Problem • End point problem is a nuisance at the right end • DMP has 1 less peak than expected
2nd Extraction • Pick f=3.5
End point problem • For this mode end-point problem is even more rampant. • Phase is slightly distorted
p Target EEMD modes
Comparison • IMF3 looks a lot better • slight improvement on IMF2 • This demonstrates how to save DMP from end-point problem