1 / 5

Crouching Tigers Hidden Prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape

Crouching Tigers Hidden Prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape . Paper by: Timothy G. O’Brien, Margaret F. Kinnaird, and Hariyo T. Wibisono Animal Conservation 2003 131-139 Presented by: Caroline Mullis Geography Major Geog 370. Spatial Problem.

sahkyo
Télécharger la présentation

Crouching Tigers Hidden Prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Crouching Tigers Hidden Prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape Paper by: Timothy G. O’Brien, Margaret F. Kinnaird, and Hariyo T. WibisonoAnimal Conservation 2003 131-139 Presented by: Caroline Mullis Geography Major Geog 370

  2. Spatial Problem • Problem: Looking at the distribution and abundance of Sumatran tigers and nine prey species in Selatan National Park, in Sumatra, Indonesia • Hypothesis: Habitat loss and illegal hunting of prey and the tigers are responsible for the observed patterns of abundance (decrease).

  3. Methods, Data, and Test • Method: Use of passive infared camera-traps to assess abundance and distribution of tigers relative to prey availability, park boundaries and density of human population. • Cameras set in 10 by 2 km sampling blocks, oriented from park boundary toward park interior to detect edge effects. • Photo taken when sensor triggered, dated and timed. Traps left for 35 days. • Cameras were retrieved from locations filmed examined for tigers and prey • RAI- relative-abundance indices were calculated from the number of independent photographs of a species with number of days it took to acquire. (measured effort expected to increase as density decreased) • Same area was sampled before, and goal was to compare camera trap abundance indices with density estimates from using the CAPTURE method previously developed by Nichols (1998). • Used linear regression on RAI

  4. Results • Using CAPTURE model to determine density within sampling area • Results found that tiger abundance varied with abundance of large prey (pigs), strong correlation. • RAI-2 four times higher for tigers in areas of low human density. • Goal of study first to demonstrate that abundance of tigers and prey are directly related to independently derived estimates of densities, and show influence of human densities on abundance.

  5. Conclusions • Need for monitoring habitat conditions, prey populations, and monitoring poaching will help prevent the furthering of the endangerment of the tigers. • Criticisms: effective use of camera traps and good explanation of RAI’s but lack of original conclusion. Useful to include further suggestions of remedies.

More Related